NATION

PASSWORD

MEP's vote keep disgusting perks and salary's.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

MEP's vote keep disgusting perks and salary's.

Postby The Matthew Islands » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:39 pm

European politicians rejected three cost-cutting measures, which would have seen salaries frozen and travel allowances cut, in a move branded as "shameful"...
Conservative and Ukip MEPs voted for the cost-saving proposals but Labour and Liberal Democrat members either voted against or abstained.


Would someone like to remind me why the EU is a good idea?
This is ridiculous. They are calling for austerity packages from all member nations but continue handing themselves lavish perks.

Does anyone even know what MEP's really do and who they are?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/8441261/MEPs-vote-to-keep-world-beating-salaries-and-allowances.html
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:43 pm

I hate that we in the UK are in the EU, we don't even get a say in it. The 'trade' argument is a load of crap too. Non-EU members do fine when it comes to trade in Europe.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:44 pm

The Lib Dems and such opposed this because they said it was misrepresentative and wouldn't actually lower Parliament's salaries.
I guess that's kind've true, it just would've kept them from getting a raise and made them fly economy-class rather than business.
I don't think that's too much to ask of politicians. But, maybe someone who knows EU politics more could explain where I'm going wrong?
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:46 pm

Well easier trade and travel are nice. The immigration laws are nice too. If we signed up to more of their treaties we'd have less asylum seekers and illegal immigrants too, which seems to be what everyone opposed to the EU wants

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:55 pm

Unchecked Expansion wrote:Well easier trade and travel are nice. The immigration laws are nice too. If we signed up to more of their treaties we'd have less asylum seekers and illegal immigrants too, which seems to be what everyone opposed to the EU wants

Hardly. Some of the people opposed to the EU wan't less immigration. Signing up to more stuff wouldn't actually decrease immigration, just make those entering illegally legal.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Siorafrica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1649
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Siorafrica » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:58 pm

Of course a small group will vote for more money for themselves. The poor are socialist and the rich are capitalist. That's politics. /thread
NSG Thread Wheel;give it a spin and watch the trainwreck begin. http://cheezburger.com/View/5084656640
A doubleplusgood guide to NSpeak. http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=16895
Population of NationStates. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=138705479531836
Yes by and large NSG for the most part absolutely has nothing but utter unadulterated contempt for religion and those who dare express it openly.-Skibereen
Oi with the arguing in circles over the same tired old topic yet again, and the trolling one another on either side with 'who is a real Christian' and 'why your logic sucks'. How about we put this one to bed again. It's going nowhere. You aren't going to change anyone's minds. Stick a fork in it kids - it's done.-Dread Lady Nathanica

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:59 pm

Lordieth wrote: Non-EU members do fine when it comes to trade in Europe.


Which is pretty much twattish free riding on massive efforts by the EU on regulatory and duty harmonisation, but whatever.

User avatar
The Deleted Chris
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1513
Founded: Nov 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deleted Chris » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:00 pm

No shit. Hopefully one more drain on British public faith in the EU.

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:02 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:Hardly. Some of the people opposed to the EU wan't less immigration. Signing up to more stuff wouldn't actually decrease immigration, just make those entering illegally legal.

Wrong. The Schengen agreement forces immigrants to be processed in their country of entry into the EU. Which would mean those coming across from France can be sent back without issues. As we are not party to the agreement, the French don't care about anyone that reaches us

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:04 pm

Siorafrica wrote:Of course a small group will vote for more money for themselves. The poor are socialist and the rich are capitalist. That's politics. /thread

This wasn't a small group, it was a majority because the cost cutting measure failed.
Unchecked Expansion wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:Hardly. Some of the people opposed to the EU wan't less immigration. Signing up to more stuff wouldn't actually decrease immigration, just make those entering illegally legal.

Wrong. The Schengen agreement forces immigrants to be processed in their country of entry into the EU. Which would mean those coming across from France can be sent back without issues. As we are not party to the agreement, the French don't care about anyone that reaches us

Is that for nations outside of the EU? I thought that member nations of the EU couldn't restrict the movement of people from other EU nations.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:04 pm

Siorafrica wrote:Of course a small group will vote for more money for themselves. The poor are socialist and the rich are capitalist. That's politics. /thread


Isn't Norway socialist?

It's pretty rich too, I think.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Helertia
Minister
 
Posts: 3270
Founded: Nov 28, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Helertia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:50 pm

The Deleted Chris wrote:No shit. Hopefully one more drain on British public faith in the EU.


And one more drain on the British public faith in representative democracy.
Do hypocrites hate hypocrisy?

User avatar
F1-Insanity
Minister
 
Posts: 3476
Founded: Jul 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby F1-Insanity » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:58 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Lordieth wrote: Non-EU members do fine when it comes to trade in Europe.


Which is pretty much twattish free riding on massive efforts by the EU on regulatory and duty harmonisation, but whatever.


Harmonization = EU word for 'gleichschaltung'... not a good idea...
F1-Insanity Factbook
World Bowl XII: Winner
Why yes, I am a progressive and social human being, thanks for asking!
Think about the numbers in terms that we can relate to. Remove eight zeros from the numbers and pretend it is the household budget for the fictitious Jones family:
-Total annual income for the Jones family: $21,700
-Amount of money the Jones family spent: $38,200
-Amount of new debt added to the credit card: $16,500
-Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710

-Amount cut from the budget: $385
Help us Obi Ben Bernanki, printing more money is our only hope... for a big bonus! - Wall Street
Bush's 'faith' was the same political tool as Obama's 'hope'.

User avatar
Call to power
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6908
Founded: Apr 13, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Call to power » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:02 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:Would someone like to remind me why the EU is a good idea?


http://youtu.be/lFyywfHbj3M

The Matthew Islands wrote:This is ridiculous. They are calling for austerity packages from all member nations but continue handing themselves lavish perks.


Politicians vote against taking economy class flight you say!?

This is pathetic

The Matthew Islands wrote:Does anyone even know what MEP's really do and who they are?


they are your elected members of the European Parliament and you are either 12 or not of a sufficient knowledge to be commenting on the affairs of the European Union.

Lordieth wrote:I hate that we in the UK are in the EU, we don't even get a say in it.


only we do and Britain has a big say in the EU...so like stick to doing the Mails crossword please
The Parkus Empire wrote:Theoretically, why would anyone put anytime into anything but tobacco, intoxicants and sex?

Vareiln wrote:My god, CtP is right...
Not that you haven't been right before, but... Aw, hell, you get what I meant.

Tubbsalot wrote:replace my opinions with CtP's.


User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:05 pm

F1-Insanity wrote:Harmonization = EU word for 'gleichschaltung'... not a good idea...


Except being opposed to harmonization is essentially pro excessive protectionism, which is far closer to Nazism, not to mention essentially pro inefficiency.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:07 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Lordieth wrote: Non-EU members do fine when it comes to trade in Europe.


Which is pretty much twattish free riding on massive efforts by the EU on regulatory and duty harmonisation, but whatever.


Which makes UK politicians who use the 'trade' defence dishonest. So the only real perk of the EU doesn't really exist. I like freedom, but the EU is a bit 'too' left-wing for me. Britain at the moment has to either comply with them or spend millions to explain why it doesn't agree in a legal case, and that'd get us no where. The right for rapists and murderers in prison to get a vote in how our country works? Thanks EU. Lovely freedom contradiction that.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55273
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:13 pm

Lordieth wrote:I hate that we in the UK are in the EU, we don't even get a say in it.


You do actually.

9.72% of the EuroParliament seats
+ 1 Commissioner
+ the (totally inept imho) High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
.

User avatar
Helertia
Minister
 
Posts: 3270
Founded: Nov 28, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Helertia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:15 pm

Lordieth wrote:
Hydesland wrote:
Which is pretty much twattish free riding on massive efforts by the EU on regulatory and duty harmonisation, but whatever.


Which makes UK politicians who use the 'trade' defence dishonest. So the only real perk of the EU doesn't really exist. I like freedom, but the EU is a bit 'too' left-wing for me. Britain at the moment has to either comply with them or spend millions to explain why it doesn't agree in a legal case, and that'd get us no where. The right for rapists and murderers in prison to get a vote in how our country works? Thanks EU. Lovely freedom contradiction that.


Don't know why you're complaining, they'd obviously vote Tory. It's the only party which courts the openly-evil vote.
Do hypocrites hate hypocrisy?

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:44 pm

Call to power wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:This is ridiculous. They are calling for austerity packages from all member nations but continue handing themselves lavish perks.


Politicians vote against taking economy class flight you say!?

This is pathetic

The Matthew Islands wrote:Does anyone even know what MEP's really do and who they are?


they are your elected members of the European Parliament and you are either 12 or not of a sufficient knowledge to be commenting on the affairs of the European Union.

Ah, so MEP's are completely justified in taking Business class flights, earning about 20K more than a British MP and voting against savings of up to 20 million pounds while calling for austerity in member nations?

Also, the individual MEP's aren't elected. The party is elected, we don't get a say in who our individual MEP is unless operating an open list system. I am not sure which parties do in the UK.
You also didn't answer my question. I said what do they do not what are they. Although I have kind of answered my own question after looking around after typing that...
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Helertia wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
Which makes UK politicians who use the 'trade' defence dishonest. So the only real perk of the EU doesn't really exist. I like freedom, but the EU is a bit 'too' left-wing for me. Britain at the moment has to either comply with them or spend millions to explain why it doesn't agree in a legal case, and that'd get us no where. The right for rapists and murderers in prison to get a vote in how our country works? Thanks EU. Lovely freedom contradiction that.


Don't know why you're complaining, they'd obviously vote Tory. It's the only party which courts the openly-evil vote.


It's political vote-buying that concerns me. Prisoners have a biased outlook that politicians could use to gain votes. They aren't in society, so why should they get a vote?
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:00 pm

Lordieth wrote:It's political vote-buying that concerns me. Prisoners have a biased outlook that politicians could use to gain votes. They aren't in society, so why should they get a vote?

Everyone has a biased outlook that politicians could use to gain votes. Prisoners are not a large enough demographic (or even a single demographic) that they could elect anyone on a 'no more police' platform, and anyone not serving a life sentence without parole will be back in society, possibly under a government they had no choice to participate in. I'm not exactly thrilled at the idea, but it's not a one sided thing

User avatar
Siorafrica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1649
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Siorafrica » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:03 pm

Oterro wrote:
Siorafrica wrote:Of course a small group will vote for more money for themselves. The poor are socialist and the rich are capitalist. That's politics. /thread


Isn't Norway socialist?

It's pretty rich too, I think.


I mean rich and poor people rather than rich and poor countries.
NSG Thread Wheel;give it a spin and watch the trainwreck begin. http://cheezburger.com/View/5084656640
A doubleplusgood guide to NSpeak. http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=16895
Population of NationStates. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=138705479531836
Yes by and large NSG for the most part absolutely has nothing but utter unadulterated contempt for religion and those who dare express it openly.-Skibereen
Oi with the arguing in circles over the same tired old topic yet again, and the trolling one another on either side with 'who is a real Christian' and 'why your logic sucks'. How about we put this one to bed again. It's going nowhere. You aren't going to change anyone's minds. Stick a fork in it kids - it's done.-Dread Lady Nathanica

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:07 pm

Siorafrica wrote:
Oterro wrote:
Isn't Norway socialist?

It's pretty rich too, I think.


I mean rich and poor people rather than rich and poor countries.


Ah, okay. What about Bourgeoisie socialists?
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
The Deleted Chris
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1513
Founded: Nov 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deleted Chris » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:09 pm

Helertia wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
Which makes UK politicians who use the 'trade' defence dishonest. So the only real perk of the EU doesn't really exist. I like freedom, but the EU is a bit 'too' left-wing for me. Britain at the moment has to either comply with them or spend millions to explain why it doesn't agree in a legal case, and that'd get us no where. The right for rapists and murderers in prison to get a vote in how our country works? Thanks EU. Lovely freedom contradiction that.


Don't know why you're complaining, they'd obviously vote Tory. It's the only party which courts the openly-evil vote.


Dave doesn't do evil. We've all gone to UKIP.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:14 pm

I agree Unchecked Expansion. My problem is this;

Criminals are taken out of society and put into prison. The vast majority of government deals with society. If criminals are taken out of society because they behave and are motivated to commit criminal actions, then what right do they have to have a say in the society they are currently excluded from? It's more principle than problem to me.

I have no say. None. We have no say about being in the EU, and no say in the laws it passes.

I'm just thankful for a devolved Wales.
Last edited by Lordieth on Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Neu California, Port Carverton, The New York Nation

Advertisement

Remove ads