Camylon wrote:I love that son of a bitch. I want to run my hands through his steely grey hair and kiss his supple lips.
Brüno?
Advertisement
by Wamitoria » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:23 pm
Camylon wrote:I love that son of a bitch. I want to run my hands through his steely grey hair and kiss his supple lips.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:24 pm
Xsyne wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Read the Confederate Constitution much? It established a federative political system. That is to say that Texas, for all its saber rattling, wasn't the Confederacy. It was a single Republic within the Southland. You can read any of the Secession declarations by any of the states and it means nothing when used to levy moral condemnation on the Confederacy as a whole.
That is like saying that since Bill Clinton left office with a budget surplus, all presidents are good with money. Can we logically deduce this?Article 4, Section 3, Clause 3 of the Constitution of the Confederate States of America wrote:The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several Sates; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form States to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory the institution of negro slavery, as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress and by the Territorial government; and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories shall have the right to take to such Territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the States or Territories of the Confederate States.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:28 pm
by Farnhamia » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:28 pm
Distruzio wrote:Terra Agora wrote:
These folks were obviously racist as well weren't they?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Louisiana_Native_Guard_(CSA)
My ancestor was in that regiment.
The South did not use this Confederate Native Guard regiment in any military action, and failed to provide it with uniforms or arms. Most of the men in the unit used their own resources to obtain weapons and uniforms which were displayed in a parade in New Orleans on January 8, 1862. It was largely considered part of the Confederacy's "public relations" campaign. The Native Guard tried to gain notoriety by offering their service to escort Union prisoners, captured from Manassas, through New Orleans. Despite the Confederacy choosing white militiamen instead, the Native Guard still participated in two other grand reviews. When the Louisiana State Legislature passed a law in January 1862 that reorganized the militia by conscripting “all the free white males capable of bearing arms… irrespective of nationality”, the 1st Louisiana Native Guard was also affected. It was forced to disband on February 15, 1862, and many of its white officers reassigned to the new Confederate regiments.
by Xsyne » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:28 pm
Distruzio wrote:Xsyne wrote:
Which explains that they were pro-slave... not racist. As I said, when a gov't is threatening your livelihood, wouldn't you get a little pissy and buck back? The morality of the foundation of you economy be damned, it was the economy that they had. Any threat to limit it's growth was a threat to limit their prosperity. On top of that, Lincoln demanded the Morrill Tarriffbe collected. So strangle their economy from two directions and they are the bad guys for firing the first shots?
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Wikkiwallana » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:28 pm
Distruzio wrote:Xsyne wrote:
Which explains that they were pro-slave... not racist. As I said, when a gov't is threatening your livelihood, wouldn't you get a little pissy and buck back? The morality of the foundation of you economy be damned, it was the economy that they had. Any threat to limit it's growth was a threat to limit their prosperity. On top of that, Lincoln demanded the Morrill Tarriffbe collected. So strangle their economy from two directions and they are the bad guys for firing the first shots?
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Xsyne » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:29 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Sorratsin » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:29 pm
Distruzio wrote:Xsyne wrote:
Which explains that they were pro-slave... not racist. As I said, when a gov't is threatening your livelihood, wouldn't you get a little pissy and buck back? The morality of the foundation of you economy be damned, it was the economy that they had. Any threat to limit it's growth was a threat to limit their prosperity. On top of that, Lincoln demanded the Morrill Tarriffbe collected. So strangle their economy from two directions and they are the bad guys for firing the first shots?
by Terra Agora » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:33 pm
Sorratsin wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Which explains that they were pro-slave... not racist. As I said, when a gov't is threatening your livelihood, wouldn't you get a little pissy and buck back? The morality of the foundation of you economy be damned, it was the economy that they had. Any threat to limit it's growth was a threat to limit their prosperity. On top of that, Lincoln demanded the Morrill Tarriffbe collected. So strangle their economy from two directions and they are the bad guys for firing the first shots?
I'm so dreadfully sorry that black people's right to not get beaten to death is so troubling to your bottom line.
by Xsyne » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:33 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Wamitoria » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:33 pm
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:35 pm
Sorratsin wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Which explains that they were pro-slave... not racist. As I said, when a gov't is threatening your livelihood, wouldn't you get a little pissy and buck back? The morality of the foundation of you economy be damned, it was the economy that they had. Any threat to limit it's growth was a threat to limit their prosperity. On top of that, Lincoln demanded the Morrill Tarriffbe collected. So strangle their economy from two directions and they are the bad guys for firing the first shots?
I'm so dreadfully sorry that black people's right to not get beaten to death is so troubling to your bottom line.
by Terra Agora » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:36 pm
by Terra Agora » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:37 pm
by CIB EMPIRE » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:42 pm
Farnhamia wrote:
We need to read our sources rather more closely:The South did not use this Confederate Native Guard regiment in any military action, and failed to provide it with uniforms or arms. Most of the men in the unit used their own resources to obtain weapons and uniforms which were displayed in a parade in New Orleans on January 8, 1862. It was largely considered part of the Confederacy's "public relations" campaign. The Native Guard tried to gain notoriety by offering their service to escort Union prisoners, captured from Manassas, through New Orleans. Despite the Confederacy choosing white militiamen instead, the Native Guard still participated in two other grand reviews. When the Louisiana State Legislature passed a law in January 1862 that reorganized the militia by conscripting “all the free white males capable of bearing arms… irrespective of nationality”, the 1st Louisiana Native Guard was also affected. It was forced to disband on February 15, 1862, and many of its white officers reassigned to the new Confederate regiments.
by Wikkiwallana » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:42 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Sibirsky » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:44 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Distruzio wrote:
If I were to trade in one of my ounces of gold right now I'd receive back more than $1400. If I had traded in one of my ounces of gold in 2001, I'd have received just over $200. The economy would persist. Quite well actually. What was that main reason?
That's not what he meant and you should know it if you genuinely advocate a gold standard. The US dollar of mined gold in the world is not equal to even half the dollar value of the US yearly economy.
Sibirsky wrote:Xsyne wrote:The US economy alone contains more money than every speck of gold every mined on the planet is worth by a gargantuan margin. Going on the gold standard would literally erase half of all wealth in the country, and that's assuming that the US could acquire all the gold beforehand. If we limit it just to the gold the US has in its reserves, we would see 96% of our wealth disappear in the blink of an eye. We're not talking depression here, we're talking "the economy no longer exists" here.
Oh, and that's not even the main reason why just about every economist alive thinks going back on the gold standard is a completely idiotic move.
That's bullshit. Going on the gold standard would not make the economy disappear. What gives you that preposterous idea? Factories would vanish amirite?
The value of all the gold ever mined is less than the US economy priced in fiat US dollars. Had we been on a gold standard all along, the nominal price of an item would be less.
by Terra Agora » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:46 pm
Farnhamia wrote:
We need to read our sources rather more closely:The South did not use this Confederate Native Guard regiment in any military action, and failed to provide it with uniforms or arms. Most of the men in the unit used their own resources to obtain weapons and uniforms which were displayed in a parade in New Orleans on January 8, 1862. It was largely considered part of the Confederacy's "public relations" campaign. The Native Guard tried to gain notoriety by offering their service to escort Union prisoners, captured from Manassas, through New Orleans. Despite the Confederacy choosing white militiamen instead, the Native Guard still participated in two other grand reviews. When the Louisiana State Legislature passed a law in January 1862 that reorganized the militia by conscripting “all the free white males capable of bearing arms… irrespective of nationality”, the 1st Louisiana Native Guard was also affected. It was forced to disband on February 15, 1862, and many of its white officers reassigned to the new Confederate regiments.
by Terra Agora » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:50 pm
by Wikkiwallana » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:51 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:52 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Wikkiwallana wrote:That's not what he meant and you should know it if you genuinely advocate a gold standard. The US dollar of mined gold in the world is not equal to even half the dollar value of the US yearly economy.
Relevance?Sibirsky wrote:That's bullshit. Going on the gold standard would not make the economy disappear. What gives you that preposterous idea? Factories would vanish amirite?
The value of all the gold ever mined is less than the US economy priced in fiat US dollars. Had we been on a gold standard all along, the nominal price of an item would be less.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:55 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Terra Agora wrote:I wouldn't say they were forced.
Im not going to say all relationships between "slave" and "master' where good but from what I read a lot of slaves liked their "masters".
How many of those were being described by the master, or a slave while still serving a master?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Derntill, Dutch Socialist States, Duvniask, Eahland, Experina, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Luminesa, Luziyca, Nu Elysium, Petrokovia, Souverain Revachol, Valyxias, Vussul, Xind, Zancostan, Zandos, Zurkerx
Advertisement