NATION

PASSWORD

The World is a Matriarchy!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Freelanderness
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10526
Founded: Feb 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Freelanderness » Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:51 pm

This is funny because it stereotypes both genders so much.

If you really want to have a discussion on the roles of men and women, you must take into consideration that people do not follow stereotypes.
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ¡¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon
"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)
Alleniana wrote:
New Manvir wrote:Well, it's obvious the Native Americans didn't really have a history. They were just loafing about, waiting for some white people to show up so the real fun could start.

The party don't start till I walk in
-Tik Tok, by Christopher Columbus

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:03 pm

Pasig wrote:
Risottia wrote:What you think is immaterial since facts point otherwise. Google could be your friend, you know.


Oh yeah, because women don't suffer from guilt and shame for being victims of a rape. Never happened that, no way.
:palm:


I know they DO commit assaults. But, I am pretty sure they happen very rarely. You could use date-rape drug and a bit of viagra.
Or, get a strap-on and go for a guys arse. But, it's difficult, however kinky it may be.

And, I think women have less of a stigma that they were over-powered by a man, than a man claiming they were over-powered and raped by a woman.

So, face-palm to you, too: :palm:

Not with me. It would be easy.

But, you are actually rather missing the point. Just because rape of men by women happens rarely/irregularly does not make it any less severe.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
New Korongo
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6019
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Korongo » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:56 pm

I am guessing you consider homosexuals the rebels

This thread has so much "WTF are you talking about" potential
Last edited by New Korongo on Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:37 pm

Terra Agora wrote:(Image)

I have to agree.

Ha ha! :lol2:

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:51 pm

Epic satire is epic satire.

Epic troll is epic troll.

*STAMP OF APPROVAL* :rofl:
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
The Atlantean Menace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1283
Founded: Mar 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Atlantean Menace » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:28 pm

Caecili wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Ha. Posts like this make me want to become a misogynist.


Same here, and I'm a fucking girl.


Some of the most virulent misogynists I know are female.

User avatar
The Soviet Technocracy
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6371
Founded: Dec 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Soviet Technocracy » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:30 pm

I just read down to the second sentence and then skipped the entire post looking for a tl;dr, which I did not find.

So I'm going to say this:

OP is misandrist and misogynist.

There, I can't be wrong.
New Nicksyllvania - Unjustly Deleted 4/2/11
I love Rebecca Black

User avatar
The Atlantean Menace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1283
Founded: Mar 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Atlantean Menace » Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:08 pm

The Soviet Technocracy wrote:I just read down to the second sentence and then skipped the entire post looking for a tl;dr, which I did not find.

So I'm going to say this:

OP is misandrist and misogynist.

There, I can't be wrong.


You're right, but you really should've put "and/or," which actually would guarantee that you can't be wrong.

Well, depending on whether or not you consider "the world is a patriarchy!" to be a misandrist argument. If you don't, then this argument is no more inherently miso-anything.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:41 pm

I have heard that most of the really big money, major fortunes, in this country is controlled by women.

We hear about Warren Buffet and Bill Gates because they are newsworthy, but meanwhile all these rich widows are really pulling the strings.

This source says that wealthy widows do not dissipate their inheritances, but survive their husbands by 13 years on average and leave a personal estate twice as large as their original inheritance from their husband,
http://books.google.com/books?id=pYNauz ... &q&f=false
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:51 pm

The Soviet Technocracy wrote:I just read down to the second sentence and then skipped the entire post looking for a tl;dr, which I did not find.

So I'm going to say this:

OP is misandrist and misogynist.

There, I can't be wrong.


Or, I like both men and women, and want to see more fairness (rather than seeming like a character full of hatred).

User avatar
Josh Sinister
Diplomat
 
Posts: 764
Founded: Nov 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Josh Sinister » Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:06 am

I'm smart enough (along with everyone else) to just compartmentalize the part that wants to sleep with da beetches; without affecting when I just talk to women. You're theory would mean that all I do is think about sex.

Also, I've never really felt compelled to be manly. I'm home-schooled (From when I was like 5), so I think that people never really had the time for it. Besides, men who actually are compelled to be manly (especially to that catroony extent) are chiefly motivated to rape.

That and this seems kind of misandrist...

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:26 pm

Josh Sinister wrote:I'm smart enough (along with everyone else) to just compartmentalize the part that wants to sleep with da beetches; without affecting when I just talk to women. You're theory would mean that all I do is think about sex.

Also, I've never really felt compelled to be manly. I'm home-schooled (From when I was like 5), so I think that people never really had the time for it. Besides, men who actually are compelled to be manly (especially to that catroony extent) are chiefly motivated to rape.

That and this seems kind of misandrist...


I am making generalisations.
I am pretty sure that the intellectual online community that we are, does not apply to what I said.

However, we are very much a minority in the world ladies and gentlemen. May you remember that before you take whatever I say very personally.

User avatar
The Atlantean Menace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1283
Founded: Mar 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Atlantean Menace » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:42 pm

I don't think I've ever seen anyone who managed to simultaneous troll the ultra angry female chauvinism branch of feminism, the perfectly sane branch of feminism, and men at the same time.

:clap:

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Thu Mar 31, 2011 1:08 am

The Atlantean Menace wrote:I don't think I've ever seen anyone who managed to simultaneous troll the ultra angry female chauvinism branch of feminism, the perfectly sane branch of feminism, and men at the same time.

:clap:

Does having both extremes make me neutral?

User avatar
Set the Unbound
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1212
Founded: Oct 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Set the Unbound » Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:01 am

Pasig wrote:
The Atlantean Menace wrote:I don't think I've ever seen anyone who managed to simultaneous troll the ultra angry female chauvinism branch of feminism, the perfectly sane branch of feminism, and men at the same time.

:clap:

Does having both extremes make me neutral?


No, it makes you the winner.

:bow:

Image
Last edited by Set the Unbound on Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
"If two men agree on everything, you may be sure one of them is doing the thinking"
- Lyndon B. Johnson

"Homosexuality is observed in over a thousand species of animals. Homophobia is observed in only one."
- "Marmalade Skies and Tangerine Trees"

User avatar
Zilam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 828
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zilam » Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:07 am

I agree 100%!!!!*


* Didn't actually read much of the TrololOP
I'm not who I was.

User avatar
The Atlantean Menace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1283
Founded: Mar 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Atlantean Menace » Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:00 am

Set the Unbound wrote:
Pasig wrote:Does having both extremes make me neutral?


No, it makes you the winner.

:bow:

Image


The word "Controversial" is misspelled on there. Very trollish.

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:06 pm

The Atlantean Menace wrote:
Set the Unbound wrote:
No, it makes you the winner.

:bow:


The word "Controversial" is misspelled on there. Very trollish.


Ha ha ha ha! :lol2:
Nice to receive a trophy, though.

User avatar
Germonica
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Sep 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Germonica » Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:13 pm

Yeah girls really use their brains in fights, you know, cause it never turns into a shouting match with both ladies shouting false things and sounding fucking retarded. But yes, bow to the girls, because you know, there has been a women president and a women vice president right?
DEFCON LEVEL 4: Increased intelligence watch and strengthened security measures.
For Germonica and the Human Race!

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:19 pm

Germonica wrote:Yeah girls really use their brains in fights, you know, cause it never turns into a shouting match with both ladies shouting false things and sounding fucking retarded. But yes, bow to the girls, because you know, there has been a women president and a women vice president right?


I'm sure Obama is pwned by his wife. If she says: take out the trash, he'll do it.
If he says it, she'll tell him to get lost, go into a funny mood, and then make Obama feel like he did something wrong all night.

In fact, why would a woman even bother to become president? They can just let their pet man do all that work for her, whilst she reaps in all the benefits.
A man may feel powerful among others, but as soon as he goes home, he's just a woman's dog

Domination by women.
Last edited by Pasig on Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Britcan
Senator
 
Posts: 3961
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Britcan » Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:26 pm

Pasig wrote:Then, it goes onto school. Boys are encouraged to play rough-and-tumble games. Whereas, girls are told to play more sophisticated games.
Because talking about who has the nicest earrings and taunting each other behind their backs is very sophisticated. It's not like boys are always fighting either, from my experience the boys usually play cards while the girls dare each other to do stupid things.

This nation should not be taken to be representative of my real-life views, nor should any of the nonsense I posted on here as a teenager.

User avatar
Eliasonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2144
Founded: Oct 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Eliasonia » Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:43 pm

Pasig wrote:
Germonica wrote:Yeah girls really use their brains in fights, you know, cause it never turns into a shouting match with both ladies shouting false things and sounding fucking retarded. But yes, bow to the girls, because you know, there has been a women president and a women vice president right?


I'm sure Obama is pwned by his wife. If she says: take out the trash, he'll do it.
If he says it, she'll tell him to get lost, go into a funny mood, and then make Obama feel like he did something wrong all night.

In fact, why would a woman even bother to become president? They can just let their pet man do all that work for her, whilst she reaps in all the benefits.
A man may feel powerful among others, but as soon as he goes home, he's just a woman's dog

Domination by women.

Or he could have half a brain like most other men and tell his wife to go eat shit and suck a dick if she is guilty of blatant manipulation, but apparently in the sexist cesspool that is your head anyone who has a penis is for some reason incapable of having a personality or free will. Tell me, when was your last relationship and how long did it last before you were thrown out the door?
╬ The Iron Party ╬
Liberals: Promoting Freedom, unless it's guns, hunting, tobacco, food, what you can drive, how much money you can make, what you can say, and where you can pray
Maineiacs wrote:There once was a man from Belfast
Whose balls were constructed of brass.
In stormy weather
They'd clang together
And lightening shot out of his ass. :D

New East Ireland wrote:
East germanias wrote:no"
*continues to cry*

*Gives a stuffed Hath doll*
Here you go.. When you squeeze its weenier, it talks and shoots fire from it's eyes..

Mushet wrote:
Necro-Paroom wrote:*Leaks pus*

*leaks cum*
:blush: I'm just very excited to be here
Economic Left/Right: 3.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31
Political Test

User avatar
Pasig
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Feb 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pasig » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:37 am

Still in one and am about to celebrate my second anniversary.

User avatar
The Burgundy Plains
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Apr 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Burgundy Plains » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:52 am

That's absolutely not true... guys are getting shafted in school starting with elementary due to female teachers playing favorites with female students, but men are simply biologically dealt a better hand to allow them to overtake their female counterparts in thinking capacity. Is every male smarter than every female? No of course not, work ethic has a lot to do with it. But in theory male brain development is geared towards higher thinking to a greater extent than the female brain. So, if any gender was meant to be "the brain" (which is absurd) it would theoretically be the male gender. I'm against the idea of either gender being a slave to the other because a bunch of men with no women can accomplish just as much as a bunch of women with no men (birthing-wise). There have definitely been different social expectations of each gender throughout the milennia. For a long time women were not expected to work and if they did it was the sign of either a poor household or a lazy husband. For a long time in Britain and America women could not be sued in court (you had to sue their husband or father and if she had none she became a ward of the state and you sued THEM. Yeah women couldn't be sued no matter what.) but then again they could not sue either (yep, had to get their husband/father/son to do it). But social expectations also required that, no matter WHAT was in his will, if a man had daughters a portion of his estate was always divided between them upon his death. Even if he disinherited them. It was also considered impolite to sit when a woman entered the room, to leave a woman un-escorted, to allow a woman to open a door herself etc. etc. etc. It wasn't unequal, there were just different expectations and social expectancies cut both ways. In the South you could be arrested for cursing in the presence of a woman for a while or even for whistling at her. Women chose to give up some of the politeness/courtesies for political and economic equality. That's fine. Just don't expect to make off with both.
The Burgundy Plains is a kingdom that is client to the Security Syndicate of the Black Plains, to whom it owes a great deal of money. If someone would be willing to RP a liberation of the Burgundy Plains, that would be awesome :D. TG The Burgundy Plains or The Black Plains (obviously this is a puppet). The Burgundy Plains rp's with a population of two-hundred million.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163942
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:56 am

Bonobo society is matriarchal. Conflicts within that society are solved not with violence(usually), but with sex. I'll just leave this here.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ImperialRussia, Likhinia, New Temecula, Singaporen Empire, Spirit of Hope

Advertisement

Remove ads