Who would win?

[British Prussia]

Well in that case, I say USA would win. We are technologically superior, we outspend China on our defenses, and we just have better war and battle planners. China may have a larger military when it comes to troop size, but I don't think that'd really be that big of a factor.

And who in the world would ally with China? I don't even think Kim Jong is that mentally ill.

The Chinese military is far more disciplined. And American logistics are... well almost useless...
North Korea will join China, everyone knows tht North Korea hates America. (and practically most of the world 2, but their nice).

[Capitalist Arcadia]

Well in that case, I say USA would win. We are technologically superior, we outspend China on our defenses, and we just have better war and battle planners. China may have a larger military when it comes to troop size, but I don't think that'd really be that big of a factor.

And who in the world would ally with China? I don't even think Kim Jong is that mentally ill.

The Chinese military is far more disciplined. And American logistics are... well almost useless...
North Korea will join China, everyone knows tht North Korea hates America. (and practically most of the world 2, but their nice).

I doubt it. I believe most free nations would stand by the U.S. Because if China took down the U.S. then there really would be no one to stand up for the rest of the free world. The Chinese would roll right over the others. The free world would stand and fight I think.

[The Parkus Empire]

I doubt it. I believe most free nations would stand by the U.S. Because if China took down the U.S. then there really would be no one to stand up for the rest of the free world. The Chinese would roll right over the others. The free world would stand and fight I think.

A-yup. And it's funny hearing people talk here like countries are that independent of each other. If the U.S. lost this war, or was forced to fight if for too long, Europe's economy would collapse in unimaginable depression.

[Capitalist Arcadia]

I doubt it. I believe most free nations would stand by the U.S. Because if China took down the U.S. then there really would be no one to stand up for the rest of the free world. The Chinese would roll right over the others. The free world would stand and fight I think.

A-yup. And it's funny hearing people talk here like countries are that independent of each other. If the U.S. lost this war, or was forced to fight if for too long, Europe's economy would collapse in unimaginable depression.

Yeah it sure would. I believe the majority of the world...hell maybe even the damn russians...would take up for America.

[The Parkus Empire]

The Chinese military is far more disciplined.

Sauce, please.

[Polythinia]

North Korea? China's only has one flaccid little ally? NORTH FREAKING KOREA?!!?

[Caparroz]

God I hate both of these countries.
But considering how many allies the US would have I think they would almost certainly win.

[British Prussia]

The Chinese military is far more disciplined.

Sauce, please.

Well, the professional army, not the conscripts.
American soldiers are fine, they practically represent the modern world standard, but logistics and efficiency is what they lack.

[The Parkus Empire]

North Korea? China's only has one flaccid little ally? NORTH FREAKING KOREA?!!?

Who else could be a possible ally? And I don't even think NK is that stupid, not matter how much it hates the U.S., it's not willing to destroy itself for China, whom it doesn't particularly love.

[Ifreann]

Isn't there some saying about a land war in China?

[The Parkus Empire]

Well, the professional army, not the conscripts.

Sauce, please.

American soldiers are fine, they practically represent the modern world standard, but logistics and efficiency is what they lack.

Mmhm. But I don't know if China is great in this regard, itself.

[The Parkus Empire]

Isn't there some saying about a land war in China?

Asia.

And yeah, like I said, an invasion of China wouldn't work.

[British Prussia]

God I hate both of these countries.
But considering how many allies the US would have I think they would almost certainly win.

Well, I know that New Zealand (just one example here, dunno what its like in other nations such as Australia) is dependant on Chinese economy...
Then again, the US could provide us with the thing we need just as well...

[Satirius]

The Chinese military is far more disciplined.

Sauce, please.

Well, the professional army, not the conscripts.
American soldiers are fine, they practically represent the modern world standard, but logistics and efficiency is what they lack.

Wat

Explain the whole "bases all around the world so that C-17's can get anywhere quickly" part is a lack of logistical power. Explain why how pushed an army of gas-guzzling Abrams tanks to Baghdad twice in less than six weeks each.

[Capitalist Arcadia]

God I hate both of these countries.
But considering how many allies the US would have I think they would almost certainly win.

Well, I know that New Zealand (just one example here, dunno what its like in other nations such as Australia) is dependant on Chinese economy...
Then again, the US could provide us with the thing we need just as well...

New Zealand and Australia would side with the U.S. They did in WWII and I'm sure would rather have the U.S. survive than China

[The Parkus Empire]

Wat

Explain the whole "bases all around the world so that C-17's can get anywhere quickly" part is a lack of logistical power. Explain why how pushed an army of gas-guzzling Abrams tanks to Baghdad twice in less than six weeks each.

Yeah, I much suspect that while we can send Marines anywhere in world in under a hundred hours, and keep them well-supplied for years, China would be slow in deploying, and would probably have to pillage.

[The Parkus Empire]

New Zealand and Australia would side with the U.S. They did in WWII and I'm sure would rather have the U.S. survive than China

If China beat the U.S., chances are it would consider expanding into those areas, too.

[Capitalist Arcadia]

New Zealand and Australia would side with the U.S. They did in WWII and I'm sure would rather have the U.S. survive than China

If China beat the U.S., chances are it would consider expanding into those areas, too.

They would probly not stop expanding. Another reason why the majority of the world would stand and fight with the U.S.

[British Prussia]

Well, the professional army, not the conscripts.

Sauce, please.

American soldiers are fine, they practically represent the modern world standard, but logistics and efficiency is what they lack.

Mmhm. But I don't know if China is great in this regard, itself.

China is pretty much a dictatorship, and if you're a dictatorship, you must have a powerful army
China doesn't need to be that great, they got the numbers, and if there even is friendly fire, i'm sure they can afford the losses.

[Polythinia]

New Zealand and Australia would side with the U.S. They did in WWII and I'm sure would rather have the U.S. survive than China

If China beat the U.S., chances are it would consider expanding into those areas, too.

What sort of "expansion"?

[Capitalist Arcadia]

Well, the professional army, not the conscripts.

Sauce, please.

American soldiers are fine, they practically represent the modern world standard, but logistics and efficiency is what they lack.

Mmhm. But I don't know if China is great in this regard, itself.

China is pretty much a dictatorship, and if you're a dictatorship, you must have a powerful army
China doesn't need to be that great, they got the numbers, and if there even is friendly fire, i'm sure they can afford the losses.

Your reasoning just isn't making sense to me. There are LOTS of dictatorships around the world right now...and they don't all have powerful armies. And those numbers are made up of poorly trained conscripts. It would take some time before they could be mobilized.

[The Parkus Empire]

China is pretty much a dictatorship, and if you're a dictatorship, you must have a powerful army

Lolno. There are plenty of dictatorship governments with shit armies, and the U.S. military is structured as a dictatorship, anyhow.

China doesn't need to be that great, they got the numbers, and if there even is friendly fire, i'm sure they can afford the losses.

They'd be crushed. How could they support their military? The war would cut-off all of their resources.

[The Parkus Empire]

What sort of "expansion"?

[British Prussia]

New Zealand and Australia would side with the U.S. They did in WWII and I'm sure would rather have the U.S. survive than China

If China beat the U.S., chances are it would consider expanding into those areas, too.

They would probly not stop expanding. Another reason why the majority of the world would stand and fight with the U.S.

Possibly... but China doesn't seem to be a kind of Imperial Japan type aggression...
But if the U.S. win, who will be the puppet?

[Capitalist Arcadia]

New Zealand and Australia would side with the U.S. They did in WWII and I'm sure would rather have the U.S. survive than China

If China beat the U.S., chances are it would consider expanding into those areas, too.

They would probly not stop expanding. Another reason why the majority of the world would stand and fight with the U.S.

Possibly... but China doesn't seem to be a kind of Imperial Japan type aggression...
But if the U.S. win, who will be the puppet?

If the U.S. was out of the way what would stop them from becoming like old Imperial Japan?