NATION

PASSWORD

English votes for English laws

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Aemen
Envoy
 
Posts: 209
Founded: Mar 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Aemen » Tue Dec 16, 2014 8:21 am

I really don't like this conundrum of an aftershock the Scottish Referendum has created.

I'm not a fan of creating two classes of MPs in England, the fiscal dedication needed for such an endeavour makes my inner miser froth with rage. I personally support a 'fourth reading' in the Commons for laws affecting England only, making English MPs the only ones able to vote on laws that have passed the three previous readings.

Of course, such a proposal would need more scrutiny. Should the Opposition hold a greater majority in England than the ruling government, they could strain the process by making it harder for the party in charge to fulfil their election promises.

The West Lothian question is going to be a persistent issue that's going to dog the next government in my opinion, one that's going to need cross-party coordination if an answer is ever going to come into effect.

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Tue Dec 16, 2014 8:25 am

Aemen wrote:I really don't like this conundrum of an aftershock the Scottish Referendum has created.

I'm not a fan of creating two classes of MPs in England, the fiscal dedication needed for such an endeavour makes my inner miser froth with rage. I personally support a 'fourth reading' in the Commons for laws affecting England only, making English MPs the only ones able to vote on laws that have passed the three previous readings.


And there would be never-ending debates about the validity of laws being English only in the vast vast majority of cases. It's unworkable.

User avatar
Nazis in Space
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11714
Founded: Aug 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazis in Space » Tue Dec 16, 2014 8:55 am

I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Dec 16, 2014 8:59 am

Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

Thus cementing Yorkshires dominance of the UK e' by gum lad I think y' may be on t' summin :P

EDIT: ah well in a position to vie for dominance anyway Even with that tiny spit of land London still has more people in it :(
Last edited by Olivaero on Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:02 am, edited 2 times in total.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Fortschritte
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1693
Founded: Nov 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fortschritte » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:07 am

Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.


Jesus, that'd be a clusterfuck.
Fortschritte IIWiki |The Player Behind Fort
Moderate Centre Rightist, Ordoliberal, Pro LGBT, Social Liberal
OOC Pros & Cons | Fort's Political Party Rankings(Updated)
Political Things I've Written
Japan: Land of the Rising Debt | Explaining the West German Economic Miracle
Economic Left/Right: 1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.41

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:12 am

Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

People sure love this suffix -shire there.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:14 am

Olivaero wrote:
Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

Thus cementing Yorkshires dominance of the UK e' by gum lad I think y' may be on t' summin :P

EDIT: ah well in a position to vie for dominance anyway Even with that tiny spit of land London still has more people in it :(

The funny thing about Yorkshire is that people pronounce "Yorkshire [terrier]" with an "eye" vowel, I have to correct them that it's pronounced with "er" and they never believe me.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Thus cementing Yorkshires dominance of the UK e' by gum lad I think y' may be on t' summin :P

EDIT: ah well in a position to vie for dominance anyway Even with that tiny spit of land London still has more people in it :(

The funny thing about Yorkshire is that people pronounce "Yorkshire [terrier]" with an "eye" vowel, I have to correct them that it's pronounced with "er" and they never believe me.

Actually with some versions of our accent it's closer to "Ear" as in "Fear" although plenty of people do sound it "Er"
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:37 am

Olivaero wrote:Actually with some versions of our accent it's closer to "Ear" as in "Fear" although plenty of people do sound it "Er"

Still not Yorkshyer or Yorkshyddy. :P
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Fortschritte
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1693
Founded: Nov 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fortschritte » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:40 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

People sure love this suffix -shire there.


It looks as if there are more shires than not.
Fortschritte IIWiki |The Player Behind Fort
Moderate Centre Rightist, Ordoliberal, Pro LGBT, Social Liberal
OOC Pros & Cons | Fort's Political Party Rankings(Updated)
Political Things I've Written
Japan: Land of the Rising Debt | Explaining the West German Economic Miracle
Economic Left/Right: 1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.41

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:40 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Actually with some versions of our accent it's closer to "Ear" as in "Fear" although plenty of people do sound it "Er"

Still not Yorkshyer or Yorkshyddy. :P

Yeah... I blame Lord of the Rings! Although I have got to ask.... what is Yorkshyddy? 0.o
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:44 am

Olivaero wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Still not Yorkshyer or Yorkshyddy. :P

Yeah... I blame Lord of the Rings! Although I have got to ask.... what is Yorkshyddy? 0.o

Brazilians mispronouncing "Yorkshire".

An "e" vowel at the end of a word is clearly an unstressed /e/ that is obviously always [i], doesn't matter the language, English stressed i is obviously always [aj].
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:50 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Yeah... I blame Lord of the Rings! Although I have got to ask.... what is Yorkshyddy? 0.o

Brazilians mispronouncing "Yorkshire".

An "e" vowel at the end of a word is clearly an unstressed /e/ that is obviously always [i], doesn't matter the language, English stressed i is obviously always [aj].

Yeah I'm just confused as to where the "dd" comes from... is that a common way to pronounce r's in Brazilian?
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:51 am

Olivaero wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Brazilians mispronouncing "Yorkshire".

An "e" vowel at the end of a word is clearly an unstressed /e/ that is obviously always [i], doesn't matter the language, English stressed i is obviously always [aj].

Yeah I'm just confused as to where the "dd" comes from... is that a common way to pronounce r's in Brazilian?

I meant the Spanish/Portuguese tap. The closest English sound is the American pronunciation of /t/ and /d/ in letter and ladder.

Some Brazilians indeed have retroflex tap, flap and approximant allophones for the tap phoneme, though, but that'd earn you a "hick" epithet in Rio. Well, by mean people.
Last edited by Degenerate Heart of HetRio on Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6764
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:23 am

Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

Fuck that noise.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:26 am

Of course it's far from perfect, but it should be a stopgap before a more permanent constitutional settlement is hammered out, especially if more powers are devolved to Scotland in the meantime. Labour oppose it even as a stopgap measure because they fear they'll be left with a minority (or worse) in England at the next election and want to be able to rely on their Scottish MPs, or as is now more likely, their SNP coalition partners, to ram through their agenda on English-only affairs. And that'll inevitably create five years (or more) of 2006-7 style animosity between the English and the Scots, and leave the Union in an even more precarious state than it is now (and that's saying something).
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:01 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Yeah I'm just confused as to where the "dd" comes from... is that a common way to pronounce r's in Brazilian?

I meant the Spanish/Portuguese tap. The closest English sound is the American pronunciation of /t/ and /d/ in letter and ladder.

Some Brazilians indeed have retroflex tap, flap and approximant allophones for the tap phoneme, though, but that'd earn you a "hick" epithet in Rio. Well, by mean people.

Ah okay


Angleter wrote:Of course it's far from perfect, but it should be a stopgap before a more permanent constitutional settlement is hammered out, especially if more powers are devolved to Scotland in the meantime. Labour oppose it even as a stopgap measure because they fear they'll be left with a minority (or worse) in England at the next election and want to be able to rely on their Scottish MPs, or as is now more likely, their SNP coalition partners, to ram through their agenda on English-only affairs. And that'll inevitably create five years (or more) of 2006-7 style animosity between the English and the Scots, and leave the Union in an even more precarious state than it is now (and that's saying something).


Thats probably one of the reasons labour oppose it but considering how Westminster is to ever change the constitutional make up of the country I'd say it's a valid fear that the "stopgap" measure will become the status quo and then the conservatives and perhaps blue labour will fight tooth and nail to retain it. Waiting until after net election will provide a much clearer mandate for what type of constitutional change people want to see in any case.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:05 am

All this shows why we need an English Parliament or no devolution to anywhere at all. It's all confusing. Not that I'd back one now. Way too expensive.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
The Lotophagi
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 385
Founded: Nov 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Lotophagi » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:09 am

Fortschritte wrote:
Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.


Jesus, that'd be a clusterfuck.


Nonsense. Why, it just harkens back to the golden age of English history back in the 7th century!

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13735
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:14 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Just let Brussels run everything, sorted.


I think they're too busy poking the Russians and standardizing fruit shapes to take this on at the moment.

Standardizing fruit shapes originally had a good reason, though.
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...
The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
"Boys and girls so happy, young and gay / Don't let false worldly joy carry your hearts away."

See the Jutean language! Talk to me about all. Avian air force flag (via) Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55315
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:26 am

Ifreann wrote:
Risottia wrote:Or jus move the caipital awa frae London tae Edinburgh an make the Scottish parliament responsible fer everything British.

Ooh, move the capital to the Falklands!

Even better. Move the capital to Buenos Aires, and then send the RN to reclaim the capital of the United Kingdom from the Argentine unlawful occupiers.
.

User avatar
Neragua
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Jun 22, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Neragua » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:30 am

IMHO: establish an English Parliament equal in power to the Scottish Parliament. As with the letter, devolve all but national policy areas (economy, defence, foreign affairs, constitutional affairs, etc). Elect English Parliament in the same manner as Scotland's too. Then half the size of the Westminster Parliament.

Voilà.
Last edited by Neragua on Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Falklands Forever! "Malvinas" Never!

User avatar
Fortschritte
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1693
Founded: Nov 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fortschritte » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:32 am

Britanno wrote:All this shows why we need an English Parliament or no devolution to anywhere at all. It's all confusing. Not that I'd back one now. Way too expensive.


I fail to see why it's way too expensive.
Fortschritte IIWiki |The Player Behind Fort
Moderate Centre Rightist, Ordoliberal, Pro LGBT, Social Liberal
OOC Pros & Cons | Fort's Political Party Rankings(Updated)
Political Things I've Written
Japan: Land of the Rising Debt | Explaining the West German Economic Miracle
Economic Left/Right: 1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.41

User avatar
Neragua
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Jun 22, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Neragua » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:37 am

Britanno wrote:All this shows why we need an English Parliament or no devolution to anywhere at all. It's all confusing. Not that I'd back one now. Way too expensive.

I agree. However, devolution is a one way street: once it's given, it won't be returned. Therefore, let's make the relationship amongst the UK home countries equal and devolve equally.

I'd prefer no devolution at all but as I've said, that's a closed road.
Falklands Forever! "Malvinas" Never!

User avatar
Neragua
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Jun 22, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Neragua » Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:42 am

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Nazis in Space wrote:I for one suggest that each of these gets its own parliament and decides on its own laws.

Fuck that noise.

I also doubt places like Banffshire would be able to raise the revenue required to run the place.

Alas, I'm not sure Nazis in Space's post was without sarcasm.
Last edited by Neragua on Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Falklands Forever! "Malvinas" Never!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Abarri, Aggicificicerous, Ancientania, Cinnaa, El Lazaro, Eurocom, Fort Viorlia, Heldervin, Ifreann, Juristonia, Kubra, Port Carverton, Repreteop, Sarduri, Sarolandia, The Lone Alliance, The Plough Islands

Advertisement

Remove ads