NATION

PASSWORD

Statistics Don't Support Rape Culture

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
-The Unified Earth Governments-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12215
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby -The Unified Earth Governments- » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:53 pm

Shit, I remember the OP now....

Sorry for the off topic.
FactbookHistoryColoniesEmbassy Program V.IIUNSC Navy (WIP)InfantryAmmo Mods
/// A.N.N. \\\
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.

The Most Important Issue Result - "Robosexual marriages are increasingly common."

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:56 pm

I'm sorry, the part about groups not wanting to end sexual assault because of the money involved is to conspiracy-riden for me. Is big rape culture right up there with big business now?

I mean how ridiculous to compare sexual assault to smoking. Clearly if a crime that has been committed since the dawn of time hasn't been eliminated its because of corruption in the awareness groups. Otherwise it would be in decline just like cigarettes right?

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:57 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Marcurix wrote:
Bullshit.

Not according to the CDC
The specific types of sexual violence assessed included rape (completed or attempted forced penetration or alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration) and sexual violence other than rape, including being made to penetrate a perpetrator, sexual coercion (nonphysically pressured unwanted penetration), unwanted sexual contact (e.g., kissing or fondling), and noncontact unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., being flashed or forced to view sexually explicit media).


Great, now give me the actual legal definition of rape.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

User avatar
Frankia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frankia » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:57 pm

Yalos wrote:Statistics don't support rape culture?

Great.

We should still teach our men to be less obsessed with boobs. There's definitely an issue with that.


Interest in breasts/breast size is a sexual fetish which can be possessed by anyone regardless of sex or gender. It has nothing to do with rape and is as much a culture as any other. Is a fetish for hairy armpits a sign of the existence of a rape culture? How about vomit?

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:58 pm

Our Governator wrote:I think women dress the way they dress to please themselves. If they wanted to impress dudes, they wouldn't wear clothes.

yeah, but that's illegal for the most part and not acceptable. Got to have a few strings to cover the naughty bits, after all. Still, you've got a hell of a point.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
T Roosevelt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby T Roosevelt » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:59 pm

Haktiva wrote:
T Roosevelt wrote:I would really like to see dresses take a more casual return, I don't see women usually wearing them unless for special occasions now.

I actually really prefer that myself. I hate to say it, but when women have their goods out on full display, it pretty much saturates the sexual market. plus when men have access to porn for free whenever they want it for the most part, most women can't compete with that. I think they dress like that more for attention(unless maybe it's a gaming or comic convention, because guys kinds dress like that too), in that they feel sexy, but aren't looking for a date or a lay. It probably ends up desensitizing a lot of men too.
If men weren't so desensitized by pornography and these revealing advertisements, the opposite sex wouldn't have to dress so abhorrently. The porn industry should be banned and advertisements should have tighter regulations on the contexts of clothing. Men shouldn't have to please themselves with pornography and women shouldn't have to objectify themselves to a high extent. Frankly, I don't think even men should please themselves without a female partner. It's an unhealthy practice that can be better experienced with your wife completely.
Last edited by T Roosevelt on Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: 4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 9.08

Click here and be a Rough Rider.

[My ideal wife]

[JOIN THE GOP]

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:00 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:I'm sorry, the part about groups not wanting to end sexual assault because of the money involved is to conspiracy-riden for me. Is big rape culture right up there with big business now?

I mean how ridiculous to compare sexual assault to smoking. Clearly if a crime that has been committed since the dawn of time hasn't been eliminated its because of corruption in the awareness groups. Otherwise it would be in decline just like cigarettes right?

Well it pretty much is but the media likes to sensationalize things. There's money in it. You'd have to be a fool to think that people who've made a career complaining about a problem all want that problem to go away.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:00 pm

Our Governator wrote:I think women dress the way they dress to please themselves. If they wanted to impress dudes, they wouldn't wear clothes.

Well by that logic guys must not care about getting women. Otherwise they'd have their manhood triumphantly displayed.
Last edited by The Sotoan Union on Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:01 pm

Yalos wrote:Statistics don't support rape culture?

Great.

We should still teach our men to be less obsessed with boobs. There's definitely an issue with that.


Because that's totally the issue. :roll:

User avatar
T Roosevelt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby T Roosevelt » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:03 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Our Governator wrote:I think women dress the way they dress to please themselves. If they wanted to impress dudes, they wouldn't wear clothes.

Well by that logic guys must not care about getting women. Otherwise they'd have their manhood triumphantly displayed.
There's nothing masculine about being publicly naked; the most triumphant display of manhood is kissing your bride.
Last edited by T Roosevelt on Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: 4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 9.08

Click here and be a Rough Rider.

[My ideal wife]

[JOIN THE GOP]

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:05 pm

Marcurix wrote:
Haktiva wrote:Not according to the CDC
The specific types of sexual violence assessed included rape (completed or attempted forced penetration or alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration) and sexual violence other than rape, including being made to penetrate a perpetrator, sexual coercion (nonphysically pressured unwanted penetration), unwanted sexual contact (e.g., kissing or fondling), and noncontact unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., being flashed or forced to view sexually explicit media).


Great, now give me the actual legal definition of rape.

According to the CDC(in the same article as above)
rape (completed or attempted forced penetration or alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration)


According to the FBI
The new Summary definition of Rape is: “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21036
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Two Jerseys » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:06 pm

Yalos wrote:Statistics don't support rape culture?

Great.

We should still teach our men to be less obsessed with boobs. There's definitely an issue with that.

"And remember Billy, being sexually attracted to the female body IS A SIN, AND YOU'RE GOING TO HELL FOR IT!"

*hits with ruler*

"WHEN YOU GET AN ERECTION, YOU MAKE JESUS CRY!"

*hits with ruler*
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:07 pm

T Roosevelt wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:Well by that logic guys must not care about getting women. Otherwise they'd have their manhood triumphantly displayed.
There's nothing masculine about being publicly naked; the most triumphant display of manhood is kissing your bride.

What kind of display of masculinity requires a woman?

Don't shower, don't wear clothes, and walk erect with your head held up high. One whiff of your manly hormones, and one glance at your testosterone fueled march, and everyone in the room will bow to your superior alpha-male status.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:08 pm

MRA rant in 3... 2... 1...
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Our Governator
Diplomat
 
Posts: 509
Founded: Jun 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Our Governator » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:09 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
T Roosevelt wrote:There's nothing masculine about being publicly naked; the most triumphant display of manhood is kissing your bride.

What kind of display of masculinity requires a woman?

Don't shower, don't wear clothes, and walk erect with your head held up high. One whiff of your manly hormones, and one glance at your testosterone fueled march, and everyone in the room will bow to your superior alpha-male status.

To all you kids out there reading this, he's only kidding. Please shower
"Small L" libertarian, "big R" Republican.
"I'm not a Conservative... as I understand the English language, a conservative wants to conserve, to make things the same, to keep them as they are. Conservatives want bigger government. The true conservatives today, who call themselves "liberals", these New Dealers, want to keep things the same: they want to keep going on the same path, towards bigger and bigger government. I would like to dismantle that. I call myself a Liberal, in the true sense of Liberal, in the sense that means and pertains to freedom."
- Milton Friedman

The Liberal Conservative Party
The Heart of a Liberal,
The Brain of a Conservative

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:10 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Marcurix wrote:
Great, now give me the actual legal definition of rape.

According to the CDC(in the same article as above)
rape (completed or attempted forced penetration or alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration)


According to the FBI
The new Summary definition of Rape is: “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”


First things first, the CDC and the study you linked to is not a legal definition of rape. Its a pretext for that particular study.

Secondly, the FBI definition does not in anyway prove your point that a male can not be raped. Quiet the opposite in fact, as it lacks any gender qualifications and specifics on who exactly is committing the act.

At this point i'm not particularly convinced you have a solid understanding of the issue you're trying to argue.
Last edited by Marcurix on Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:10 pm

T Roosevelt wrote:
Haktiva wrote:I actually really prefer that myself. I hate to say it, but when women have their goods out on full display, it pretty much saturates the sexual market. plus when men have access to porn for free whenever they want it for the most part, most women can't compete with that. I think they dress like that more for attention(unless maybe it's a gaming or comic convention, because guys kinds dress like that too), in that they feel sexy, but aren't looking for a date or a lay. It probably ends up desensitizing a lot of men too.
If men weren't so desensitized by pornography and these revealing advertisements, the opposite sex wouldn't have to dress so abhorrently. The porn industry should be banned and advertisements should have tighter regulations on the contexts of clothing. Men shouldn't have to please themselves with pornography and women shouldn't have to objectify themselves to a high extent. Frankly, I don't think even men should please themselves without a female partner. It's an unhealthy practice that can be better experienced with your wife completely.

That's where I start to disagree. Men and women should be allowed to get their sexual needs fulfilled by whoever they want so long as there is consent. I for one think marriage is bad for men, and dating is also dangerous too due to lots of risks for the man in the form of accidental pregnancies as well as other legate risks, so it's much better for them to use pornography.

And it's a mating strategy between the sexes. Men attract women through displays of wealth, resources, and utility when they aren't getting that much attention, and women become more sexual provocative when they aren't getting as much attention.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Our Governator
Diplomat
 
Posts: 509
Founded: Jun 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Our Governator » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:12 pm

Perhaps one could provide an example of a trial where a woman has been put on trial for raping a man?
"Small L" libertarian, "big R" Republican.
"I'm not a Conservative... as I understand the English language, a conservative wants to conserve, to make things the same, to keep them as they are. Conservatives want bigger government. The true conservatives today, who call themselves "liberals", these New Dealers, want to keep things the same: they want to keep going on the same path, towards bigger and bigger government. I would like to dismantle that. I call myself a Liberal, in the true sense of Liberal, in the sense that means and pertains to freedom."
- Milton Friedman

The Liberal Conservative Party
The Heart of a Liberal,
The Brain of a Conservative

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:12 pm

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Yalos wrote:Statistics don't support rape culture?

Great.

We should still teach our men to be less obsessed with boobs. There's definitely an issue with that.

"And remember Billy, being sexually attracted to the female body IS A SIN, AND YOU'RE GOING TO HELL FOR IT!"

*hits with ruler*

"WHEN YOU GET AN ERECTION, YOU MAKE JESUS CRY!"

*hits with ruler*


"But Father O'Malley says-"

*hits with ruler*

"NONE OF THAT, BOY!"
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:12 pm

Marcurix wrote:
Haktiva wrote:According to the CDC(in the same article as above)
rape (completed or attempted forced penetration or alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration)


According to the FBI
The new Summary definition of Rape is: “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”


First things first, the CDC and the study you linked to is not a legal definition of rape. Its a pretext for that particular study.

Secondly, the FBI definition does not in anyway prove your point that a male can be raped. Quiet the opposite in fact, as it lacks any gender qualifications and specifics on who exactly is committing the act.

At this point i'm not particularly convinced you have a solid understanding of the issue you're trying to argue.

Well men can certainly be raped by other men(look at prison). The stigma is that women can't rape a man. Though of course, looking into that same FBI thing, I did find this;
Rape (except Statutory Rape)
The carnal knowledge of a person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Yalos
Minister
 
Posts: 2536
Founded: Aug 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yalos » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:12 pm

Frankia wrote:
Yalos wrote:Statistics don't support rape culture?

Great.

We should still teach our men to be less obsessed with boobs. There's definitely an issue with that.


Interest in breasts/breast size is a sexual fetish which can be possessed by anyone regardless of sex or gender. It has nothing to do with rape and is as much a culture as any other. Is a fetish for hairy armpits a sign of the existence of a rape culture? How about vomit?

I wasn't necessarily talking about rape culture.

Was I?
Last edited by Yalos on Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:14 pm

Our Governator wrote:Perhaps one could provide an example of a trial where a woman has been put on trial for raping a man?

There's one in Seattle, apparently.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42070
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:15 pm

Haktiva wrote:And it's a mating strategy between the sexes. Men attract women through displays of wealth, resources, and utility when they aren't getting that much attention, and women become more sexual provocative when they aren't getting as much attention.


I'm not rich and I really don't have any realistic chance of becoming so. Nor am I good looking.

Yet I really don't seem to have too much trouble gaining female attention. If you feel that way, perhaps you're just repulsive?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:16 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Our Governator wrote:Perhaps one could provide an example of a trial where a woman has been put on trial for raping a man?

There's one in Seattle, apparently.


The Usual Suspects will of course insist she will be acquitted and the man mocked for complaining about it, yada yada yada.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
T Roosevelt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby T Roosevelt » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:19 pm

Haktiva wrote:
T Roosevelt wrote:If men weren't so desensitized by pornography and these revealing advertisements, the opposite sex wouldn't have to dress so abhorrently. The porn industry should be banned and advertisements should have tighter regulations on the contexts of clothing. Men shouldn't have to please themselves with pornography and women shouldn't have to objectify themselves to a high extent. Frankly, I don't think even men should please themselves without a female partner. It's an unhealthy practice that can be better experienced with your wife completely.

That's where I start to disagree. Men and women should be allowed to get their sexual needs fulfilled by whoever they want so long as there is consent. I for one think marriage is bad for men, and dating is also dangerous too due to lots of risks for the man in the form of accidental pregnancies as well as other legate risks, so it's much better for them to use pornography.

And it's a mating strategy between the sexes. Men attract women through displays of wealth, resources, and utility when they aren't getting that much attention, and women become more sexual provocative when they aren't getting as much attention.

Ignoring a woman will not make her want to be intimate with you unless you're very valuable to her (She finds you attractive). Women do not find passive men attractive, that is why it's expected that men approach. You mentioned utility, what is male utility?
Economic Left/Right: 4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 9.08

Click here and be a Rough Rider.

[My ideal wife]

[JOIN THE GOP]

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Aggicificicerous, Cinnaa, Comfed, Eahland, Floofybit, Gutachter, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kostane, Mardesurria, Mr TM, Platypus Bureaucracy, Statesburg, Stratonesia, The Holy Therns

Advertisement

Remove ads