Hahklallah wrote:The High Lizzleness wrote:Jugs of Unicorns wrote:Hahklallah wrote:Last I heard, god didn't write the bible, its was the priests who thought that was what god said, some of those priests could have lied, its very easy, like saying I'm an atheist when most know I'm a christian
Oh how convenient. Christians say that God doesn't condone killing, yet when the Bible shows God condoning killing, it was "just the writers" that said that, not God. Do Christians even know what they believe?
Pretty much. If the Bible is the only "proof" they have, and they say it is flawed, then it is completely illogical to say "God is true because the Bible says." They contradict themselves.
I believe that some of the old testament is total fuckin' bullshit, but the new testament is the most believable. Historians have matched up most of the events with events described by the Egyptians and other Middle Eastern Nations, including the crucifixion of Jesus. You can't deny that the new testament is based on pure fact if its actually matched up in history.When Paul went to Rome, that was recorded. Did you know Scientists actually reconstructed Jesus' face with the shroud he was buried in, also Scientist are looking for the Ark of the Covenant, to find the stone the ten commandments are inscribed on yet most of them don't believe in any religion. Tell me why they want it if they don't believe in it.
The important part- the miracles- have not been proven, to my knowledge. So they proved some guy named Jesus wandered around and preached- great. Now you have to prove he was the son of god. Otherwise, the Bible isn't trufax,
To the last part of your post: They want the truth. Scientists shouldn't let their biases in the way of their jobs. Truth is what is most important. Not that the Ten Commandments would prove that god was real. Moses could have always forged them on the rocks to make his followers easier to control. It happens. Of course, if they showed that they were formed in some advanced way, that would be different.