Advertisement
by The Matthew Islands » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:03 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
by Saiwania » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:09 am
Britannic Realms wrote:So you're going to blame the modern unionists for something that happened hundreds of years ago?
by Britannic Realms » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:11 am
by Mad Jack » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:14 am
EUstan wrote:Yeah, only creepy British nationalits.
by Aboras » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:18 am
by Britannic Realms » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:20 am
Britannic Realms wrote:Apparently, 52% of Catholics support the Union. So you're assumption is wrong.
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/ ... 28265.html
by Mad Jack » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:27 am
by Aboras » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:31 am
by Nadkor » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:45 am
Risottia wrote:Is there any "Left-wing Party Against Idiotic Ethno-Religious Divides"?
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:52 am
United Regions of Verona wrote:Well I'm from the Republic not Northern. No offense, but I still kinda think Ulster was a traitor (Back then, not now since most people on NS weren't alive in the day of the Irish a Civil War in 1922. Not even me). You never wanted to be taken over by the Normans, yet here you are wanting to stay with the UK.
by United Marxist Nations » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:57 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:United Regions of Verona wrote:Well I'm from the Republic not Northern. No offense, but I still kinda think Ulster was a traitor (Back then, not now since most people on NS weren't alive in the day of the Irish a Civil War in 1922. Not even me). You never wanted to be taken over by the Normans, yet here you are wanting to stay with the UK.
So let me get this straight.
the county that doesn't openly revolt against the democratically elected government in order to found a state on racist and sectarian values are the traitors.
That's a novel way of thinking.
The problem is that the current situation in northern ireland and the republican ireland is that it's evolved past the point of traitors and such.
Now it's just a clusterfuck.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Mad Jack » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:58 am
United Regions of Verona wrote:Well I'm from the Republic not Northern. No offense, but I still kinda think Ulster was a traitor (Back then, not now since most people on NS weren't alive in the day of the Irish a Civil War in 1922. Not even me). You never wanted to be taken over by the Normans, yet here you are wanting to stay with the UK.
by Nadkor » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:59 am
Saiwania wrote:Alf Landon wrote:Lot happened between the Normans and the War of Independence. For one thing, the mass of Protestants that immigrated over from Great Britain. It's their descendants that made up the unionist community, and as far as they were concerned it was Sinn Fein who were the traitors.
That is why I'm for a united Ireland. The unionists are just British people who've stolen land belonging to Ireland and have succeeded in keeping their ill gotten gains. Soon it is going to be impossible to ever restore northern Ireland to its rightful owners.
by Britannic Realms » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:01 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
So let me get this straight.
the county that doesn't openly revolt against the democratically elected government in order to found a state on racist and sectarian values are the traitors.
That's a novel way of thinking.
The problem is that the current situation in northern ireland and the republican ireland is that it's evolved past the point of traitors and such.
Now it's just a clusterfuck.
How are they racist? The British were the ones who were colonizing Africa and using gas on the Arabs, not to mention that many Irish Republicans expressed support for the victims of British imperialism.
EDIT: Also, to call the British government in Ireland in 1922 "democratically elected" is pretty fallacious.
by Nadkor » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:03 pm
by United Marxist Nations » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:05 pm
Britannic Realms wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:How are they racist? The British were the ones who were colonizing Africa and using gas on the Arabs, not to mention that many Irish Republicans expressed support for the victims of British imperialism.
EDIT: Also, to call the British government in Ireland in 1922 "democratically elected" is pretty fallacious.
One country being racist does not make the other not racist, just less racist.
Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Ki ... tion,_1918
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Britannic Realms » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:16 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Britannic Realms wrote:
One country being racist does not make the other not racist, just less racist.
Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Ki ... tion,_1918
But how is their state founded on racist values, as the poster I quoted said so?
Also, that shows that the majority of Irish voted for the party that wanted secession, and they then did so. The British tried to stop that.
by EUstan » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:33 pm
Mad Jack wrote:EUstan wrote:All catholics are for seceding from UK, it is just that protestant colonist have majority in population.
A majority of Catholics do not want to reunify with the ROI
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:35 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Britannic Realms wrote:
One country being racist does not make the other not racist, just less racist.
Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Ki ... tion,_1918
But how is their state founded on racist values, as the poster I quoted said so?
Also, that shows that the majority of Irish voted for the party that wanted secession, and they then did so. The British tried to stop that.
by EUstan » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:37 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:But how is their state founded on racist values, as the poster I quoted said so?
Also, that shows that the majority of Irish voted for the party that wanted secession, and they then did so. The British tried to stop that.
Just look into the actions of the rebels.
by Kouralia » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:37 pm
EUstan wrote:
The vast majority of autohtonic inhabitans of Belfast voted for Sinn Fein i.e. for a united Ireland. Polls from british web sites are biased just like the british government when it comes to Northern Ireland.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:38 pm
Britannic Realms wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:But how is their state founded on racist values, as the poster I quoted said so?
Also, that shows that the majority of Irish voted for the party that wanted secession, and they then did so. The British tried to stop that.
It wasn't, I was just objecting to how you used Britain's racism as a reason for Ireland not being racist.
Maybe if they hadn't unilaterally declared independence and then immediately attacked British police and soldiers, the government may have been more open to the prospect.
by EUstan » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:39 pm
Kouralia wrote:EUstan wrote:The vast majority of autohtonic inhabitans of Belfast voted for Sinn Fein i.e. for a united Ireland. Polls from british web sites are biased just like the british government when it comes to Northern Ireland.
So, it's biased if it supports the opposing viewpoint, and unbiased if it supports your own, right?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Angevin-Romanov Crimea, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Azurnailia, Emoti, Fartsniffage, Fort Viorlia, Free Fools, Geniyana, Google [Bot], Haku, Immoren, Ioudaia, Keltionialang, Kostane, Libertarian Negev, Moltian, Mr TM, Nu Elysium, Nutskir, Ostroeuropa, Port Carverton, Riviere Renard, Shrillland, Skalliad, Soviet Haaregrad, Tarsonis, The Eur-asian Federation, Umbratellus, Valrifall, Zimmi, Zurkerx
Advertisement