What is your view on homosexual rights and why?

[Marcheria]

Actually your wrong, marriage originally was a pagan ritual of which the father exchanged his daughter to another man for money or property. Women werrent looked at as people but more as property and so christanity and other religons took that and made it a ceremony involving god. Yet its funny that most divorces come from religous people who marry under god.

Now I have this going through my mind:

"Don't like her?! What's wrong with her? She's beautiful, she's rich, she's got huge... tracts of land."

I love that one. My first Broadway show.

[Ceannairceach]

Yes yes. I don't believe fundamentalists should get married either. We need less fundamentalists, not more.

funny 1 I AM NOT A F-ing BAPTIST. 2 NOR AM I FUNDALMENTILIST,3 i have nothing against gays, i have many gay and bisexual friends. 4 going to hell if your gay is a tennet of my religion, not my belief so forgive for being religious. 4 go eastern orthodox

Show me where it says "All gays go to hell", if you would.

[Geniasis]

I think they are talking about taxes.

I was unaware that gay people didn't pay taxes.

Holy shit. Do you think they're accepting applications?

[SpectacularSpectacular]

I was unaware that gay people didn't pay taxes.

Holy shit. Do you think they're accepting applications?

It's more of a 'hazing' entry process.

[Geniasis]

Well, remember, nuns would beat kids for being left-handed.

Hence why every time I encounter a nun, I wake up in a jail cell with 13 broken rulers and an assault charge.

[Hathradic States]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

[Meryuma]

i have no problems with gays, but be gay ur going to hell

"I have no problem with gays, but they should be tortured in a lake of fire for all eternity".

[Hathradic States]

i have no problems with gays, but be gay ur going to hell

"I have no problem with gays, but they should be tortured in a lake of fire for all eternity".

I like that idea. Can I roast them and serve them on pizza, too?

[Norstal]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

Hahah

Haha

No.

[Marcheria]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

Hahah

Haha

No.

Funny idea though. The "Fabulous" Revolution...

[Hathradic States]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

Hahah

Haha

No.

Explain to me how anybody can have inherent rights in a secular state in any other way then by fighting for them? Where can the base their worth and their rights from without divine statement?

[Conserative Morality]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

Right. And Liberals should use physical violence against Fascists, because if Fascists were worthy of rights, they'd win.

[Conserative Morality]

Explain to me how anybody can have inherent rights in a secular state in any other way then by fighting for them? Where can the base their worth and their rights from without divine statement?

Through the law. The law grants us certain rights considered legally to be inherent to our position as citizens of the country.

[Hathradic States]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

Right. And Liberals should use physical violence against Fascists, because if Fascists were worthy of rights, they'd win.

Yes. And Conservatives should use force against liberials. We'd win, too, since we believe in our guns.

[Ceannairceach]

I believe that if they want rights, they should fight for them. Not fight by using politicians and lawyers to force them to have rights, but fight like the American's did against the British. If they are truly worthy of rights, then they should be able to use force to convince us of that.

It just so happens that under the current powers that be, which did fight for rights, all people should be equal under said power. So fighting for them is kind of moot.

[Conserative Morality]

Yes. And Conservatives should use force against liberials. We'd win, too, since we believe in our guns.

Because that's what wins wars. Civilians with guns.

[Norstal]

Right. And Liberals should use physical violence against Fascists, because if Fascists were worthy of rights, they'd win.

Yes. And Conservatives should use force against liberials. We'd win, too, since we believe in our guns.

Wow really? Are you saying conservatives are pussies?

Your enemy are the terrorists. Not civilians, pussies and cowards.

[Hathradic States]

Explain to me how anybody can have inherent rights in a secular state in any other way then by fighting for them? Where can the base their worth and their rights from without divine statement?

Through the law. The law grants us certain rights considered legally to be inherent to our position as citizens of the country.

And, furthermore, what would provide the basis for those laws to be expanded? If the majority would simply not allow the minority to gain a foothold of power, then there would never be a threat to the power of the majority.

Yes. And Conservatives should use force against liberials. We'd win, too, since we believe in our guns.

Because that's what wins wars. Civilians with guns.

It helps. Just ask the Russians.

[Norstal]

It helps. Just ask the Russians.

You want corrupt politicians? What?

[Marcheria]

Yes. And Conservatives should use force against liberials. We'd win, too, since we believe in our guns.

Wow really? Are you saying conservatives are pussies?

Your enemy are the terrorists. Not civilians, pussies and cowards.

The enemy is not the political parties, the church or the terrorists! It is ourselves! Our inherent stupidity and gullibility has put us in our current situation. Renounce greed and accept your fellow Homo sapiens and THEN we may have a little order in this world!

[Conserative Morality]

And, furthermore, what would provide the basis for those laws to be expanded? If the majority would simply not allow the minority to gain a foothold of power, then there would never be a threat to the power of the majority.

Indeed. And there isn't. Of course, the fact remains that the majority and the minority are not always at odds.

It helps. Just ask the Russians.

The Russians? You mean the same country that used large, well-coordinated attacks by trained soldiers to overwhelm the enemy?

lolwut?

[Hathradic States]

Wow really? Are you saying conservatives are pussies?

Your enemy are the terrorists. Not civilians, pussies and cowards.

The enemy is not the political parties, the church or the terrorists! It is ourselves! Our inherent stupidity and gullibility has put us in our current situation. Renounce greed and accept your fellow Homo sapiens and THEN we may have a little order in this world!

Order is boring. If I cannot have a totalitarian state led by me, then let anarchy reign.

[Conserative Morality]

The enemy is not the political parties, the church or the terrorists! It is ourselves! Our inherent stupidity and gullibility has put us in our current situation. Renounce greed and accept your fellow Homo sapiens and THEN we may have a little order in this world!

Foolishness. War is a tool, politics, as Von Clausewitz said, by any other means. Our enemies are those that oppose our views, and as such should be opposed in any way that one's ideology allows.

[Tekania]

Right. And Liberals should use physical violence against Fascists, because if Fascists were worthy of rights, they'd win.

Yes. And Conservatives should use force against liberials. We'd win, too, since we believe in our guns.

Except y'all can't shoot worth shit and you keep cutting our VA benefits.

[Norstal]

The enemy is not the political parties, the church or the terrorists! It is ourselves! Our inherent stupidity and gullibility has put us in our current situation. Renounce greed and accept your fellow Homo sapiens and THEN we may have a little order in this world!

Order is boring. If I cannot have a totalitarian state led by me, then let anarchy reign.

The best part is that you're Christian!