NATION

PASSWORD

Should a women-only hour at the gym be the standard policy?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
WaRtArIa
Minister
 
Posts: 2138
Founded: Oct 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby WaRtArIa » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:30 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:If there's anything I'm sure of it is that you can't psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feelings.


Sure, but being uncomfortable due men staring at you it's a quite common thing. So it's not about "psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feeling", it's about having some experience and knowing a lot of women with similar experiences.

Usually, women AND men alike feel nervous at the gym because it's their first few times there, and because they feel ridiculously out-of-shape compared to the rest of the people.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:31 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:If there's anything I'm sure of it is that you can't psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feelings.


Sure, but being uncomfortable due men staring at you it's a quite common thing. So it's not about "psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feeling", it's about having some experience and knowing a lot of women with similar experiences.


And women staring at other women?
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Futrellia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1697
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Futrellia » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:31 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:If there's anything I'm sure of it is that you can't psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feelings.


Sure, but being uncomfortable due men staring at you it's a quite common thing. So it's not about "psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feeling", it's about having some experience and knowing a lot of women with similar experiences.


When your at a gym, people stare. When your out at Walmart, people stare. When out in public in general, people stare. It's just a natural human thing. Women stare at men, men stare at women, women stare at women, men stare at men. There is no "men are staring at me therefore i deserve an hour where there is no men to stare at me."

Then women will stare at you. It's apart of life. I don't understand why it's such a big deal.
Last edited by Futrellia on Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73184
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:32 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:If there's anything I'm sure of it is that you can't psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feelings.


Sure, but being uncomfortable due men staring at you it's a quite common thing.


I doubt it, at least in the context of gyms. Most people in gyms are pretty disgusting, sweaty, wearing weird clothes, etc.

Myself included.

So it's not about "psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feeling", it's about having some experience and knowing a lot of women with similar experiences.

I seriously doubt the logical feeling is "what if my gym can be discriminatory".
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:39 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:If there's anything I'm sure of it is that you can't psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feelings.


Sure, but being uncomfortable due men staring at you it's a quite common thing. So it's not about "psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feeling", it's about having some experience and knowing a lot of women with similar experiences.


I am assuming that when you mean "stare" you mean people staring at someone like they'd rape them right there and then.

That has nothing to do with the male gym patrons being oppressive though.

That has to do with certain gym patrons being idiots. But then, if your end goal is to get rid of idiots, I am sorry to say but being an idiot is a genderless epidemic.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Chessmistress » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:40 pm

Galloism wrote:



I seriously doubt the logical feeling is "what if my gym can be discriminatory".


Then how do you explain the relative abundance (even if it's not enough) of women-only events at various universities? Do you really think they they're trying to be discriminatory? Or it's just that they need a place free from the male gaze?

Wartaria wrote:Usually, women AND men alike feel nervous at the gym because it's their first few times there, and because they feel ridiculously out-of-shape compared to the rest of the people.


The problem of men staring at you doesn't happen just only during the first few times...
Last edited by Chessmistress on Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
WaRtArIa
Minister
 
Posts: 2138
Founded: Oct 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby WaRtArIa » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:41 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:



I seriously doubt the logical feeling is "what if my gym can be discriminatory".


Then how do you explain the relative abundance (even if it's not enough) of women-only events at various universities? Do you really think they they're trying to be discriminatory? Or it's just that they need a place free from the male gaze?

Wartaria wrote:Usually, women AND men alike feel nervous at the gym because it's their first few times there, and because they feel ridiculously out-of-shape compared to the rest of the people.


The problem of men staring at you doesn't happen just only during the first few times...

Usually, everyone stares at us, usually because we're sweaty and ugly messes.

User avatar
Futrellia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1697
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Futrellia » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:41 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:



Then how do you explain the relative abundance (even if it's not enough) of women-only events at various universities? Do you really think they they're trying to be discriminatory? Or it's just that they need a place free from the male gaze?



The problem of men staring at you doesn't happen just only during the first few times...


Again, your defending and trying to morph an experience to only show fault with men, so i will post this again.

When your at a gym, people stare. When your out at Walmart, people stare. When out in public in general, people stare. It's just a natural human thing. Women stare at men, men stare at women, women stare at women, men stare at men. There is no "men are staring at me therefore i deserve an hour where there is no men to stare at me."

Then women will stare at you. It's apart of life. I don't understand why it's such a big deal.
Last edited by Futrellia on Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ormata
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Jun 30, 2016
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ormata » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:41 pm

Chessmistress wrote:The problem of men staring at you doesn't happen just only during the first few times...


Have you noted my prior statement?

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17240
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:43 pm

Camaalbakrius wrote:
Kubra wrote: merely a setup to jumpstart the conversation. Rather, isn't it you who has been using the pretext of forgiveness and insult to avoid having to actually address the subject at hand? Why, any one of the listed responses would have shut me up faster than a roundhouse to the face.
The offer is still on the table, of course.

You know what? Fine. I'll play your game. I think Milo is completely right. You're like putty in his hands, and he has manipulated you into exactly what he describes. I think Milo is awesome, and he is hilarious.

For the record, I'm the one who's been looking for worthwhile conversation here, but Chessmistress is hardly even worth trying to debate with.

I don't care about silencing you. Why should I?

Another thing, you are terrible at starting conversations. No offense, but seriously, you don't start worthwhile conversation by telling someone that you think their opinion is worthless and not worth listening to
Ah, then it follows: Why is it that Milo's position, ultimately a more exclusionary one, is alright, but a womens only hour is not? I mean, the latter is geared towards general fitness, whilst the former most certainly isn't.

Well, I don't think you've been keen on talking about the matter at all, to be honest.
Terrible? I'm hurt, really. I went into this conversation thinking to myself "What would Milo do?" and it seemed that the only conclusion was to begin provocatively, but it appears that I've misjudged. Where have I failed? But I forgive you, of course.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112600
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:45 pm

Ormata wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:The problem of men staring at you doesn't happen just only during the first few times...


Have you noted my prior statement?

Just a tip, if the post you want someone to read isn't on the same page as the reminder, a link is very helpful.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:45 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:I wrote these earlier today, so if they sound a bit angry, just know that there is more context that I am just not showing. I was also angrier earlier today, so don't mind that


1.
Are you really requesting me a non-feminist source stating that women are oppressed by the patriarchy?
I'll try to search for it if you are able to give me a communist source saying that capitalism is a great system.

2.
Spain?
Why Spain should be particularly different from France or USA?
I actually lived in Spain, in Barcelona, for a while, and also I lived in other two European countries.
I didn't notice enormous differences.
Spain have a lot of bad attitudes towards women, but most such attitudes are shared by many other western countries, and Spain have one of the most advanced laws against domestic violence against women, with dedicated courts against domestic violence against women.

1. Ah, you missed my point. I want you to point out a time in history where society has changed to meet the needs of men, as you claimed. I want EVIDENCE. I'm not looking for opinions. I'm looking for EVIDENCE. Historical evidence. I'm not asking for non-feminist proof that women are oppressed by a patriarchy, I'm asking if you can find evidence in history where Society has changed to meet the needs of men. That is what I am asking. I'm not looking for bias. I'm looking for EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE

2. I heard that in Spain, unlike the USA, women are actually opressed in some ways. You completely dodged the point I made about the middle east and how women are treated there.
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17240
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:47 pm

Wartaria wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Sure, but being uncomfortable due men staring at you it's a quite common thing. So it's not about "psychically sense hundreds of thousands of peoples unspoken feeling", it's about having some experience and knowing a lot of women with similar experiences.

Usually, women AND men alike feel nervous at the gym because it's their first few times there, and because they feel ridiculously out-of-shape compared to the rest of the people.
Depends on context. Most folks who are nervous about the whole gym thing will stick to cardiovascular machines, which is fine, whatever gets you there. The problem is the weights, where one feels a certain amount of visibility, mostly because how much weight you've put on the bar is open for anyone waiting for the rack to see. That's hella uncomfortable when you're not at the bigger numbers. It must be admitted that men have a greater capacity for muscle growth and muscle recruitment for the activity of weightlifting, so guys are usually gonna hit average numbers at a much quicker rate. I can at least imagine that being a women and having to slowly crawl up the weights while mr 5%er tank grunts his reps.

Though again, the problem is gone by just having a cool atmosphere and properly educating newbies.
Last edited by Kubra on Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Ormata
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Jun 30, 2016
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ormata » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:50 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Ormata wrote:
Have you noted my prior statement?

Just a tip, if the post you want someone to read isn't on the same page as the reminder, a link is very helpful.


Apologies, it was more of a challenge. I have repeatedly replied to points stated by Chess, who has repeatedly decided to ignore such points. Such blatant disrespect is annoying to state the least.

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:50 pm

Kubra wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:You know what? Fine. I'll play your game. I think Milo is completely right. You're like putty in his hands, and he has manipulated you into exactly what he describes. I think Milo is awesome, and he is hilarious.

For the record, I'm the one who's been looking for worthwhile conversation here, but Chessmistress is hardly even worth trying to debate with.

I don't care about silencing you. Why should I?

Another thing, you are terrible at starting conversations. No offense, but seriously, you don't start worthwhile conversation by telling someone that you think their opinion is worthless and not worth listening to
Ah, then it follows: Why is it that Milo's position, ultimately a more exclusionary one, is alright, but a womens only hour is not? I mean, the latter is geared towards general fitness, whilst the former most certainly isn't.

Well, I don't think you've been keen on talking about the matter at all, to be honest.
Terrible? I'm hurt, really. I went into this conversation thinking to myself "What would Milo do?" and it seemed that the only conclusion was to begin provocatively, but it appears that I've misjudged. Where have I failed? But I forgive you, of course.

Oh, the flamebait. Should I take it though? Hmm... tough choices. I think I'll pass, but I forgive you for trying to do evil upon me. Have a nice day, hopefully you can have productive conversation in the future
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17240
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:53 pm

Camaalbakrius wrote:
Kubra wrote: Ah, then it follows: Why is it that Milo's position, ultimately a more exclusionary one, is alright, but a womens only hour is not? I mean, the latter is geared towards general fitness, whilst the former most certainly isn't.

Well, I don't think you've been keen on talking about the matter at all, to be honest.
Terrible? I'm hurt, really. I went into this conversation thinking to myself "What would Milo do?" and it seemed that the only conclusion was to begin provocatively, but it appears that I've misjudged. Where have I failed? But I forgive you, of course.

Oh, the flamebait. Should I take it though? Hmm... tough choices. I think I'll pass, but I forgive you for trying to do evil upon me. Have a nice day, hopefully you can have productive conversation in the future
Flamebait? It seemed a rather straightforward question that could easily be answered in a straightforward matter. In what way have I misunderstood?
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:53 pm

Kubra wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:You know what? Fine. I'll play your game. I think Milo is completely right. You're like putty in his hands, and he has manipulated you into exactly what he describes. I think Milo is awesome, and he is hilarious.

For the record, I'm the one who's been looking for worthwhile conversation here, but Chessmistress is hardly even worth trying to debate with.

I don't care about silencing you. Why should I?

Another thing, you are terrible at starting conversations. No offense, but seriously, you don't start worthwhile conversation by telling someone that you think their opinion is worthless and not worth listening to
Ah, then it follows: Why is it that Milo's position, ultimately a more exclusionary one, is alright, but a womens only hour is not? I mean, the latter is geared towards general fitness, whilst the former most certainly isn't.

Well, I don't think you've been keen on talking about the matter at all, to be honest.
Terrible? I'm hurt, really. I went into this conversation thinking to myself "What would Milo do?" and it seemed that the only conclusion was to begin provocatively, but it appears that I've misjudged. Where have I failed? But I forgive you, of course.

A bit hypocritical, don't you think? Using the tactics of someone you don't like to do something that you despise about that person?

You only prove that Milo is right. You're doing exactly what Milo does: being a troll
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:54 pm

Kubra wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:Oh, the flamebait. Should I take it though? Hmm... tough choices. I think I'll pass, but I forgive you for trying to do evil upon me. Have a nice day, hopefully you can have productive conversation in the future
Flamebait? It seemed a rather straightforward question that could easily be answered in a straightforward matter. In what way have I misunderstood?

For one, you condescension lacks subtlety altogether
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Futrellia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1697
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Futrellia » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:54 pm

Kubra wrote:
Wartaria wrote:Usually, women AND men alike feel nervous at the gym because it's their first few times there, and because they feel ridiculously out-of-shape compared to the rest of the people.
Depends on context. Most folks who are nervous about the whole gym thing will stick to cardiovascular machines, which is fine, whatever gets you there. The problem is the weights, where one feels a certain amount of visibility, mostly because how much weight you've put on the bar is open for anyone waiting for the rack to see. That's hella uncomfortable when you're not at the bigger numbers. It must be admitted that men have a greater capacity for muscle growth and muscle recruitment for the activity of weightlifting, so guys are usually gonna hit average numbers at a much quicker rate. I can at least imagine that being a women and having to slowly crawl up the weights while mr 5%er tank grunts his reps.

Though again, the problem is gone by just having a cool atmosphere and properly educating newbies.


I've been going to the gym for two+ years now. I've seen guys come in that bench 270lbs and i've also seen guys that can only bench 90lbs. I used to be one of them. This all stems from your own self-consciousness. When bigger guys watch you lift lower weights, you feel embarrassed, it's only natural. But if you really care about the improvement of your body, you won't give a shit. In the gym, you're supposed to be uncomfortable, your supposed to feel all eyes on you, but if your really committed to becoming a new you, it won't matter. If you stick with it, people can watch you all day as you progress and become a more fit, muscled and toned person.

If you can't handle that, then there's plenty of apps that help you plan diets and workouts from the comfort and safety of your own home, where nobody judges you.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17240
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:57 pm

Camaalbakrius wrote:
Kubra wrote: Ah, then it follows: Why is it that Milo's position, ultimately a more exclusionary one, is alright, but a womens only hour is not? I mean, the latter is geared towards general fitness, whilst the former most certainly isn't.

Well, I don't think you've been keen on talking about the matter at all, to be honest.
Terrible? I'm hurt, really. I went into this conversation thinking to myself "What would Milo do?" and it seemed that the only conclusion was to begin provocatively, but it appears that I've misjudged. Where have I failed? But I forgive you, of course.

A bit hypocritical, don't you think? Using the tactics of someone you don't like to do something that you despise about that person?

You only prove that Milo is right. You're doing exactly what Milo does: being a troll
Trolling? Is that what it is? What Milo does? I had assumed that his methods were to ellicit a response where one would otherwise not be received. After all, he most certainly does have that effect, does it not? It has been through such methods that I have been able to confirm that you want the overweight excluded from gyms.
So, if you want to talk hypocrisy, let's talk this position in relation to the position you've taken regarding women-only hours. Is there not some degree of contradiction between these two views you hold?
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:59 pm

Kubra wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:Oh, the flamebait. Should I take it though? Hmm... tough choices. I think I'll pass, but I forgive you for trying to do evil upon me. Have a nice day, hopefully you can have productive conversation in the future
Flamebait? It seemed a rather straightforward question that could easily be answered in a straightforward matter. In what way have I misunderstood?

The reason that it is alright for Milo to have those points of view is because they are opinions. It is not ok in my opinion to have women's only hours because it is sexist in action
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Aboveland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1667
Founded: Dec 04, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Aboveland » Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:02 pm

The idea of a women's only hour is akin to having a white only hour. Would people think that is racist? Yes, of course, because black people would be barred from going to the gym for an hour, giving white people exclusive rights. This shitty idea is therefore sexist, because it privileges one sex only. I've always thought that if the minority demands too much equality the oppressors become the oppressed.
AUTONOMOUS TERRITORIES OF THE ABOVIAN UNION: Nykipiflugpuu

Home to Terho Talvela, three-time WGPC World Champion, and one-time WSRC World Champion

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:03 pm

Kubra wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:A bit hypocritical, don't you think? Using the tactics of someone you don't like to do something that you despise about that person?

You only prove that Milo is right. You're doing exactly what Milo does: being a troll
Trolling? Is that what it is? What Milo does? I had assumed that his methods were to ellicit a response where one would otherwise not be received. After all, he most certainly does have that effect, does it not? It has been through such methods that I have been able to confirm that you want the overweight excluded from gyms.
So, if you want to talk hypocrisy, let's talk this position in relation to the position you've taken regarding women-only hours. Is there not some degree of contradiction between these two views you hold?

First of all, he calls himself a Troll. Second of all, I don't want overweight people excluded from gyms. He never meant that. Why do you think I said you were putty in his hands? He was trolling you. He says those things because he knows feminists hate that, and he wants to illicit responses from you, not because he actually believes it. That's trolling. And he seems to have done a pretty good job. He's a professional provocateur, and it is ok in real life, but in NS we have rules. Many people would call what Milo does falmebaiting.
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17240
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:04 pm

Futrellia wrote:
Kubra wrote: Depends on context. Most folks who are nervous about the whole gym thing will stick to cardiovascular machines, which is fine, whatever gets you there. The problem is the weights, where one feels a certain amount of visibility, mostly because how much weight you've put on the bar is open for anyone waiting for the rack to see. That's hella uncomfortable when you're not at the bigger numbers. It must be admitted that men have a greater capacity for muscle growth and muscle recruitment for the activity of weightlifting, so guys are usually gonna hit average numbers at a much quicker rate. I can at least imagine that being a women and having to slowly crawl up the weights while mr 5%er tank grunts his reps.

Though again, the problem is gone by just having a cool atmosphere and properly educating newbies.


I've been going to the gym for two+ years now. I've seen guys come in that bench 270lbs and i've also seen guys that can only bench 90lbs. I used to be one of them. This all stems from your own self-consciousness. When bigger guys watch you lift lower weights, you feel embarrassed, it's only natural. But if you really care about the improvement of your body, you won't give a shit. In the gym, you're supposed to be uncomfortable, your supposed to feel all eyes on you, but if your really committed to becoming a new you, it won't matter. If you stick with it, people can watch you all day as you progress and become a more fit, muscled and toned person.

If you can't handle that, then there's plenty of apps that help you plan diets and workouts from the comfort and safety of your own home, where nobody judges you.
Sure, but telling yourself "no ones looking" only works so well. I credit all gains made not to myself, but the chill uni staff who were willing to form check me without charging me.
You're supposed to be uncomfortable, yeah, but not socially, man. Discomfort should ideally stem from physical exertion.

Saying "but if you're really committed" as about the equivalent of tell the homeless to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, or American Military Advisors telling their afghani subordinates "You have to want it more than we do". It's pure rhetoric in the context of policy.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Duradeiro
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Jul 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Duradeiro » Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:09 pm

A public university shouldn't be excluding specific genders from gyms - or any other rec center for that matter. Students are paying to use these facilities, so how is it fair to exclude them because somebody might feel 'intimidated' by their presence? If somebody is so bothered by this issue, they should find a private gym that either follows this policy or is completely female-only.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Emotional Support Crocodile, Oceasia, Philjia, Port Carverton, The Huskar Social Union, United Calanworie, Vanuzgard, Yasuragi, Zancostan

Advertisement

Remove ads