Advertisement
by Costa Fierro » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:37 am
by United Marxist Nations » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:42 am
Saiwania wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:It hadn't been in a state of civil war; South Ossetia had been independent since winning its war of independence in 1992.
Why hasn't South Ossetia been on any official map then? The majority of the world has kept recognizing it as apart of Georgia. If South Ossetia is strong enough to maintain independence on its own, then the world would recognize it, as it has with East Timor against Indonesia.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Respawn » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:50 am
Shofercia wrote:Radio Liberty/Radio Free Europe. Official press releases originating from the governments of UK, Poland & Baltics; they might as well call themselves the "Coalition of pro-US bitches in the EU" - it'd at least be honest. The "current government" of Ukraine in Kiev. Pretty much anyone who called French - wimps - for negotiating peace between Russia & Georgia around August 16th.
by Saiwania » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:51 am
Costa Fierro wrote:East Timor is not considered contested territory, whereas South Ossetia is.
by United Marxist Nations » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:53 am
Saiwania wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:East Timor is not considered contested territory, whereas South Ossetia is.
What land will even be left for Georgia if its provinces are allowed to break off left and right and Georgia can't do anything about it so long as Russia chooses to actively undermine Tbilisi? It is a tiny nation and can only lose so much.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Costa Fierro » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:53 am
Saiwania wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:East Timor is not considered contested territory, whereas South Ossetia is.
What land will even be left for Georgia if its provinces are allowed to break off left and right and Georgia can't do anything about it so long as Russia chooses to actively undermine Tbilisi? It is a tiny nation and can only lose so much.
by Jinwoy » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:02 am
Respawn wrote:Shofercia wrote:Radio Liberty/Radio Free Europe. Official press releases originating from the governments of UK, Poland & Baltics; they might as well call themselves the "Coalition of pro-US bitches in the EU" - it'd at least be honest. The "current government" of Ukraine in Kiev. Pretty much anyone who called French - wimps - for negotiating peace between Russia & Georgia around August 16th.
Oh dear. Now you're just taking the piss.
Like I already said, the UK has its own reasons to be displeased at Russia, especially after the assassination of Litvinenko and the constant violations of British airspace by Russian aircraft (with the most recent one occurring only yesterday, funnily enough). As for Poland and the Baltics, well you shouldn't have to guess why they are so distrustful of Russia. Clue: it has very little to do with US foreign policy.
And there are plenty of differences, might I add. For example, the US wants to arm Ukraine, but the UK is saying Ukraine is not ready for it.
The fact that you cannot seem to accept that Western nations are able to form their formulate their own foreign policy without American influence epitomises why most of the developed world sees Russia as a threat. It's incredibly condescending , but it's the expected response from the Putinist cheer squad.
But hey, I guess we are all too stupid to make up our own minds when it comes to Russia so we just do the US' bidding because it's convenient.
by Costa Fierro » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:06 am
Jinwoy wrote:Respawn wrote:Oh dear. Now you're just taking the piss.
Like I already said, the UK has its own reasons to be displeased at Russia, especially after the assassination of Litvinenko and the constant violations of British airspace by Russian aircraft (with the most recent one occurring only yesterday, funnily enough). As for Poland and the Baltics, well you shouldn't have to guess why they are so distrustful of Russia. Clue: it has very little to do with US foreign policy.
And there are plenty of differences, might I add. For example, the US wants to arm Ukraine, but the UK is saying Ukraine is not ready for it.
The fact that you cannot seem to accept that Western nations are able to form their formulate their own foreign policy without American influence epitomises why most of the developed world sees Russia as a threat. It's incredibly condescending , but it's the expected response from the Putinist cheer squad.
But hey, I guess we are all too stupid to make up our own minds when it comes to Russia so we just do the US' bidding because it's convenient.
It doesn't violate their territory, just gets really damn close.
Kinda like how the US-South Korea wargames play out from the perspective of North Koreans - not in their territory, but really damn close ohgoddidijustsaythat
by Jinwoy » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:09 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Jinwoy wrote:
It doesn't violate their territory, just gets really damn close.
Kinda like how the US-South Korea wargames play out from the perspective of North Koreans - not in their territory, but really damn close ohgoddidijustsaythat
So we're comparing war games with flights by bombers that have the potential to cause a mid-air accident?
by Saiwania » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:09 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Abkhazia and South Ossetia are the only two places in Georgia under dispute. The rest is universally recognized as sovereign Georgian territory.
by Jinwoy » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:16 am
Saiwania wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:Abkhazia and South Ossetia are the only two places in Georgia under dispute. The rest is universally recognized as sovereign Georgian territory.
So what gave Abkhazia the right to separate from Georgia when prior to 1992's war, it was almost half Georgian ethnically speaking and Abkhazia had to resort to ethnic cleansing? It seems to me that South Ossetia has a stronger basis for independence because even before, Ossetians made up a clear majority there.
by Costa Fierro » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:17 am
Saiwania wrote:So what gave Abkhazia the right to separate from Georgia when prior to 1992's war, it was almost half Georgian ethnically speaking and Abkhazia had to resort to ethnic cleansing? It seems to me that South Ossetia has a stronger basis for independence because even before, Ossetians made up a clear majority there.
by Respawn » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:18 am
Jinwoy wrote:It doesn't violate their territory, just gets really damn close.
Kinda like how the US-South Korea wargames play out from the perspective of North Koreans - not in their territory, but really damn close ohgoddidijustsaythat
Jinwoy wrote:Besides, the only people who think Russia would really begin spontaneous bombing runs in Europe are slightly delusional and should be banned from holding anything sharper than a crayon.
by OMGeverynameistaken » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:29 am
Jinwoy wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
So we're comparing war games with flights by bombers that have the potential to cause a mid-air accident?
Its called Big Gun Diplomacy. Everyone does it, so we shouldn't act so shocked when someone does it to us.
Besides, the only people who think Russia would really begin spontaneous bombing runs in Europe are slightly delusional and should be banned from holding anything sharper than a crayon.
by Costa Fierro » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:30 am
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Jinwoy wrote:
Its called Big Gun Diplomacy. Everyone does it, so we shouldn't act so shocked when someone does it to us.
Besides, the only people who think Russia would really begin spontaneous bombing runs in Europe are slightly delusional and should be banned from holding anything sharper than a crayon.
It's also reconnaissance. Every time they make one of those flights, they get a ton of information. Position of radar installations, response times, air defense site locations, etc.
The US doesn't have to do that since they have things like the U-2. Russia simply has to resort to more direct methods.
by OMGeverynameistaken » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:32 am
Costa Fierro wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:It's also reconnaissance. Every time they make one of those flights, they get a ton of information. Position of radar installations, response times, air defense site locations, etc.
The US doesn't have to do that since they have things like the U-2. Russia simply has to resort to more direct methods.
Doesn't the Russian military possess spying satellites?
by Costa Fierro » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:35 am
by Saiwania » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:37 am
Costa Fierro wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by "right". And why should it matter? Both of them are only recognized by three UN member states anyway.
by Ainin » Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:40 am
Jinwoy wrote:Respawn wrote:Oh dear. Now you're just taking the piss.
Like I already said, the UK has its own reasons to be displeased at Russia, especially after the assassination of Litvinenko and the constant violations of British airspace by Russian aircraft (with the most recent one occurring only yesterday, funnily enough). As for Poland and the Baltics, well you shouldn't have to guess why they are so distrustful of Russia. Clue: it has very little to do with US foreign policy.
And there are plenty of differences, might I add. For example, the US wants to arm Ukraine, but the UK is saying Ukraine is not ready for it.
The fact that you cannot seem to accept that Western nations are able to form their formulate their own foreign policy without American influence epitomises why most of the developed world sees Russia as a threat. It's incredibly condescending , but it's the expected response from the Putinist cheer squad.
But hey, I guess we are all too stupid to make up our own minds when it comes to Russia so we just do the US' bidding because it's convenient.
It doesn't violate their territory, just gets really damn close.
Kinda like how the US-South Korea wargames play out from the perspective of North Koreans - not in their territory, but really damn close ohgoddidijustsaythat
by New Oyashima » Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:45 am
by Arglorand » Fri Feb 20, 2015 4:42 am
Ainin wrote:Jinwoy wrote:
It doesn't violate their territory, just gets really damn close.
Kinda like how the US-South Korea wargames play out from the perspective of North Koreans - not in their territory, but really damn close ohgoddidijustsaythat
Oh yes, the US and South Korea holding drills in South Korean territory is perfectly comparable to bombers on radio silence flying into a ICAO-recognised flight information region without following ATC orders, potentially causing a major aviation disaster?
by Arglorand » Fri Feb 20, 2015 4:45 am
Respawn wrote:Like I already said, the UK has its own reasons to be displeased at Russia, especially after the assassination of Litvinenko and the constant violations of British airspace by Russian aircraft (with the most recent one occurring only yesterday, funnily enough). As for Poland and the Baltics, well you shouldn't have to guess why they are so distrustful of Russia. Clue: it has very little to do with US foreign policy.
by Bears Armed » Fri Feb 20, 2015 5:11 am
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:[he US doesn't have to do that since they have things like the U-2. Russia simply has to resort to more direct methods.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Big Eyed Animation, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Free Land of The Free Land of Freedo, Imperializt Russia, Pannonium Imperium, Post War America, Valyxias, Vanuzgard, Yasuragi, Zancostan
Advertisement