Nadkor wrote:Dakini wrote:The fun part here is that if the women win, this ruling would also benefit all the men who work in the retail sector of the company too. You'd think it would be a win-win situation as far as it goes.
This will be because MRAs, like Ostro, don't actually care about helping men. They don't. You don't see them actually talking about or doing anything of any substance that would actually help men. No, instead they sit on the internet and complain that women only care about themselves and never do anything to help men (which, of course, is plainly untrue) . They will oppose anything that primarily benefits women and don't care that it may help men as well. They offer no solutions, no answers, and nothing of any value, instead focusing on spewing sexist bullshit in the direction of anybody who dares to challenge their worldview in an attempt to destroy them. And why won't the girl in English class have sex with them? After all, they were nice to her that one time so surely she owes them.
They're reactionaries who oppose any notion of equality between men and women. Why? Because, at heart, they're desperate misogynists struggling pathetically to keep the uppity women in our place - as objects existing solely for the enjoyment of men.
I've seen Ostro detail out ways he thinks problems can be solved. I've also seen him waffle about in anger-fueled rant posts. He's not a boogieman, despite the caricature of the MRA that so many enjoy.