by United Districts of 1 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:55 pm
by Conserative Morality » Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:01 pm
by United Districts of 1 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:06 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Yeah, I was incredibly upset until I heard that the actual ending can only be achieved on a New Game + file. I'm trying to burn through a play-through to find out if I can still get enjoyment out of the series. If that was just a rumor, and those three 'endings' were all Bioware was giving... I'll be damned if I buy another Bioware game ever again.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:19 pm
United Districts of 1 wrote:
I started screaming at my room-mate when he tried supporting the endings, they, to be blunt... took a shit on the series in one dumb cinematic.
by United Districts of 1 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:23 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:United Districts of 1 wrote:
I started screaming at my room-mate when he tried supporting the endings, they, to be blunt... took a shit on the series in one dumb cinematic.
More or less. I was incredibly angry at first, but now I'm hopeful on my new game + file. Of course, if that turns out to be a false rumor, I'm going to be twice as pissed.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:43 pm
United Districts of 1 wrote:Unless it's Shep and Tali building a house on Rannoch I'm gonna be somewhat disappointed."
by Norstal » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:36 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Kaukolastan » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:54 am
N. Enartio, Justifying his Nuclear Powered, "EMP Laser" Shooting, Nazi Flying Saucer wrote:It isn't bad, i used science.
by AETEN II » Sat Mar 10, 2012 7:31 am
"Quod Vult, Valde Valt"
Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put out in K.P.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:"Why'd the chicken cross the street?"
"Because your dad's a whore."
"...He died a week ago."
"Of syphilis, I bet."
by United Districts of 1 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:38 am
Kaukolastan wrote:This game seriously crushed me. Hundreds of hours, two hundred bucks, and six years of my life spent on a series (an amazing series), and then it all goes to piss in the final five minutes. I was actually numb-shocked by how appalling the ending was, made so much worse by the sheer glory of the game up to that point.
I have no hate, I love the game, up until those final five minutes. I just hope Bioware realizes how badly they burned their fans and tries to change up the endings with a patch. I'll forgive them then, and return the Mass Effect series into my top five games of all time. As it is, I have no desire to play it again, ever, in any form. Forget Mass Effect 4, or any MMO, I don't even want to play 1 & 2, which I already own (with all DLC).
Anywho, let's stay constructive here. They'll never listen to bitching, but they might listen to fans honestly criticizing. I found this facebook group that sums this up perfectly. If you agree, join it.
http://www.facebook.com/DemandABetterEn ... assEffect3
-K-stan
by Zersium » Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:56 am
AETEN II wrote:http://www.shacknews.com/article/72803/bioware-clarifies-mass-effect-3-multiplayer-in-relation-to-the#
No, you just need to play the MP dude. It's a dick move to force you to play multiplayer.
by Kaukolastan » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:16 am
AETEN II wrote:http://www.shacknews.com/article/72803/bioware-clarifies-mass-effect-3-multiplayer-in-relation-to-the#
No, you just need to play the MP dude. It's a dick move to force you to play multiplayer.
N. Enartio, Justifying his Nuclear Powered, "EMP Laser" Shooting, Nazi Flying Saucer wrote:It isn't bad, i used science.
by Zersium » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:58 am
Kaukolastan wrote:AETEN II wrote:http://www.shacknews.com/article/72803/bioware-clarifies-mass-effect-3-multiplayer-in-relation-to-the#
No, you just need to play the MP dude. It's a dick move to force you to play multiplayer.
Even if you do, the ending is just a palette-swap. IE: Blue explosion, green explosion, or red explosion. The "Super Secret Ending" adds a thirty second clip of someone in N7 armor waking up. It does not fix the problems.
by Zersium » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:22 pm
Conoga wrote:I thought it was all right.
Besides, I doubt it was Bioware's choice. The ending was probably altered by EA.
by AETEN II » Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:07 pm
Kaukolastan wrote:AETEN II wrote:http://www.shacknews.com/article/72803/bioware-clarifies-mass-effect-3-multiplayer-in-relation-to-the#
No, you just need to play the MP dude. It's a dick move to force you to play multiplayer.
Even if you do, the ending is just a palette-swap. IE: Blue explosion, green explosion, or red explosion. The "Super Secret Ending" adds a thirty second clip of someone in N7 armor waking up. It does not fix the problems.
"Quod Vult, Valde Valt"
Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put out in K.P.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:"Why'd the chicken cross the street?"
"Because your dad's a whore."
"...He died a week ago."
"Of syphilis, I bet."
by Zersium » Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:01 pm
by Hittanryan » Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:55 pm
by Norstal » Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:10 am
Conoga wrote:I thought it was all right.
Besides, I doubt it was Bioware's choice. The ending was probably altered by EA.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Norstal » Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:11 am
Hittanryan wrote:None of my choices mattered. Mass relays destroyed, vast majority of the galaxy is dead. The Normandy got marooned.
I could've plowed through without doing all those sidequests this whole time, and it wouldn't have made a difference. I've wasted several hundred hours of my life with this trilogy.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Hittanryan » Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:46 am
by Norstal » Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Hittanryan wrote:Even if that ending isn't real, it's still massively unsatisfying and left me dead inside. Besides, DLC is bullshit. I already paid $60 for the game, why should I have to pay more for content that should've shipped with the full release? Bioware's going to have to pull one hell of a "Broken Steel" to fix this ending.I wanted a showdown with Harbinger. A real one. He was the villain from ME2, and according to the Codex the oldest, largest, and one of the most powerful Reapers. Instead all we get for a "final boss" is a horde of various Husks, the composition of which is duplicated at least once (Marauders and Banshees), and Harbinger just blasts you and takes off. Hell, I'd have settled with a fight with some leftover Collectors (imagine the player's reaction when they hear those dreaded three words: ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL).
Everything up to the last 5 minutes had been nothing short of outstanding. It's like when Bioware was working on the ending, they brought in some pretentious, artsy prick who'd never played a Mass Effect game before and decided to go all "True Art is Angsty" on us. He loads it down with "God-child works in mysterious ways" bullshit and destroys galactic civilization as we know it for shits and giggles. Then he maroons the Normandy. All the characters we've come to care about for so long, having helped them grow as people, get put on a fucking bus. Oh, and he's condemned Garrus and Tali (or everyone but them) to starvation if the food on that planet is levo-amino acid (or vice versa). Let's not forget you need eezo for FTL, which leaves those fleets stranded in Sol. So much for the Homeworld, eh quarians?
The worst part is that the rest of the game had been building up to so much more (at least in my Paragon playthrough). Krogan, salarians, turians, quarians, geth all at peace, united in opposition to the Reapers. The military strength basically doesn't affect the end battle at all. The bad ending should come if your allies aren't strong enough, then they can't get the Crucible (which should really just be a Reaper-killer) in position and the Reapers win. To me the endings where the war is won were being built up to two main choices, each with tradeoffs:
(Paragon) "Destroy the Reapers." This leaves the galaxy with centuries of rebuilding ahead of it, but tying in with the Paragon's essential philosophy of hope, the series would end on the notion that nothing is impossible if we put our minds to it. There is also no guarantee that the chaotic, disparate races wouldn't eventually fall back to their old ways (resurgent krogan, quarian-geth relations). However, paraphrasing Shepard himself: "People can be assholes sometimes, but they're trying. They deserve that chance." Shepard himself would dedicate the rest of his life to the reconstruction effort, while enjoying the newfound peace in the company of his band of brothers, the Normandy crew.
(Renegade) "Control the Reapers." With humanity in full control of the Reapers and their advanced technology, the shattered galaxy recovers quickly and surpasses the civilization that came before it. Instead of the bickering factions, you have a united, orderly, peaceful civilization. However, in keeping with Renegade Shepard's pro-human, Cerbeus-sympathetic leanings, humanity is on the top of the pecking order, dominating the 'lesser' races. Whether we go full-on Galactic Empire, or even Imperium of Man, is up to the player's imagination, but one thing is certain: Shepard has crushed everything in his path to become the single most powerful man in galactic history.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Zersium » Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:40 pm
Norstal wrote:Hittanryan wrote:Even if that ending isn't real, it's still massively unsatisfying and left me dead inside. Besides, DLC is bullshit. I already paid $60 for the game, why should I have to pay more for content that should've shipped with the full release? Bioware's going to have to pull one hell of a "Broken Steel" to fix this ending.I wanted a showdown with Harbinger. A real one. He was the villain from ME2, and according to the Codex the oldest, largest, and one of the most powerful Reapers. Instead all we get for a "final boss" is a horde of various Husks, the composition of which is duplicated at least once (Marauders and Banshees), and Harbinger just blasts you and takes off. Hell, I'd have settled with a fight with some leftover Collectors (imagine the player's reaction when they hear those dreaded three words: ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL).
Everything up to the last 5 minutes had been nothing short of outstanding. It's like when Bioware was working on the ending, they brought in some pretentious, artsy prick who'd never played a Mass Effect game before and decided to go all "True Art is Angsty" on us. He loads it down with "God-child works in mysterious ways" bullshit and destroys galactic civilization as we know it for shits and giggles. Then he maroons the Normandy. All the characters we've come to care about for so long, having helped them grow as people, get put on a fucking bus. Oh, and he's condemned Garrus and Tali (or everyone but them) to starvation if the food on that planet is levo-amino acid (or vice versa). Let's not forget you need eezo for FTL, which leaves those fleets stranded in Sol. So much for the Homeworld, eh quarians?
The worst part is that the rest of the game had been building up to so much more (at least in my Paragon playthrough). Krogan, salarians, turians, quarians, geth all at peace, united in opposition to the Reapers. The military strength basically doesn't affect the end battle at all. The bad ending should come if your allies aren't strong enough, then they can't get the Crucible (which should really just be a Reaper-killer) in position and the Reapers win. To me the endings where the war is won were being built up to two main choices, each with tradeoffs:
(Paragon) "Destroy the Reapers." This leaves the galaxy with centuries of rebuilding ahead of it, but tying in with the Paragon's essential philosophy of hope, the series would end on the notion that nothing is impossible if we put our minds to it. There is also no guarantee that the chaotic, disparate races wouldn't eventually fall back to their old ways (resurgent krogan, quarian-geth relations). However, paraphrasing Shepard himself: "People can be assholes sometimes, but they're trying. They deserve that chance." Shepard himself would dedicate the rest of his life to the reconstruction effort, while enjoying the newfound peace in the company of his band of brothers, the Normandy crew.
(Renegade) "Control the Reapers." With humanity in full control of the Reapers and their advanced technology, the shattered galaxy recovers quickly and surpasses the civilization that came before it. Instead of the bickering factions, you have a united, orderly, peaceful civilization. However, in keeping with Renegade Shepard's pro-human, Cerbeus-sympathetic leanings, humanity is on the top of the pecking order, dominating the 'lesser' races. Whether we go full-on Galactic Empire, or even Imperium of Man, is up to the player's imagination, but one thing is certain: Shepard has crushed everything in his path to become the single most powerful man in galactic history.
I don't mind paying for the DLC actually, but I do hope they gave it out for free. I also remember that the reason BioWare made the Hammerhead DLC free in ME2 is to test out what kind of ground vehicle would be best for ME3. So, I know there's a low low low chance of this every happening, but, what if the same thing happens with ME3? I did saw Mako vehicles in London...such a (free) DLC involving ground vehicles to retcon the ending would not be a bad idea at all.
I know it's really far out there, but eh, one can hope.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. Like I said, if they don't make a DLC or the DLC is mediocre, you can just mod the game and get the ending you want.
by Hittanryan » Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:45 pm
Zersium wrote:Norstal wrote:I don't mind paying for the DLC actually, but I do hope they gave it out for free. I also remember that the reason BioWare made the Hammerhead DLC free in ME2 is to test out what kind of ground vehicle would be best for ME3. So, I know there's a low low low chance of this every happening, but, what if the same thing happens with ME3? I did saw Mako vehicles in London...such a (free) DLC involving ground vehicles to retcon the ending would not be a bad idea at all.
I know it's really far out there, but eh, one can hope.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. Like I said, if they don't make a DLC or the DLC is mediocre, you can just mod the game and get the ending you want.
We shouldn't have to pay, I mean, we paid for ME3, got a shitty ending, THEN had to pay for Day-One-DLC...
Sometimes, I wonder when Bioware stopped being cool.
by Conserative Morality » Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:57 pm
Hittanryan wrote:Dragon Age 2? I hear that game ended on a cliffhanger sequel hook with the main character having not accomplished much.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Immoren
Advertisement