Glen-Rhodes wrote:Aren't you the person who literally registered on our forums just to make a single post about how I should be kicked out of TSP?
Anyways, people's (and that's actually just a handful of people) problems with me have always been about what I did as MoFA, whenever I express an opposing opinion in the Assembly, or whenever I defend myself against some ridiculous charge. Never about anything I do *as an admin.* It's always about me not agreeing with their views.
Frankly, this is a game filled with people who argue without mercy and don't bother parsing their words to sound polite. The people who are actually complaining about this -- Cormac and Bel, for example -- made their names in this game by fighting with other people. So I'm really not sympathetic to hypocritical attacks on how I'm *so rude* and *so unpleasant* or a "jerk."
Cormac is a jerk. Belschaft is a jerk. So are you, too, Rach. Raven was on Discord talking about how he hates seeing my name and can't wait until the day I'm driven to quit this game.
Like seriously, shut up about it. We're all jerks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And here's a post that got me a 1 day ban, and Ridersyl a 1 day ban for stating "Can confirm" to: (Yes I will always be salty about this)
Literally the only difference between these two posts is the insult used, and they both mean generally the same thing. Oh, and GR insulted a greater number of people in his post. What does the mod team look at differently between these posts? I'm genuinely curious. Feel free to post more examples of subjective flaming, this is just the first thing I thought of.