No Discussion?

[Mavorpen]

*yawn*

I grow weary of these petty arguments, I have said what I needed and shall depart, however, anyone that wants to challenge my knowledge of the faith may TG me, I welcome the challenge of personally explaining to why most of the things you know about religion are misunderstood, completely wrong, or fabricated lies. If an intellectual conversing is more your suit, that shall be as welcomed.

If you won't even acknowledge others, why should anyone listen to you?

I'm not acknowledging them for the simple fact that reply seems unnecessary, I don't have to acknowledge them for them to have said something. My input is not needed after every post.

It seems as though the OP is more focused on arguing whether other posts are worth replying to than actually discussing his own topic.

[The Archregimancy]

It seems as though the OP is more focused on arguing whether other posts are worth replying to than actually discussing his own topic.

I don't think that needs any direct action from us; being irritatingly condescending isn't inherently actionable. He doesn't seem to have started the thread just to troll - he just doesn't seem to like the direction discussion has taken.

Anyway, there's no thread ownership in General, so he can't control discussion, and plenty of other people are involved in discussion without him.