by The Dark Star Republic » Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:41 pm
by British Empire Strikes Back » Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:25 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:This proposal was meant to expire at the previous update. It made quorum. During the update, it lost 2 approvals, whether because people removed their approvals, or approvers lost their delegate status, or the quorum threshold inrceased, meaning that by the end of the update it needed 2 approvals and was set to time out "now".
At this update, it still needed 2 approvals. However, when update hit, the proposal did not time out.
This seems to be a bug, because once a proposal loses quorum, it should time out at the next update.
If I have misinterpreted the situation I apologise, but I would appreciate it being looked into. Note that even if the proposal then subsequently reaches quorum again, it should still arguably be removed as it should already have timed out.
by Jean Pierre Trudeau » Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:48 am
British Empire Strikes Back wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:This proposal was meant to expire at the previous update. It made quorum. During the update, it lost 2 approvals, whether because people removed their approvals, or approvers lost their delegate status, or the quorum threshold inrceased, meaning that by the end of the update it needed 2 approvals and was set to time out "now".
At this update, it still needed 2 approvals. However, when update hit, the proposal did not time out.
This seems to be a bug, because once a proposal loses quorum, it should time out at the next update.
If I have misinterpreted the situation I apologise, but I would appreciate it being looked into. Note that even if the proposal then subsequently reaches quorum again, it should still arguably be removed as it should already have timed out.
I don't think it should be removed even if it reaches quorum! It had already reached quorum before the update, so it should stay in quorum.
by Mousebumples » Thu Apr 23, 2015 2:20 pm
by The Dark Star Republic » Thu Apr 23, 2015 2:29 pm
Mousebumples wrote:I don't know timing of things - and if there's a way to find it in the GM tools, I don't know where to look - but is it possible that the proposal was, perhaps, due to expire at, say, the most recent minor update? (*yes, it's still there, and no, I don't know why)
I also seem to vaguely recall (*based on memory not actual photographic evidence or anything) historically, that if a nation makes quorum and falls below quorum, it has an update or so to get back to quorum.
by Mousebumples » Thu Apr 23, 2015 2:37 pm
The Dark Star Republic wrote:Mousebumples wrote:I don't know timing of things - and if there's a way to find it in the GM tools, I don't know where to look - but is it possible that the proposal was, perhaps, due to expire at, say, the most recent minor update? (*yes, it's still there, and no, I don't know why)
It was meant to time out 3 updates ago. It made quorum. It then lost approvals. At the next update it was (2 approvals required) but it did not time out. At the next update it was back to quorum again.I also seem to vaguely recall (*based on memory not actual photographic evidence or anything) historically, that if a nation makes quorum and falls below quorum, it has an update or so to get back to quorum.
Yes, that's my understanding too. My point is in this case it didn't make it back to quorum in time for the next update.
by The Dark Star Republic » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:04 pm
by British Empire Strikes Back » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:37 pm
The Dark Star Republic wrote:Oh, I see. Yes, that's right, but you have it inverted: it was quorate at the minor updates, and below the threshold at the major update.
In that case we'd have to wait until the next-but-one update, which is when the proposal would actually go to vote, so I still think it's worth looking into.
by Phydios » Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:35 pm
British Empire Strikes Back wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:Oh, I see. Yes, that's right, but you have it inverted: it was quorate at the minor updates, and below the threshold at the major update.
In that case we'd have to wait until the next-but-one update, which is when the proposal would actually go to vote, so I still think it's worth looking into.
When is the next update?
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Mousebumples » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:27 pm
by The Dark Star Republic » Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:52 pm
by British Empire Strikes Back » Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:58 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:proposal is kill
Still not entirely sure why it didn't time out the first time, but the problem seems to have been resolved anyway.
by Mousebumples » Fri Apr 24, 2015 4:17 am
by British Empire Strikes Back » Fri Apr 24, 2015 11:10 am
by The Sheika » Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:17 pm
by Mousebumples » Fri Apr 24, 2015 2:00 pm
The Sheika wrote:British Empire Strikes Back wrote:Yes, I know. But I put so much work into it, campaigning for hours on end, I just don't know if I can do it again.
With a little bit of work, and a willingness to cooperate with other members in the WA, you may find it easier to go about your proposal a second time around. I do have to admit that what you were trying to accomplish was admirable, but you have to be patient and willing to compromise when it comes down to writing a proposal.
One suggestion that you could try would be instead of banning the palm oil, why not ban the most harmful methods of harvesting the product?
by Ballotonia » Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:36 am
Mousebumples wrote:I also seem to vaguely recall (*based on memory not actual photographic evidence or anything) historically, that if a nation makes quorum and falls below quorum, it has an update or so to get back to quorum. But, honestly, I'm not a techie, so I'm not really sure on that.
by Kaboomlandia » Sun Apr 26, 2015 8:24 am
by The Dark Star Republic » Sun Apr 26, 2015 8:26 am
Ballotonia wrote:Nope, the system is harsh: at the beginning of update it checks for quorum and discards when the time has expired and quorum isn't there at that time. If a proposal has to sit in queue for some time while being expired, it has to maintain quorum at each update to not get discarded.
The system logs say the proposal was at quorum all the way until it was discarded.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Diarcesia, Giovanniland, Grishahakkaverchynot, Kiamai, Mad Jack Is Rejected, Migre, New Illyricum, Shirahime, The H Corporation, The Terren Dominion
Advertisement