by Crumlark » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:18 pm
by New Kvenland » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:21 pm
by Indian Empire » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:30 pm
Crumlark wrote:In light of some widely publicized shared-accounts gone wrong, I would like to bring a suggestion to the attention of Game Admins; Shared Accounts 2.0.
On founding a nation, there is an option to introduce additional 'personalities', separate log-in's that have passwords independent of eachother, with only the original founder having access to permissions to more than one personality or the ability to establish more personalities. Actions taken by one personality outside of the account (dispatches, forum posts) can be undone or modified by other personalities as if they were the same user.
This would improve the game by lowering the amount of trust needed to have an account shared, and open a new form of account raiding that relies more heavily on speed and skill than dominating an account and taking as much time as you wish.
by New Kvenland » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:33 pm
Indian Empire wrote:Crumlark wrote:In light of some widely publicized shared-accounts gone wrong, I would like to bring a suggestion to the attention of Game Admins; Shared Accounts 2.0.
On founding a nation, there is an option to introduce additional 'personalities', separate log-in's that have passwords independent of eachother, with only the original founder having access to permissions to more than one personality or the ability to establish more personalities. Actions taken by one personality outside of the account (dispatches, forum posts) can be undone or modified by other personalities as if they were the same user.
This would improve the game by lowering the amount of trust needed to have an account shared, and open a new form of account raiding that relies more heavily on speed and skill than dominating an account and taking as much time as you wish.
No. This could be a way for banned users to sneak in.
by Nephmir » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:41 pm
GP References
Military Gameplay
Login Script
Manual Recruitment
The 300 Endorsements of Nephmir
"100 by land, 100 by air, 100 by sea."
Mercenary of The Sable Order
Commander in Project Soul
by Kuduri Federation » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:42 pm
Crumlark wrote:In light of some widely publicized shared-accounts gone wrong, I would like to bring a suggestion to the attention of Game Admins; Shared Accounts 2.0.
On founding a nation, there is an option to introduce additional 'personalities', separate log-in's that have passwords independent of eachother, with only the original founder having access to permissions to more than one personality or the ability to establish more personalities. Actions taken by one personality outside of the account (dispatches, forum posts) can be undone or modified by other personalities as if they were the same user.
This would improve the game by lowering the amount of trust needed to have an account shared, and open a new form of account raiding that relies more heavily on speed and skill than dominating an account and taking as much time as you wish.
by New Raffica » Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:51 pm
by Cornupication » Fri Dec 26, 2014 4:57 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Fri Dec 26, 2014 7:51 pm
Cornupication wrote:If you're daft enough to give out account details, you don't deserve extra protection.
by Indian Empire » Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:22 am
by New Kvenland » Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:25 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:New Kvenland wrote:Isn't that what DoS's are for, or am I mistaken?
DoS means "Delete On Sight". So if you hand access to a Founder nation to a DOS player, you lose your founder nation. No argument, no appeal. So no, I think that's a very valid point.Cornupication wrote:If you're daft enough to give out account details, you don't deserve extra protection.
Pretty much this.
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:37 am
by Ballotonia » Sun Dec 28, 2014 11:18 am
by Bears Armed » Mon Dec 29, 2014 4:19 am
Ballotonia wrote:Better approach would be to request functionality which would make it no longer desirable to share accounts in the first place.
by Reploid Productions » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:32 am
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Sichuan Pepper » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:52 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: [violet], Card Cleaver, Fauxia, Majestic-12 [Bot], Torregal
Advertisement