NATION

PASSWORD

NationStates Issues **SPOILER ALERT**

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10550
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:57 pm

It's not a matter of validity, it's just an option that has only been recently added.

Based on the effect line "the state believes that nature-oriented summer camps will somehow solve youth crime", I suspect it may not work that well.

User avatar
Argentine-Colombia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Argentine-Colombia » Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:48 pm

Wow.
Argentine-Colombia
Regional Founder and President of The Kingdom of Empires

User avatar
Bears Armed Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 862
Founded: Jul 26, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed Mission » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:22 am

Trotterdam wrote:Based on the effect line "the state believes that nature-oriented summer camps will somehow solve youth crime", I suspect it may not work that well.

Sounds like something the Bears would try, though...
Haven't had that issue for quiet a while with either this nation or Bears Armed proper, as far as I can recall: Wonder whether I still qualify for it?
A diplomatic mission from Bears Armed, formerly stationed at the W.A. . Population = either thirty-two or sixty-four staff, maybe plus some dependents.

GA & SC Resolution Author

Ardchoille says: “Bears can be depended on for decent arguments even when there aren't any”.

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:27 pm

Naasseners wrote:The listing for issue #109 (Karate Kids Cause Controversy) is missing the fourth option:
"Discipline? Oh heavens no, our lives are already too restricted by the iron cage of rules and policing," says unorthodox youth pastor George W. Goethe, seen weaving a basket from blades of grass. "Our young people need to reconnect with the spirit within, and the best way to do that is to be one with nature and appreciate the bounty all around us. Redirect some of those police funds to my summer camps, and then youths can learn how to live freely and simply by crafting their own supplies from scratch."

...actually, I don't remember seeing that choice before. Even though I've seen the issue itself numerous times by now.

I have appended the new fourth option.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
The Bloody Lamb
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Feb 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Issue #488

Postby The Bloody Lamb » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:49 am

Hello, I received issue #488 and I don't find it here, so I post it:

Issue #488: Bright Orange Is The New Black

The Issue
A misunderstanding involving a 12 year old boy, a plastic toy gun, and 5 heavily armed police officers has resulted in substantial public uproar. The major news networks are having a field day over-analyzing the manufacturing and selling of bright orange sci-fi inspired toy guns for children.

The Debate
"We're raising a generation of natural born killers!" writes left-wing mommy-blogger Gretel Song in her latest Barryblog post. "Next thing you know, they'll want to play with real guns! When will it end? Remember, people don't kill people, guns do! Even toy guns! We need to get anything that even remotely resembles a gun off the market!"

"Hey! That's our jobs you're talking about!" bemoans Jean-Paul Anderson the CEO of Big Toys Inc. between puffs of his comically large cigar. "Banning our most popular toy lines would seriously damage our industry. I'd say the best way to handle this situation is a healthy corporate tax break. If we paid less taxes, we could up production and flood the market with so many toy guns that no kid would even want one! Then we sell them something better," he says, letting out a long eerie laugh as cigar smoke fills the room.

"Y'all gotta be kiddin' me," grumbles local gun enthusiast, Howard Summers before spitting into a tin can near the doorway. "Plastic toy rayguns ain't doin' nobody no harm. When I was li'l we played with BB guns all th' dad-gum time! Y'all wanna ban toy guns? Shoot, we should giv'em real guns! Make it legal, n' all. I bet it'd even lower crime rates! Who’d wanna rob a house knowing little Tommy has a 9 mil?"

Issue by: The Federative Orvəić States of Orvius
Editor: Sleep
Last edited by The Bloody Lamb on Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:50 am, edited 2 times in total.
The blood of the lamb is worth two lions

Charter member of Marvellous Realms of Wonder

User avatar
Drachmaland
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Dec 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Drachmaland » Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:10 am

Issue #485: Really Real eSports Tournament

The Issue

After it was reported that the latest Maxemon eSports Tournament brought millions to the economy, gamers and industry representatives alike have called for the government to take eSports seriously.

The Debate

1. "eSports are just as popular as real sports, if not more," says top-tier player @@RANDOMNAME@@, seen wearing a Barrychu t-shirt. "If one tournament can generate that much money, imagine how much more year round tourneys will bring! I'll have you know that eSports require just as much skill and talent as so-called real-life ones. Our organizations have everything the professional sporting organizations have: drama, sweat, gambling, corrup-, err, competition. eSports are the future, and with some nice government grants we can really propel the industry forward."

2. "Sponsoring teams is all well and good, but what about those of us who design these games?" queries legendary video game designer @@RANDOMNAME@@. "eSports wouldn't exist if it weren't for the designers who pour their blood, sweat, and financial resources into these games. With government subsidies, @@NAME@@ can become a mecca for game developers. We should be fostering creativity so we can create better games that those angry WhoTube nerds won't be able to pick apart."

3. "This is ridiculous," scoffs professional football player @@RANDOMMALENAME@@, as he tosses a football to your unsuspecting aides, causing them to break a priceless vase. "These so-called eSports are nothing more than a bunch of nerds pressing buttons on controllers. I'd hardly call that a sport, more like a waste of time. Real men play football, hockey, and cricket. Our sports are a billion @@CURRENCY@@ industry. You'd be better off banning these mindless games and promoting real sports, and athletes, to @@NAME@@'s youth."

4. "You'd be surprised by how realistic these games are," comments your retired Defense Minister @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, while building a virtual army on her Nintensoft MX. "Games like Guilds of Battle III: The Nightmare of Shadow Ops Faction are shockingly similar to our military operations. If these youngsters want to shoot up some terrorists in cyberspace, perhaps we should draft them into the military and let them shoot our enemies IRL, as they would say. At the very least they'd be great pilots for our drone program!"

Issue by: The Federal Republic of Mexicaliforia
Editor: Nation of Quebec
Last edited by Drachmaland on Sun Feb 14, 2016 3:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pterodoria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Jun 27, 2014
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Pterodoria » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:21 am

Drachmaland wrote:Issue #485: Really Real eSports Tournament

The Issue

After it was reported that the latest Maxemon eSports Tournament brought millions to the economy, gamers and industry representatives alike have called for the government to take eSports seriously.

The Debate

1. "eSports are just as popular as real sports, if not more," says top-tier player @@RANDOMNAME@@, seen wearing a Barrychu t-shirt. "If one tournament can generate that much money, imagine how much more year round tourneys will bring! I'll have you know that eSports require just as much skill and talent as so-called real-life ones. Our organizations have everything the professional sporting organizations have: drama, sweat, gambling, corrup-, err, competition. eSports are the future, and with some nice government grants we can really propel the industry forward."

2. "Sponsoring teams is all well and good, but what about those of us who design these games?" queries legendary video game designer Don Laine. "eSports wouldn't exist if it weren't for the designers who pour their blood, sweat, and financial resources into these games. With government subsidies, @@NAME@@ can become a mecca for game developers. We should be fostering creativity so we can create better games that those angry WhoTube nerds won't be able to pick apart."

3. "This is ridiculous," scoffs professional football player @@RANDOMMALENAME@@, as he tosses a football to your unsuspecting aides, causing them to break a priceless vase. "These so-called eSports are nothing more than a bunch of nerds pressing buttons on controllers. I'd hardly call that a sport, more like a waste of time. Real men play football, hockey, and cricket. Our sports are a billion @@CURRENCY@@ industry. You'd be better off banning these mindless games and promoting real sports, and athletes, to @@NAME@@'s youth."

4. "You'd be surprised by how realistic these games are," comments your retired Defense Minister @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, while building a virtual army on her Nintensoft MX. "Games like Guilds of Battle III: The Nightmare of Shadow Ops Faction are shockingly similar to our military operations. If these youngsters want to shoot up some terrorists in cyberspace, perhaps we should draft them into the military and let them shoot our enemies IRL, as they would say. At the very least they'd be great pilots for our drone program!"

Issue by: The Federal Republic of Mexicaliforia
Editor: Nation of Quebec

Interesting... it seems you don't receive option 4 if you don't have a military.
Puppet of Pencil Sharpeners 2. Drugs and capitalism.

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:34 am

Christian Democrats, Issue #462 wrote:1. @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, your Minister for Creative Solutions, explains her position.

I got a man's name and "explains their position."
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
The Bloody Lamb
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Feb 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bloody Lamb » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:48 am

Issue #486: An Impressing Dilemma

With reports of national enlistment rates decreasing, some concerned citizens have come to your office to offer their own various solutions.

The Debate
Captain @@RANDOMNAME@@, on shore leave after a tenth tour of service, has an idea. "The truth is that we just aren't getting enough volunteers for the armed forces, so we should, ahem, encourage people to volunteer. If everyone that enlisted were promised free alcoholic drinks as long as they served, then you'd see more people show up to our recruitment events. Then once they're good and drunk we can ship them off to a military base to start a new life. By the time they realize they've signed up for a five year tour of duty, they'll have no choice but to be good and loyal conscri - er, volunteers."

"You want the army to foot the bill for keggers and then kidnap people?" questions @@RANDOMNAME@@, an army medic in training. "There's a much better way to encourage enlistment rather than getting people blackout drunk. A portion of the military budget could be devoted to educating prospective soldiers and officers who promise to serve for, say, six years. Then the armed forces will have more qualified staff, and poor people will have a way to go to college. @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ will love it."

"Since when do @@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@ soldiers need to be from The Bloody Lamb?" asks @@RANDOMNAME@@, a headhunter who just arrived home from a business trip. "There are plenty of unemployed - and dare I say overqualified - Brasilistanis when it comes to warfare. Why not just import some mercenaries from abroad? It's not the patriotic thing to do, but as long as they can get the job done, who cares? You could even save some money on military training, since so many of them already know close quarters combat."

"Or we could completely regear our population for total war and utopian health," says @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ @@CAPITAL@@, your Minister of Alternative Solutions. "Vat technology and intensive psychological conditioning can promise a wonderful future devoid of weaklings who are vulnerable to disease. With enough government investment, I can promise a new generation of fearless, asexual grunts eager to die for the glory of Nick."


Issue by: The United States of Araluen and Eyreland
Editor: Lenyo
The blood of the lamb is worth two lions

Charter member of Marvellous Realms of Wonder

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10550
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:53 am

Wow. Four new issues get added to the game at the same time and immediately there are threads asking for help on three of them.

Y'all've still gotta post the last one :)

User avatar
Drachmaland
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Dec 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Drachmaland » Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:05 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #477 has been added.

Issue #477 has a 4th option:

4. "Here we go with the food police again," sighs Burger Queen CEO @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ as he chows down on a double bacon cheeseburger. "How about you health nuts stop telling me what food I can put in my body? These kids are perfectly capable of making their own choices. If they would rather enjoy one of our delicious burgers instead of some gross salad then who are we to stop them? Sure, they'll probably have a heart attack or two by the time they're my age, but it's better to die fat and free than old and controlled!"

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:06 pm

Just want to clarify that the character in #466 is named Jacques Strap, not a random name.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:08 pm

I've added Issues #485, #486, and #488. We're looking for #487, guys.

A few questions
Issue #485, Option 1 -- What is a Barrychu?

Issue #485, Option 2 -- Is the name supposed to be "Don Laine" or a random name?

Issue #486, Option 4 -- Who in the world is @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ @@CAPITAL@@?

Issue #486, Option 4 -- Glory of Nick? Who's Nick?

Issue #488, Option 1 -- What is a Barryblog?

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
Christian Democrats, Issue #462 wrote:1. @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, your Minister for Creative Solutions, explains her position.

I got a man's name and "explains their position."

I've made the change; but I must register my disapproval of the new, inappropriate use of their. Unless the Minister of Creative Solutions is a monarch, it makes no sense to use the plural. Even then, I've never been a fan of the royal plural.

Drachmaland wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #477 has been added.

Issue #477 has a 4th option:

4. "Here we go with the food police again," sighs Burger Queen CEO @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ as he chows down on a double bacon cheeseburger. "How about you health nuts stop telling me what food I can put in my body? These kids are perfectly capable of making their own choices. If they would rather enjoy one of our delicious burgers instead of some gross salad then who are we to stop them? Sure, they'll probably have a heart attack or two by the time they're my age, but it's better to die fat and free than old and controlled!"

New option added.

Nation of Quebec wrote:Just want to clarify that the character in #466 is named Jacques Strap, not a random name.

Which @@RANDOMNAME@@? In Issue #466, the main character is Mike Ronation.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10550
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:19 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #485, Option 1 -- What is a Barrychu?
Probably a pun on some-or-other video game character. Pikachu is likely.

Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #486, Option 4 -- Who in the world is @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ @@CAPITAL@@?
Probably wrong. I can't tell you what the correct version is, though.

Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #486, Option 4 -- Glory of Nick? Who's Nick?
Nick should be @@LEADER@@. You can tell if you look at the nation who posted it.

Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #488, Option 1 -- What is a Barryblog?
A fictional blogging website, obviously.

You can reasonably assume that anything with "Barry" in it is a reference to Max Barry.

User avatar
Phydios
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Dec 06, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Phydios » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:52 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:I've made the change; but I must register my disapproval of the new, inappropriate use of their. Unless the Minister of Creative Solutions is a monarch, it makes no sense to use the plural. Even then, I've never been a fan of the royal plural.

No, no, no. This is neither a new nor an inappropriate use of the word. The singular they has been in common use since at least the 14th century. (Chaucer used it in The Pardoner's Prologue, written in 1395.) The idea that it was inappropriate didn't come up until the end of the 19th century. Dislike it if you wish, but don't call it new.
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’
James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23

User avatar
Drachmaland
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Dec 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Drachmaland » Sun Feb 14, 2016 3:35 am

Christian Democrats wrote:A few questions
Issue #485, Option 2 -- Is the name supposed to be "Don Laine" or a random name?

You are right, I missed that one — it should be simply @@RANDOMNAME@@.

Christian Democrats wrote:A few questions
Issue #486, Option 4 -- Who in the world is @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ @@CAPITAL@@?

My data show it must be just @@RANDOMNAME@@.

Phydios wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:I've made the change; but I must register my disapproval of the new, inappropriate use of their. Unless the Minister of Creative Solutions is a monarch, it makes no sense to use the plural. Even then, I've never been a fan of the royal plural.

No, no, no. This is neither a new nor an inappropriate use of the word. The singular they has been in common use since at least the 14th century. (Chaucer used it in The Pardoner's Prologue, written in 1395.) The idea that it was inappropriate didn't come up until the end of the 19th century. Dislike it if you wish, but don't call it new.

+1

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:53 am

Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #485, Option 1 -- What is a Barrychu?


A Barrychu is a "Maxemon", which is obviously a parody of Pokemon. Barrychu = (Max) Barry + Pikachu.

Which @@RANDOMNAME@@? In Issue #466, the main character is Mike Ronation.


Jaques Strap is the character in option #4.
Last edited by Nation of Quebec on Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Flying Fortresses
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Apr 17, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Flying Fortresses » Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:37 am

Issue #487: Masks Of Shame

The Issue

After a young woman died of suffocation while wearing a traditional 'Mask of Shame' - an archaic custom exclusive to rural areas of Southern Flying Fortresses - several civil rights groups have called on the government to intervene and outlaw this cultural practice aimed at humiliating those who transgress social norms.

The Debate

"She was only sixteen," growls self-proclaimed humanitarian Barack McGuffin in a strong accent distinct to the East End of Lastors. "These backwoods nut-cases have been humiliating people, especially young women, for centuries. Merely being accused of scolding or wearing the wrong shirt can buy you a week in the mask. They even come with a studded gag to keep you from speaking. Not many people know that. This horrendous practice must be outlawed, and we should start a thorough re-education program to stomp out all their medieval ways."

"This was just a tragic mishap; the masks are harmless," scoffs local mask shop owner Dave Shiomi, while trying on a pig-devil mask, distorting his voice into a high-pitched whistle. "In fact, why don't you deepen our traditions? Unchecked degenerates tear asunder the social fabric and must be punished. While we have prison for the hardened criminals, I propose that we impose the 'Mask of Shame' as a valid form of punishment nationwide for gossipers, adulterers and other derelicts."

Noted historian and decentralization advocate Fleur Khan has another idea. "These masks might be unorthodox, but the real problem here is our official penal system. Incarcerating people in tiny spaces, regulating every minute of their day and every inch of their life, completely isolating them from society; talk about cruel and unusual punishment! These masks, and other forms of 'public shaming', on the other hand, are a time-tested practice for bringing about social cohesion within communities. I say it's time government bureaucrats and populist politicians stop forcing their Lastors morality from above. Abolish the entire penal system and make 'community shaming' the official tool for enforcing justice."

Issue by: The Very Confident Teenagers of Ayzifa
Editor: Gnejs
The Airgonautic Commonwealth of Flying Fortresses
Flying ambassador of the Realm of the Hiperurànion and its allies
Hiperuranion ~ Isyiiara ~ The Dejected Realms

User avatar
The Bloody Lamb
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Feb 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bloody Lamb » Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:43 am

Christian Democrats wrote:A few questions
Issue #486, Option 4 -- Who in the world is @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ @@CAPITAL@@?

The "Minister of Alternative Solutions" in that issue, whose name appeared with a male name (that I can't remember) and a surname that turned out to be my nation's capital, so I assumed that his surname was taken from it.

Issue #486, Option 4 -- Glory of Nick? Who's Nick?

The current name for my nation's leader. I forgot to change that one.
The blood of the lamb is worth two lions

Charter member of Marvellous Realms of Wonder

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Feb 14, 2016 1:52 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #486, Option 4 -- Glory of Nick? Who's Nick?
Nick should be @@LEADER@@. You can tell if you look at the nation who posted it.

Ah, thank you. Fixed.

Trotterdam wrote:You can reasonably assume that anything with "Barry" in it is a reference to Max Barry.

*facepalm* Of course.

Phydios wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:I've made the change; but I must register my disapproval of the new, inappropriate use of their. Unless the Minister of Creative Solutions is a monarch, it makes no sense to use the plural. Even then, I've never been a fan of the royal plural.

No, no, no. This is neither a new nor an inappropriate use of the word. The singular they has been in common use since at least the 14th century. (Chaucer used it in The Pardoner's Prologue, written in 1395.) The idea that it was inappropriate didn't come up until the end of the 19th century. Dislike it if you wish, but don't call it new.

I should clarify. When I said "new," I was talking about the editors' decision to change "her" to "their" (i.e., the old version of the issue used "her" while the new version uses "their"). I was and am well aware that "their" has been used in the singular -- inappropriately I would add -- for several centuries. The "generic he" dates back to Middle English and, in an extended sense, even to Old English, when the words for he, she, and we were he, heo, and hie. In unknown cases, he could mean a he or a heo.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/heo#Old_English

Drachmaland wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:A few questions
Issue #485, Option 2 -- Is the name supposed to be "Don Laine" or a random name?

You are right, I missed that one — it should be simply @@RANDOMNAME@@.

Fixed.

Drachmaland wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:A few questions
Issue #486, Option 4 -- Who in the world is @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ @@CAPITAL@@?

My data show it must be just @@RANDOMNAME@@.

That's what I thought since random names often pull from the custom fields.

Nation of Quebec wrote:
Which @@RANDOMNAME@@? In Issue #466, the main character is Mike Ronation.

Jaques Strap is the character in option #4.

Ah, okay. Fixed.

Flying Fortresses wrote:Issue #487: Masks Of Shame

The Issue

After a young woman died of suffocation while wearing a traditional 'Mask of Shame' - an archaic custom exclusive to rural areas of Southern Flying Fortresses - several civil rights groups have called on the government to intervene and outlaw this cultural practice aimed at humiliating those who transgress social norms.

The Debate

"She was only sixteen," growls self-proclaimed humanitarian Barack McGuffin in a strong accent distinct to the East End of Lastors. "These backwoods nut-cases have been humiliating people, especially young women, for centuries. Merely being accused of scolding or wearing the wrong shirt can buy you a week in the mask. They even come with a studded gag to keep you from speaking. Not many people know that. This horrendous practice must be outlawed, and we should start a thorough re-education program to stomp out all their medieval ways."

"This was just a tragic mishap; the masks are harmless," scoffs local mask shop owner Dave Shiomi, while trying on a pig-devil mask, distorting his voice into a high-pitched whistle. "In fact, why don't you deepen our traditions? Unchecked degenerates tear asunder the social fabric and must be punished. While we have prison for the hardened criminals, I propose that we impose the 'Mask of Shame' as a valid form of punishment nationwide for gossipers, adulterers and other derelicts."

Noted historian and decentralization advocate Fleur Khan has another idea. "These masks might be unorthodox, but the real problem here is our official penal system. Incarcerating people in tiny spaces, regulating every minute of their day and every inch of their life, completely isolating them from society; talk about cruel and unusual punishment! These masks, and other forms of 'public shaming', on the other hand, are a time-tested practice for bringing about social cohesion within communities. I say it's time government bureaucrats and populist politicians stop forcing their Lastors morality from above. Abolish the entire penal system and make 'community shaming' the official tool for enforcing justice."

Issue by: The Very Confident Teenagers of Ayzifa
Editor: Gnejs

A very intriguing issue. Added. I think the editors should have made "pig-devil mask" say "@@ANIMAL@@-devil mask" though.
Last edited by Christian Democrats on Sun Feb 14, 2016 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Dunraven
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Jun 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Dunraven » Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:17 pm

Drachmaland wrote:Issue #485: Really Real eSports Tournament

After it was reported that the latest Maxemon eSports Tournament brought millions to the economy, gamers and industry representatives alike have called for the government to take eSports seriously.

Ah, just got this one.
...which is kind of odd because this nation has banned computers. What are they playing it on, abacuses? :meh:

User avatar
Bears Armed Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 862
Founded: Jul 26, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed Mission » Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:25 am

Dunraven wrote:
Drachmaland wrote:Issue #485: Really Real eSports Tournament

After it was reported that the latest Maxemon eSports Tournament brought millions to the economy, gamers and industry representatives alike have called for the government to take eSports seriously.

Ah, just got this one.
...which is kind of odd because this nation has banned computers. What are they playing it on, abacuses? :meh:

Maybeso the wording of your laws means that dedicated gaming consoles, which can't be programmed & used for any other role by their users, don't count as 'computers'?
A diplomatic mission from Bears Armed, formerly stationed at the W.A. . Population = either thirty-two or sixty-four staff, maybe plus some dependents.

GA & SC Resolution Author

Ardchoille says: “Bears can be depended on for decent arguments even when there aren't any”.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:43 am

Bears Armed Mission wrote:
Dunraven wrote:Ah, just got this one.
...which is kind of odd because this nation has banned computers. What are they playing it on, abacuses? :meh:

Maybeso the wording of your laws means that dedicated gaming consoles, which can't be programmed & used for any other role by their users, don't count as 'computers'?


Exactly. PC gaming isn't the only gaming. You can still have gaming on video game consoles and phones, which banning computers doesn't impact.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10550
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Mon Feb 15, 2016 12:43 pm

Gaming consoles could be programmed to do rather computer-like stuff if you wanted to, though. They have the hardware for it. Just usually nobody bothers because real computers do it better.

Either way, you need computers to program your console games, so if you don't have those then all your video games would need to be imported from other countries that use manufacturing processes that you've outlawed.

User avatar
Drachmaland
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Dec 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Drachmaland » Mon Feb 15, 2016 12:59 pm

Admittedly it's a thin line and actually a matter of definition here; i.e. what the Issues Team selects to be included in the banned item list — and what not. E.g. option 317.3 would lead to abolishing all computer-machines and all phones and even faxes (and in the name of God, that is) — and leave gaming consoles be (which could easily be accused for worse by the same Amish advocate), just because they're not explicitly mentioned?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads