Ideally. This is what happens when an issue is written by an American and edited by an Irishman.
Made them agree. Actually, looking at it, it was fine the way it was. Oh well. Minor change, doesn't matter much.
Advertisement
by Luna Amore » Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:36 pm
by Aculea » Sat Aug 15, 2015 1:30 pm
Traemont wrote:In situations like that, I always interpret the the issue as the press making a mountain out of a very rare molehill. Then I dismiss the issue unless I want to choose one of the responses for unrelated reasons.
by Traemont » Sat Aug 15, 2015 7:02 pm
Aculea wrote:Traemont wrote:In situations like that, I always interpret the the issue as the press making a mountain out of a very rare molehill. Then I dismiss the issue unless I want to choose one of the responses for unrelated reasons.
How do I tell the difference between an issue that mountains a molehill like #208 and you-should've-known-better deathtraps like #221 and #443?
by Trotterdam » Sat Aug 15, 2015 10:14 pm
Simple.Aculea wrote:How do I tell the difference between an issue that mountains a molehill like #208 and you-should've-known-better deathtraps like #221 and #443?
by Bears Armed » Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:24 am
by Sanctaria » Sun Aug 16, 2015 10:05 am
Bears Armed wrote:For issue #175: 'Is @@NAME@@ Too Promiscuous?', I suggest changing the third option's use of @@RANDOMNAME@@ to @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ instead because the bit about "@@RANDOMNAME@@ who is rumoured to have had more than a thousand lovers and even more children" seems a bit too implausible for a female human to me...
by Outer Sparta » Sun Aug 16, 2015 10:46 am
by Luna Amore » Sun Aug 16, 2015 11:06 am
Outer Sparta wrote:Issue 56, "Give Us Money!" Quoth the Poet:
"We need government help to promote culture." says Kathleen Han, chairperson of the National Poetry Society." There's a punctuation mistake: there's supposed to be a comma instead of a period.
by Schiltzberg » Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:25 am
ISSUE 445, OPTION 2
2."That's bloody ridiculous!" puffs red-faced protester, Josh Longfellow, blowing spittle all over their supercilious counterpart. "They're trying to paint all of this as something that any reasonable person would do - but it just isn't! I don't know every inch of the tax code, and it's not like I can get all these smug big-shots to hang around the flat and tell me how to 'structure my assets', or some other rubbish. They knew what they did was against the spirit of the law, if nothing else - take them for all they've got. It's only fair."
by Luna Amore » Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:43 am
Schiltzberg wrote:ISSUE 445, OPTION 2
2."That's bloody ridiculous!" puffs red-faced protester, Josh Longfellow, blowing spittle all over their supercilious counterpart. "They're trying to paint all of this as something that any reasonable person would do - but it just isn't! I don't know every inch of the tax code, and it's not like I can get all these smug big-shots to hang around the flat and tell me how to 'structure my assets', or some other rubbish. They knew what they did was against the spirit of the law, if nothing else - take them for all they've got. It's only fair."
The use of the word "their" in the first sentence is a typo. I realize that the writer put in that word instead of "his" or "hers," because he did not want the pronoun to conflict with the random name, but that does not make "their" a singular word. I would suggest changing the word "their" to a singular pronoun, like "his" or "hers," even though there is the risk of the random name coming up with a name from the opposite gender. At least it would be grammatically correct.
by Anonymous Proxy » Wed Aug 19, 2015 1:05 am
by Trotterdam » Wed Aug 19, 2015 10:13 am
None of these are errors. They're just issues doing amusingly silly (but in no way problematic) stuff because of weird things in custom fields. The game can't automagically parse your national motto to tell whether it's something your citizens would actually say proudly. It's just assumed. Which is more fun than issues never using your motto at all because of the inevitable possibility that it might not be appropiate for any given context.Anonymous Proxy wrote:you may want to look through this thread I made a while back: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=347131
by Luxdonia » Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:51 pm
by Luna Amore » Thu Aug 20, 2015 6:17 am
Luxdonia wrote:"What have those poor, defenceless animals ever done to us?" asks Declan Sparkle, owner of the East Luxdonia badger Sanctuary. "Kidnapping these helpless creatures from their habitat simply to stick probes and needles in them is just barbaric! How would you like it if someone caged you in a lab and conducted tests on you just to find out whether a new product was fit for sale? Experimenting on animals ought to be banned!"
Capital letter for sanctuary should be a lower case s.
Not sure about the East Luxdonia bit as well. It does seem out of place.
by Outer Sparta » Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:57 am
by Frisbeeteria » Thu Aug 20, 2015 2:25 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:I wonder in the underlined text, does that make sense grammatically? Maybe should be changed to "sitting in a lotus position?"
by Outer Sparta » Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:02 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:I wonder in the underlined text, does that make sense grammatically? Maybe should be changed to "sitting in a lotus position?"
No, "sitting in lotus position" is the correct usage. If you Google "sitting in a lotus position", all the responses are for "sitting in lotus position". It's standard usage.
by Lamebrainia » Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:55 pm
Like with cars- ban kids from using computers until they pass a test and get a license!
Like with cars: ban kids from using computers until they pass a test and get a license!
by Whovian Tardisia » Fri Aug 21, 2015 1:41 pm
Lamebrainia wrote:Like with cars- ban kids from using computers until they pass a test and get a license!
Suggested punctuation:Like with cars: ban kids from using computers until they pass a test and get a license!
Because the second half of the sentence explains on the first half.
There should be a space before the dash, at the very least
by Phydios » Fri Aug 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Whovian Tardisia wrote:Lamebrainia wrote:Suggested punctuation:
Because the second half of the sentence explains on the first half.
There should be a space before the dash, at the very least
The color you chose for that semicolon (at least I think it's a semicolon) is hard to see on a white background. at first I thought there were just 2 spaces. Red would be easier to see.
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Lamebrainia » Sat Aug 22, 2015 12:12 am
Whovian Tardisia wrote:The color you chose for that semicolon (at least I think it's a semicolon) is hard to see on a white background. at first I thought there were just 2 spaces. Red would be easier to see.
by Trotterdam » Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:29 am
by Luna Amore » Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:31 am
Lamebrainia wrote:Like with cars- ban kids from using computers until they pass a test and get a license!
Suggested punctuation:Like with cars: ban kids from using computers until they pass a test and get a license!
Because the second half of the sentence explains on the first half.
There should be a space before the dash, at the very least
by Aibohphobia » Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:30 am
Here we are mucking about with our inefficient technology and the birds have us beat!
Clearly we need to convert all our inefficient internet
by Frisbeeteria » Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:59 am
Aibohphobia wrote:There should be a comma
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement