Scouts in @@NAME@@?
After a recent rise of Scouting in the region, people have come to the steps of the Capitol to ask for the formation of a Scouting Movement
[Option]
“We should have Scouts only for men,” says @@RANDOMNAME@@, CEO of a @@MAJORINDUSTRY@@ Company. “Girls should be in the house anyways, cooking and doing our bidding!” he adds. “Scouts should be only for men, because they are the only people who do the hard work.”
[effect] Massive Civil Rights Demonstrations
[stats] Underground movements of Girl Scouts are being searched for by the Police
[Option]
“Why don’t we allow it for all genders?” says @@RANDOMNAME@@, your Minister of Defense, “but here’s the catch, we make Scouting a branch in the Military! Isn’t it brilliant! Then after 18 years of age, they can serve lifetime careers in the Military! MWAHAHAHAHAAA!”
[effect] Military spending increases
[stats] @@NAME@@'s Military increases due to forced conscription
[option]
“Hey, why do we need Scouting?” says @@RANDOMNAME@@, who’s sitting in a lawn chair and drinking a beer. “It’s the parents who should be disciplining the kids anyways, it isn’t to the job of total strangers to tell my kid what to do? No! Scouting should be outlawed!”
[effect] Children’s behavior decreases, tax income decreases
[stats] Children roam the streets with motorcycle gangs
[option]
“No! No! No! No!” says @@RANDOMNAME@@, Leader of the NationStates Scouting Movement. “Why don’t we just let Scouting be non-profit, voluntary organization in @@NAME@@? It would benefit Children’s behavior and lives, not only that, it will put a new feeling of patriotism into this fine country! Scouting should be allowed the flourish.”
[effect] Children’s behavior increases
[stats] Children of @@NAME@@ are regarded as the most behaved in the region.
Here is my issue above. I want to know what would help it become a better issue. Are there errors? loopholes? To many options? I'd like your input!
Thanks, and Happy Holidays!
Demphor
