Onderkelkia wrote:Northern Chtitowa, you are quite right that a more restrictive definition would record the number of participants in the FRA's central institutions, without affiliation to TRR and Lazarus, as 0 instead of 1 - revealing the true extent of its total dependence on those regions. The fact remains that you are the most active FRA member with no affiliation in Lazarus or TRR in modern times. If we put your false modesty to one side, it will be recognised that a person's importance within the FRA establishment is not related to how often they log on. The article was not suggesting that you were involved in the contemporary FRA's day-to-day decisions. You were the key figure in setting the early FRA's goals and the influence of your vision on its strategic direction continues.
I'm not sure that I've ever spoken to NC in my life. It's true that I have a tonne of respect for the work that he did, but with the greatest respect, as he'd tell you himself, it's a past-tense there.