Advertisement
by Vancouvia » Mon May 04, 2015 9:10 pm
by Onderkelkia » Tue May 05, 2015 1:16 am
Vancouvia wrote:I'm just curious--why do you think you have such high turnover?
by Riemstagrad » Tue May 05, 2015 11:04 am
by Valrifell » Tue May 05, 2015 4:36 pm
Riemstagrad wrote:It seems to me that your number of active players will stay the same, while the number of inactive players who never participate and never will participate, will see a significant drop. Lucky for you, they don't mean anything at all for the regional activity. Don't worry too much about this block i'd say. It won't hurt that much.
by Miss Brunhilde » Tue May 05, 2015 9:18 pm
But numbers look nice.
by Sedgistan » Mon May 11, 2015 9:44 am
by Onderkelkia » Mon May 11, 2015 9:52 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon May 11, 2015 9:53 am
Onderkelkia wrote:I am disappointed that the Administrators have not only kept the recruitment block against the LKE in place, despite the absence of any knowledge or consent on the part of anyone other than Bob Moran, but refused to alter the length of the recruitment block, when this effectively means our population will almost certainly deteriorate beyond the level where it likely otherwise would have been had it not been for Bob Moran's actions (assuming he began use of the illegal script at the point of the major uplift shown on [violet]'s graph), making a mockery of the idea this is simply about correcting the population.
by Zacherie » Mon May 11, 2015 9:56 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Onderkelkia wrote:I am disappointed that the Administrators have not only kept the recruitment block against the LKE in place, despite the absence of any knowledge or consent on the part of anyone other than Bob Moran, but refused to alter the length of the recruitment block, when this effectively means our population will almost certainly deteriorate beyond the level where it likely otherwise would have been had it not been for Bob Moran's actions (assuming he began use of the illegal script at the point of the major uplift shown on [violet]'s graph), making a mockery of the idea this is simply about correcting the population.
Agreed: totally disgusting judgement on the part of the mods. I'd love to know what the real motive is.
by Evil Wolf » Mon May 11, 2015 9:56 am
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon May 11, 2015 9:58 am
Zacherie wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Agreed: totally disgusting judgement on the part of the mods. I'd love to know what the real motive is.
The motive should be obvious, they want to let everyone know that collaborating with DoS players is not going to be tolerated, and that there will be severe punishments for it.
by Kazmr » Mon May 11, 2015 10:00 am
Evil Wolf wrote:
This is starting to get a little silly.
Keeping the recruitment ban on TBR makes sense, but now going after new regions that former TBR members have started, regions that have to be built from the ground up and have received no benefit from Halc or Bob's illegal recruitment? I don't see how that's justified.
by Shadoke » Mon May 11, 2015 10:01 am
Evil Wolf wrote:
This is starting to get a little silly.
Keeping the recruitment ban on TBR makes sense, but now going after new regions that former TBR members have started, regions that have to be built from the ground up and have received no benefit from Halc or Bob's illegal recruitment? I don't see how that's justified.
by Zacherie » Mon May 11, 2015 10:02 am
Evil Wolf wrote:
This is starting to get a little silly.
Keeping the recruitment ban on TBR makes sense, but now going after new regions that former TBR members have started, regions that have to be built from the ground up and have received no benefit from Halc or Bob's illegal recruitment? I don't see how that's justified.
by Evil Wolf » Mon May 11, 2015 10:04 am
Kazmr wrote:The punishment would be a total farce if virtually the entire remaining leadership of TBR could simply move somewhere with a different name and carry on like nothing happened.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Onderkelkia » Mon May 11, 2015 10:05 am
Evil Wolf wrote:
This is starting to get a little silly.
Keeping the recruitment ban on TBR makes sense, but now going after new regions that former TBR members have started, regions that have to be built from the ground up and have received no benefit from Halc or Bob's illegal recruitment? I don't see how that's justified.
by Zacherie » Mon May 11, 2015 10:07 am
Onderkelkia wrote:Evil Wolf wrote:
This is starting to get a little silly.
Keeping the recruitment ban on TBR makes sense, but now going after new regions that former TBR members have started, regions that have to be built from the ground up and have received no benefit from Halc or Bob's illegal recruitment? I don't see how that's justified.
Indeed, it involves targeting regions which didn't benefit from any population rise and individual players who are not connected to the wrongdoing.
Apart from the fact that the recruitment block will have a greater than commensurate effect om the regional populations concerned, the extension of the block to so-called proxy regions is the other unarguably unjustifiable element of the action which the administrative/moderator team has taken.
by Onderkelkia » Mon May 11, 2015 10:11 am
Zacherie wrote:Onderkelkia wrote:Indeed, it involves targeting regions which didn't benefit from any population rise and individual players who are not connected to the wrongdoing.
Apart from the fact that the recruitment block will have a greater than commensurate effect om the regional populations concerned, the extension of the block to so-called proxy regions is the other unarguably unjustifiable element of the action which the administrative/moderator team has taken.
DEN isn't a proxy region. The overwhelming majority of TBR's raider community straight up moved to DEN. It makes sense that DEN got the recruitment ban.
the Cimmerian Merc Unit getting the recruitment ban, however, is completely unjustified.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon May 11, 2015 10:12 am
Zacherie wrote:Onderkelkia wrote:Indeed, it involves targeting regions which didn't benefit from any population rise and individual players who are not connected to the wrongdoing.
Apart from the fact that the recruitment block will have a greater than commensurate effect om the regional populations concerned, the extension of the block to so-called proxy regions is the other unarguably unjustifiable element of the action which the administrative/moderator team has taken.
DEN isn't a proxy region. The overwhelming majority of TBR's raider community straight up moved to DEN. It makes sense that DEN got the recruitment ban.
the Cimmerian Merc Unit getting the recruitment ban, however, is completely unjustified.
by Evil Wolf » Mon May 11, 2015 10:14 am
Onderkelkia wrote:I don't know enough details about what other members of TBR knew to answer 1 with any degree of certainty (which might raise the question of whether DEN meets that test), but I assume the moderators would have taken action against other individuals if they were complicit. Unless Shogun knew, the application of the recruitment block to "Cimmerian Merc Unit", as you say, definitely fails both tests - as would its application to any LKE proxy regions.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Zacherie » Mon May 11, 2015 10:18 am
Onderkelkia wrote:The key tests should be:
1. Did the players specificaly concerned have any involvement in wrongdoing?
2. Did the region benefit from the wrongdoing?
I don't know enough details about what other members of TBR knew to answer 1 with any degree of certainty (which might raise the question of whether DEN meets that test), but I assume the moderators would have taken action against other individuals if they were complicit. Unless Shogun knew, the application of the recruitment block to "Cimmerian Merc Unit", as you say, definitely fails both tests - as would its application to any LKE proxy regions.
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:So...
Lots of people who broke no rules moved to a region that did not benefit from rules being broken, and is now punished for breaking rules?
Not understanding this one, sorry.
by Evil Wolf » Mon May 11, 2015 10:24 am
Zacherie wrote:If you could simply leave a recruitment banned and make a new one, regardless of who broke the rule, then recruitment bans would mean nothing.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon May 11, 2015 10:25 am
Zacherie wrote:Onderkelkia wrote:The key tests should be:
1. Did the players specificaly concerned have any involvement in wrongdoing?
2. Did the region benefit from the wrongdoing?
I don't know enough details about what other members of TBR knew to answer 1 with any degree of certainty (which might raise the question of whether DEN meets that test), but I assume the moderators would have taken action against other individuals if they were complicit. Unless Shogun knew, the application of the recruitment block to "Cimmerian Merc Unit", as you say, definitely fails both tests - as would its application to any LKE proxy regions.
The difference is that the Cimmerian Merc Unit is not a DEN or TBR proxy region.
Recruitment banning proxy regions of a recruitment banned region makes sense. Banning uninvolved regions does not make sense. Shogun is just as guilty as I am(Aurum Rider), and that is to say, not at all.
The Cimmerian Merc Unit, and my region are not recruiting for DEN or TBR, so why is the Cimmerian Merc Unit recruitment banned, and mine isnt? For that matter, DEN shares members with The Black Hawks, the Brotherhood of Malice, the Sekhmet Legion, among other regions.
If this is the case, then if the moderators are arbitrarily handing out recruitment bans on a whim for even the slightest involvement, then recruitment ban all of the raider regions and the regions owned by their members.
EDIT:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:So...
Lots of people who broke no rules moved to a region that did not benefit from rules being broken, and is now punished for breaking rules?
Not understanding this one, sorry.
Lots of people who broke no rules, who were given a recruitment ban, abandoned the region that was recrutment banned for another region.
If you could simply leave a recruitment banned and make a new one, regardless of who broke the rule, then recruitment bans would mean nothing.
by Zacherie » Mon May 11, 2015 10:36 am
Evil Wolf wrote:But that's the question the MOD team needs to ask themselves now. Is this recruitment ban intended to punish those that benefited from it and the region of The Black Riders, or is this recruitment ban intended to punish, for the next three months every single TBR player that was in the region at the time, regardless of what region they move to thereafter?
As I said before, this reeks of Mission Creep.
Zacherie wrote:If this is the case, then if the moderators are arbitrarily handing out recruitment bans on a whim for even the slightest involvement, then recruitment ban all of the raider regions and the regions owned by their members.
by Kazmr » Mon May 11, 2015 10:44 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Krayo29
Advertisement