Sparaxis wrote:That being the case why did TSP, on your watch, unban Milograd, who was convicted through due process, judge and jury, of the Superior Court of The South Pacific?
TSP established a Parole Board, with the sole purpose of addressing Indefinite Bans and the questionable fairness of such judgement. Milograd, having served over a year of that ban and taking into consideration:
1.) His behavior in NS since the time he was found guilty.
2.) His establishment of the PRL.
3.) His activity as a successful leader.
4.) His willingness to reform.
Were taken into consideration when granting him Parole status. I've heard such statements as "TSP is a place of second chances" and that was proven to be true the day Milograd was given that second chance.
The official ruling reads as follows:
Security:
Since receiving his ban from The South Pacific, Milograd faithfully served as Delegate of Lazarus and did so partially in efforts to show a change of character. Based on his work in Lazarus, the Parole Board found Milograd to no longer a security threat to The South Pacific.
Behavior Reform:
The Parole Board cited Milograd's Delegacy of Lazarus as partially sufficient grounds for showing a reformation of behavior, as well. In addition, Milograd showed an effort to make amends with The South Pacific before the option of Parole even existed. Based on these reasons, the Parole Board found Milograd shows a genuine willingness to reform behavior.
For these reasons, the Parole Board has unanimously ruled in favor of granting Milograd Parole, lifting his ban and allowing him to reside in The South Pacific. After six months of residency Milograd may apply for citizenship. If the Parole Board feels, at any time, that Milograd has become a security threat, or they feel Milograd is not contributing to The South Pacific in a positive way, the Parole Board may revoke Parole by a Majority Vote.
