The Rainbow Collective wrote:Anybody who thinks I would think the tactics of NRW would actually work, or seriously threaten the Osiris Fraternal Order, doesn't know me very well.
But you are part of NRW?
Advertisement
by Solorni » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:33 pm
The Rainbow Collective wrote:Anybody who thinks I would think the tactics of NRW would actually work, or seriously threaten the Osiris Fraternal Order, doesn't know me very well.
by The Rainbow Collective » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:43 pm
by Zenya » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:44 pm
by Misley » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:58 pm
Solorni wrote:Why is it that the moment communist regions start coming to the forefront we start entering Cold War style intrigue?
by Valrifell » Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:31 pm
Solorni wrote:Why is it that the moment communist regions start coming to the forefront we start entering Cold War style intrigue?
by Zenya » Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:46 pm
by Misley » Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:59 pm
by Zenya » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:01 pm
Misley wrote:Yes, if only we had "culture" like me getting drunk every other night and posting to the RMB about it begging for attention.
by Misley » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:14 pm
Zenya wrote:Ok, you obviously have no idea what culture is in NationStates ^_^
Proved my point.
Edit: But thanks for being an asshole and trying to make me look like an alcoholic in front of people ^_^
by Benjamin Henrikson » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:19 pm
Misley wrote:Yes, if only we had "culture" like me getting drunk every other night and posting to the RMB about it begging for attention.
by Misley » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:23 pm
by Verborgenen Herrn » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:32 pm
Captain Woodhouse wrote:NE sits soundly under UIAF-TNP control only because the UIAF required everyone and their dog’s assistance to retake it. Without everyone-and-their-dog’s help, you’d still be banging on the door like Jehovah’s witnesses at a meeting of the Atheist Alliance International.
All large-scale 'liberations' are composed of multiple organisations.
Had our point been active, the NE 'liberation' would not have succeeded - it's not a case of NE retaking it reflecting a military success for them, but a function of the point's inactivity. That was incompetence on our point's part, which he was reprimanded for, as outlined in the UIAF statement.
by Benjamin Henrikson » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:34 pm
by MSLuvsZenya » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:35 pm
by The Rainbow Collective » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:44 pm
MSLuvsZenya wrote:This kind of behavior has been characteristic of the "NS Left" (big fat air-quotes) ever since TCB's star started ascending.
by Misley » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:48 pm
by Onderkelkia » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:59 pm
Verborgenen Herrn wrote:All large-scale 'liberations' are composed of multiple organisations.
Had our point been active, the NE 'liberation' would not have succeeded - it's not a case of NE retaking it reflecting a military success for them, but a function of the point's inactivity. That was incompetence on our point's part, which he was reprimanded for, as outlined in the UIAF statement.
How is taking advantage of your weakness not a victory? Just because we didn't take the delegacy in a "conventional" battle with the delegate doesn't mean the operation wasn't a success. If an inattentive military unit gets surrounded and destroyed by the enemy, are you gonna claim that it's not a victory for the enemy just because the unit was not destroyed in a firefight?
Verborgenen Herrn wrote:I see you ignored Woodhouse's statement about cross-endorsers. Nowadays, unless the enemy point has under 20 endoes, no successful liberation is done via one massive update operation. All you have to do is continuously dump 20 to 30 cross-endorsing WAs into a region every update for a couple days until your endo count is large enough to allow you to knock out the delegate. Any invasion can be stopped by this technique, whether it has 10 or 100 support. The only reason that all invasions aren't stopped by this technique is that defenders don't always have enough morale to continuously rally people for updates.
UIAF and friends could have been stopped in their tracks the update after they took antiquity region Eastern Europe had the mania that accompanies our raids been applied to theirs.
by Benjamin Henrikson » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:02 pm
by Farnhamia » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:03 pm
by Sedgistan » Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:23 am
Misley wrote:Yes, if only we had "culture" like me getting drunk every other night and posting to the RMB about it begging for attention.
Misley wrote:Zenya wrote:Ok, you obviously have no idea what culture is in NationStates ^_^
Proved my point.
Edit: But thanks for being an asshole and trying to make me look like an alcoholic in front of people ^_^
Not trying to do anything of the sort. Just observing a trend in your RMB posts.
by Corvus Corax » Fri Jan 23, 2015 5:29 am
by The Rainbow Collective » Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:00 am
Zenya wrote:Pfft, this isn't near a war I don't play like that. I'm not the one writing critical articles about TI. I'm not the one making motions to ban ties with TI. I'm not the one proposing a Leftist condemnation of TI. They just looooooooooove wasting their time on TCB because frankly we fucking rule and are slowly becoming relevant
Zenya wrote:They need an enemy to distract their people from the shitty internal conditions of their region, a severe lack of organization and order, no culture whatsoever, barely any activity other than crying about TCB, etc.
Corvus Corax wrote:Could TRF/Antifa send one squadron to http://www.nationstates.net/region=the_greenup_alliance and endorse delegate Vandoosa within few hours?
It is most logical way of in-game retaliation for MOD-biased defenderists. After all TBR used the region as the Jump point.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bormiar
Advertisement