by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:39 pm
by Conscentia » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:43 pm
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Old Tyrannia » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:43 pm
by Benevolent Thomas » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:45 pm
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Old nations leave us all the time. It's sad but it happens. I don't think this means that NationStates is at the "end of an era."
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:54 pm
Ramaeus wrote:Hardly. Milograd is the only name on your list who is particularly noteworthy. The rest have hardly had any impact whatsoever. Nice try, though.
by The Leningrad Union » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:55 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I only think one name in your list is even worth remembering. We're still in the middle of an era. The era of petty and lame ass GCR drama
some popular TETer wrote:Leningrad iz kewl
some dude that agreed with me on a debate wrote:Just listen to Leningrad!
by The Leningrad Union » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:56 pm
some popular TETer wrote:Leningrad iz kewl
some dude that agreed with me on a debate wrote:Just listen to Leningrad!
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:57 pm
by The Leningrad Union » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:01 pm
some popular TETer wrote:Leningrad iz kewl
some dude that agreed with me on a debate wrote:Just listen to Leningrad!
by Ramaeus » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:03 pm
Indian Empire wrote:List edited in attempt to make the list with more substantial names and more accurate.
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:04 pm
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:05 pm
Ramaeus wrote:Indian Empire wrote:List edited in attempt to make the list with more substantial names and more accurate.
How have Generalites influenced GP? Additionally, most weren't particularity distraught over Afforess' departure. You appear to be judging influence based on your skewed perceptions. That is, by far, the worst way to go about judging impact.
by Britanania » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:06 pm
by Blekksprutia » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:07 pm
Indian Empire wrote:Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?
Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".
A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.
Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:07 pm
Britanania wrote:The only thing I have noticed is that since the beginning of this summer, the quality of RPs has dropped substantially
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:08 pm
Blekksprutia wrote:Indian Empire wrote:Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?
Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".
A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.
Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?
not to mention Thafoo
by Applebania » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:11 pm
by The Leningrad Union » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:12 pm
Blekksprutia wrote:Indian Empire wrote:Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?
Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".
A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.
Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?
not to mention Thafoo
some popular TETer wrote:Leningrad iz kewl
some dude that agreed with me on a debate wrote:Just listen to Leningrad!
by Indian Empire » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:14 pm
by Applebania » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:15 pm
Conscentia wrote:This is in the wrong forum. You should ask for this to be moved.
by Blekksprutia » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:15 pm
by Blekksprutia » Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:16 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement