How many of those magisters were members of the UDL, May I ask?
Advertisement
by South Pacific Belschaft » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:07 pm
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
by Xoriet » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:08 pm
by Blue Wolf II » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:10 pm
by Cerian Quilor » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:37 pm
Shadow Afforess wrote:Cerian Quilor wrote:He's not empowering defender leaning nations. He's grabbing onto people who otherwise were involved and uninterested and pulling them into his net.
And you missed the point.
The point being that Unibot's tactics were legally grey, bordering on rule-breaking? I don't keep the NS rules as some kind of moral handbook, so you'll forgive me if I don't care.
I'd bet money on TEP never even considering this without a big Uni propaganda campaign.
by Tabaqui » Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:13 am
by Blue Wolf II » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:05 am
by Babiana » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:11 am
by The Grim Reaper » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:11 am
Blue Wolf II wrote:So Prussia, Topid, and Milo don't count, I'm assuming.
Babiana wrote:I'm not sure Topid counts as one having ties to a defender group, though you may know different, Wolf.
by Amirgold » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:20 am
by Blue Wolf II » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:21 am
Babiana wrote:If you look at AMOM's part in this, he kept quiet and then finally voted for it. I suspect he is pretending to be disinterested but he wants to infiltrate the defender networks, steal their technology and bring them down.
by Bachtendekuppen » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:22 am
Blue Wolf II wrote:Babiana wrote:If you look at AMOM's part in this, he kept quiet and then finally voted for it. I suspect he is pretending to be disinterested but he wants to infiltrate the defender networks, steal their technology and bring them down.
Speaking of AMOM, wasn't he once the head of UDL's Intelligence network?
by Tabaqui » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:13 am
A mean old man wrote:Amusingly, I was supposedly in charge of the UDL's Intel department at this time. As it turns out, Unibot was doing my job behind my back the entire time. He recruited me to that position, I suspect, to collect me as some sort of trophy; I willingly played into this when I accepted the job, mainly out of curiosity and boredom. After a few weeks of trying (unsuccessfully) to find agents within the UDL's dysfunctional ranks, I decided I would simply continue Eluvatar's work ... If nothing else, my brief stint as the UDL's Head of Intel allowed me to witness the hilarious shambles that UDL Command was at the time and could very well still be. ... [T]he sly "cosmopolitan" ... should not have been allowed influence in or access to the government he betrayed, as are a number of UDL meddlers who have negatively influenced regions such as TSP and TNP to forward their underhanded agenda.
by Todd McCloud » Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:05 pm
Do you realize this repeals the Defender Act?
It might repeal the law but it doesn't repeal the idea. The very first thing this amendment says is this:Section 11) The East Pacific shall be defender.
Again with the defender rhetoric. I don't want a law that tells me what our region must be. That's one of my biggest gripes with the Defender Act, which states that " The East Pacific affirms its identity as a "defender region."
I'll be frank. I don't want us to call ourselves a defender region. I don't want us to call ourselves a raider region. I don't want either scenario written in our laws. Because the moment we do that, we alienate anyone who is not a defender.
Since we are a "defender region", for example, would not someone who agrees with a raider ideal be considered an enemy of the state? After all, their philosophies are rather different and, if I read one of the subsections of Article F:Section 2) Each nation shall have the power to make such alliances as it sees fit, so long as these alliances do not act against the East Pacific, nor violate this Concordat.
So, if it's written into law that we're a defender region, wouldn't anyone who has an alliance with a raider region or, perhaps, a non-defender-friendly region, be in violation of this point? So in effect, if we get a crooked fellow into the courts, they could pick-and-choose whoever they want to not be a citizen because they're a raider and raiders are enemies of the state.
I'm not going to honor that stipulation. I couldn't care less if a citizen is a defender, raider, or some guy who argues about a flying spaghetti monster on NSG. It's this quality alone that makes me tempted just to strike the Defender Act null and void because it seems to contradict Article F. TEP was never, never founded on those principles. Loop's a former raider. Pack is a former raider. I'm a former raider. Many of the drafters and guys who worked countless nights in the TEP Chatzy room to form our Concordat were former raiders (or defender or whatever). And those are just a few examples. But even if there was only one, just one example of a citizen who's a former raider or current raider who feels less of a citizen or intimidated because of this resolution, it'd still be wrong. Because we should not attempt to alienate anyone here in this region. And that's exactly what this Act and this Amendment would accomplish.
And yet, this is just one example. I've provided many arguments as to why this Act is destructive and detrimental to all members in TEP society. It'd be the same way if I noticed we had some raiders here and posted a raider act, identifying us as a raider organization. Do you think defenders would feel welcome in a "raider region"? Nope. Then why are former and current raiders supposed to buck up and deal with it?
So yeah. That's why I'm against anything that would label us as a raider, defender, or whatever region. It automatically tells anyone who doesn't fit that ideal, intended or not, that they don't belong here. And I find it downright insulting that a guy who spent five years pouring his efforts into a region to suddenly feel not welcome in it. Not trying to toot my own horn here - the same would go for any citizen, committed or not, been a member for five years or five days, been extensively in the government or just posts at his or her leisure. It's wrong.
by Unibot III » Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:26 pm
Tabaqui wrote:Bachtendekuppen wrote:It was a very brief stint, and I recall him saying he didn't actually do anything.
He was, he held the position under false pretenses in the early part of 2013. While he criticized Unibot for not training him in his position and accused Unibot of placing him there for propaganda purposes, AMOM not only did zero work in UDL, he assessed and denigrated their intelligence capabilities and was unable to steal anything of value because it had been removed from his access before he was given the position. This is not news, AMOM told us about it in The Foreign FarceA mean old man wrote:Amusingly, I was supposedly in charge of the UDL's Intel department at this time. As it turns out, Unibot was doing my job behind my back the entire time. He recruited me to that position, I suspect, to collect me as some sort of trophy; I willingly played into this when I accepted the job, mainly out of curiosity and boredom. After a few weeks of trying (unsuccessfully) to find agents within the UDL's dysfunctional ranks, I decided I would simply continue Eluvatar's work ... If nothing else, my brief stint as the UDL's Head of Intel allowed me to witness the hilarious shambles that UDL Command was at the time and could very well still be. ... [T]he sly "cosmopolitan" ... should not have been allowed influence in or access to the government he betrayed, as are a number of UDL meddlers who have negatively influenced regions such as TSP and TNP to forward their underhanded agenda.
My retort would be, if you want to undermine Defenderdom, send your own operatives, don't undermine TEP in the process.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Common-Sense Politics » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:12 pm
by North East Somerset » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:19 pm
And yet, this is just one example. I've provided many arguments as to why this Act is destructive and detrimental to all members in TEP society. It'd be the same way if I noticed we had some raiders here and posted a raider act, identifying us as a raider organization. Do you think defenders would feel welcome in a "raider region"? Nope. Then why are former and current raiders supposed to buck up and deal with it?
So yeah. That's why I'm against anything that would label us as a raider, defender, or whatever region. It automatically tells anyone who doesn't fit that ideal, intended or not, that they don't belong here. And I find it downright insulting that a guy who spent five years pouring his efforts into a region to suddenly feel not welcome in it. Not trying to toot my own horn here - the same would go for any citizen, committed or not, been a member for five years or five days, been extensively in the government or just posts at his or her leisure. It's wrong.
by Hobbesistan » Thu Feb 20, 2014 5:08 pm
by Todd McCloud » Thu Feb 20, 2014 5:33 pm
North East Somerset wrote:But you saying "it's wrong" doesn't mean anything unless it's backed up by some action.
by PrussianEmpire » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:43 pm
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—
by Applebania » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:47 pm
by Todd McCloud » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:48 pm
by PrussianEmpire » Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:02 pm
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—
by Todd McCloud » Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:49 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement