Nullarni wrote:Empty? Seriously? There were 11 nations in the region just prior to Nazi Europe moving in. Just FYI.
Explain why UDL did not endorse one of those 11 nations.
Advertisement
by Galiantus » Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:47 pm
Nullarni wrote:Empty? Seriously? There were 11 nations in the region just prior to Nazi Europe moving in. Just FYI.
Benjamin Franklin wrote:"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch."
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Nullarni » Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:55 pm
by Galiantus » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:02 pm
Nullarni wrote:The only WA member prior to the invasion, was now endorsing the raiders.
Dissect and twist the situation all you like. The UDL made a good call on this one. Its as simple as that. My only complaint was that we used so many defenders on such a small target... but that has to do with technique, not ideology.
Edit: Nice add on to your sig. It makes me smile.
Benjamin Franklin wrote:"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch."
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Nullarni » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:06 pm
Galiantus wrote:
Edit: Thanks. Does it make you smile because of the idiology, or because of the plagerism?
by Galiantus » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:09 pm
Nullarni wrote:Galiantus wrote:
Edit: Thanks. Does it make you smile because of the idiology, or because of the plagerism?
Both. I was a staunch NatSov'er in the WA until I just couldn't stand to be a part of that organization anymore. I don't remember which resolution finally did it for me, but it was a last in a whole string of stomach-wrenchingly bad ones.
Benjamin Franklin wrote:"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch."
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Nullarni » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:12 pm
Galiantus wrote:Do you mean "IntFed" right there?
by Luna Amore » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:25 pm
Nullarni wrote:The only WA member prior to the invasion, was now endorsing the raiders.
Dissect and twist the situation all you like. The UDL made a good call on this one. Its as simple as that. My only complaint was that we used so many defenders on such a small target... but that has to do with technique, not ideology.
by Belschaft » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:35 pm
by Sichuan Pepper » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:02 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
by Belschaft » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:05 pm
by Luna Amore » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:09 pm
Sichuan Pepper wrote:The founder is not long CTE ......was he Mod deleted? He was active 9 days ago
Blood Tithe wrote:Reploid Productions to Priwert II: You were deleted for serial spamming another region using multiple puppets. As a result, the puppet nations and your main one were deleted. Making threats will do absolutely nothing to get your deleted nation back. Indeed, such antics are more likely to cost you further nations.
by Sichuan Pepper » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:21 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
by Belschaft » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:30 pm
by Sichuan Pepper » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:32 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
by Blood Tithe » Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:03 pm
Nullarni wrote:Here are the facts:
* We see the Blood Tithe take the delegate position in a raider fashion. (In fact, defenders jumped in to try and stop the alleged invasion.)
The only casualty I see is the defender that got stuck with the delegate position. He is new to the game, and he had to put up with the chiding and threats from the raiders involved. After that, I am not sure he will be so quick to help on either side of the game. Great job killing a newb's enthusiasm.
My only complaint was that we used so many defenders on such a small target... but that has to do with technique, not ideology.
by Unibot II » Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:09 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Blood Tithe » Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:53 pm
Unibot II wrote:Our administration's position is since we were contacted about this raid from an anonymous tipster (who very well could have been a Nazi Europe puppet), The UDL was led into a propaganda trap from a region working in conjunction with Nazi Europe or, possibly even just a puppet dump for Nazi Europe. Nonetheless, through Nazi Europe's exercise they learnt the hard way that they were militarily not a match for The United Defenders League.
- Unibot
by Rupture Farms co » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:44 pm
by Nullarni » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:33 pm
Rupture Farms co wrote:I ordered raid and I can promise you that Crato definetly was not my man.
by Drop Your Pants » Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:06 pm
Wait- So now you guys admit to it being a raid... That means that the UDL was in the right on this one.
Blood Tithe wrote:Nazi Europe invaded the region with the support of the only native in the region, which greatly diminishes any notion of malevolence, yeah?
by Altaggannah » Fri Jul 06, 2012 7:58 am
by Severisen » Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:28 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Chipoli, Jefferson-stan
Advertisement