Advertisement
by Grays Harbor » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:27 pm
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:28 pm
Krioval wrote:Beldonia wrote:I didn't mean that you guys actually forgot. It's just that you're talking a lot of shit about it now, but it was originally passed.
Uh...some of us voted against it when it came up to vote. We vigorously argued against it in the debate. However, it is possible that many national delegations were unable to participate in the debate and essentially wondered "what's the harm?" - and then voted for USTA. Well, I figured that I could demonstrate "the harm" in this repeal effort and attempt to convince some of the yes-voting nations to reconsider their stance. It's not as if the Imperial Chiefdom originally supported the USTA, after all.
Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval
by Krioval » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:30 pm
Beldonia wrote:There's no "harm". According to you, it's just needless, but not harmful.
by Grays Harbor » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:32 pm
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:34 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Needless, pointless and harmful are all valid reasons to attempt a repeal. Can you explain why keeping an unnecessary resolution 'on the books' is a good idea? We would think that "needless" is a very valid reason for repeal. Why must something which is not needed also be considered "harmful" in order for it to be considered for repeal?
by Mousebumples » Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:00 pm
Beldonia wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:Needless, pointless and harmful are all valid reasons to attempt a repeal. Can you explain why keeping an unnecessary resolution 'on the books' is a good idea? We would think that "needless" is a very valid reason for repeal. Why must something which is not needed also be considered "harmful" in order for it to be considered for repeal?
I don't think it's needless.
by Embolalia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:16 pm
Ah, but it is harmful. At the very least, it costs money. We have to pay the gnomes in the WATB and we have to maintain the clock itself. That costs money. The WA doesn't have infinite money to throw around at worthless shit. Depending on how you interpret the General Fund, it's running on manditory contributions from its members, which means my country's taxpayers, and yours, are paying their hard earned money to this crap. Or, limited voluntary funding given to the WA, which must be terribly difficult to raise, is being squandered on an unneeded clock that doesn't even make practical sense.Beldonia wrote:There's no "harm". According to you, it's just needless, but not harmful.
/ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|
by Schnubert » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:33 pm
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:47 pm
Schnubert wrote:Anyone want to repeal "Convention on Wartime Deceased"?
I find it needless and stupid, for dead people are actually just collections of material that resembles a human.
As for the Universal Time Act, I don't understand why people hate it.
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:58 pm
Rozonia wrote:Rozonia has managed its 7 timezones itself for thousands of years, and we certainly don't need a WA resolution for this. We support this repeal!
by Mousebumples » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:28 pm
Schnubert wrote:Anyone want to repeal "Convention on Wartime Deceased"?
I find it needless and stupid, for dead people are actually just collections of material that resembles a human.
As for the Universal Time Act, I don't understand why people hate it.
by Krioval » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:17 pm
Schnubert wrote:Anyone want to repeal "Convention on Wartime Deceased"?
I find it needless and stupid, for dead people are actually just collections of material that resembles a human.
As for the Universal Time Act, I don't understand why people hate it.
Beldonia wrote:I can't write for my life, but I agree with the sentiment.
Yeah, me neither.
by Krioval » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:18 pm
Rozonia wrote:Rozonia has managed its 7 timezones itself for thousands of years, and we certainly don't need a WA resolution for this. We support this repeal!
Thatius wrote:I voted for this resolution, as I voted against the Act in the first place. Didn't think it was necessary as Thatius has two time zones, and does not deal much in foreign affairs.
by Burninati0n » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:34 pm
by Krioval » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:43 pm
BURNINATI0N wrote:We fail to see how some fail to see the benefit of this resolution on international trade. Especially considering the difficulties with measuring time when travel between planets is concerned.
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:45 pm
Krioval wrote:BURNINATI0N wrote:We fail to see how some fail to see the benefit of this resolution on international trade. Especially considering the difficulties with measuring time when travel between planets is concerned.
Because interstellar nations have such problems harmonizing different time scales? That's Your Excellency's argument? The WA isn't doing anything that those nations weren't already doing, and the WA's system is almost certainly less efficient than one worked out by those nations feeling the need for such a system. There is no benefit to technologically advanced nations.
Since measuring atomic vibrations is beyond other nations, USTA leaves technologically limited nations out in the cold as well. As for the rest, I sincerely doubt that trade has suddenly improved now that an arbitrary line has been drawn on maps, and that it is half past ten there.
Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval
by Mousebumples » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Beldonia wrote:Meh. It pretty much unifies the world when it comes to time. That's kinda cool.
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:59 pm
Mousebumples wrote:Beldonia wrote:Meh. It pretty much unifies the world when it comes to time. That's kinda cool.
"Meh." ?
"That's pretty cool." ?
Good to know you're so very resolved and determined to make sure that your reasons for supporting the resolution in question are strong and clearly detailed.
As others have said, there's no reason to leave laws on the books simply because they don't hurt anything. If anything, such resolutions hurt my national tax rate and my national economy. My nation's people like having more money in their pocket.
We've survived for ... *checks calendar and, ironically enough, a clock* ... 8 years, 3 months, 16 days, 11 hours, and 50 minutes without having a unified time system between all WA member nations. I see no reason why such a system is suddenly required at this late date in order for our member nations to function effectively in an international world - one, mind you, in which the non-WA member nations outnumber us.
by Grays Harbor » Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:09 pm
Mousebumples wrote:Beldonia wrote:Meh. It pretty much unifies the world when it comes to time. That's kinda cool.
"Meh." ?
"That's pretty cool." ?
Good to know you're so very resolved and determined to make sure that your reasons for supporting the resolution in question are strong and clearly detailed.
As others have said, there's no reason to leave laws on the books simply because they don't hurt anything. If anything, such resolutions hurt my national tax rate and my national economy. My nation's people like having more money in their pocket.
We've survived for ... *checks calendar and, ironically enough, a clock* ... 8 years, 3 months, 16 days, 11 hours, and 50 minutes without having a unified time system between all WA member nations. I see no reason why such a system is suddenly required at this late date in order for our member nations to function effectively in an international world - one, mind you, in which the non-WA member nations outnumber us.
by Beldonia » Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:12 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Mousebumples wrote:"Meh." ?
"That's pretty cool." ?
Good to know you're so very resolved and determined to make sure that your reasons for supporting the resolution in question are strong and clearly detailed.
As others have said, there's no reason to leave laws on the books simply because they don't hurt anything. If anything, such resolutions hurt my national tax rate and my national economy. My nation's people like having more money in their pocket.
We've survived for ... *checks calendar and, ironically enough, a clock* ... 8 years, 3 months, 16 days, 11 hours, and 50 minutes without having a unified time system between all WA member nations. I see no reason why such a system is suddenly required at this late date in order for our member nations to function effectively in an international world - one, mind you, in which the non-WA member nations outnumber us.
We believe that the representative from Beldonia may have broken translation buffers as he does not appear to understand the words coming from any of our mouths.
Hey, Beldonian, "Because its cool" is not sufficient reason to keep a bit of useless fluff on the books. It is not even insufficient reason. In fact, it barely qualifies as a moderately humourous interlude.
by Krioval » Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:14 pm
Beldonia wrote:The reason is that it's kinda cool.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement