Silly and/or Illegal GA Proposals. zOMG!

[Grays Harbor]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: tamrisky_1433203191

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Tamrisky

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The Indigenous people don't deserve any better than the non-Indigenous.

Just because they were here first doesn't mean that they should be treated better, get better health care or get better anything.

They can believe in there culture but we own there land now.
They want it back? they should stop only using the support of the government and try getting a job and buy the land just like every other person.

They can have health care just they have to pay the same as we do.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

And again. No "repeals" clause.
This could be taken as Grossly Offensive if you look at it a certain way.

I find it somewhat amusing that the author of the resolution trying to be repealed approved it.

[Imperium Anglorum]

Great big steaming pile of six illegal proposals headed your way.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: italylander_1433182908

Conserve and preserve

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity

Area of Effect: Cultural Heritage

Proposed by: Italylander

Description: With this resolution we intend to increase the preservation of cultural heritage through two items:
1) Governments are allowed to declare anything a cultural patrimony
2) Who will damage these cultural heritages will pay a fine.

Approvals: 3 (Italylander, Wintariu, Centrika)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 92 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Doesn't show any parameters whatsoever on this, possibly making it BS.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: united_kanter_1433181105

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: United Kanter

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Tris cannot happen! My people have begun to be missing! I have ordered military action on the things. Regardless os the laws.

Approvals: 4 (Demoitia, Wintariu, Cresenthia, Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 91 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Pure NatSov and lacks a "Repeals" clause.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: zapos_1433193157

Ban on Non Perscribed Drugs

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use

Decision: Outlaw

Proposed by: Zapos

Description: Zappa seeks to bring the issue of drugs to the attention of the WA. Zapos believes that we should ban non perscribed drugs other than tobacco because:
1: Drugs cause unusual and sometimes aggressive behaviour
2: Drugs are dangerous and responsible for many deaths
3: Drugs can divide families
4: Drugs can cause agresive behaviour which can cause harm to otherd
5: Drugs are expensive and bring many addicts into poverty
6: All Drugs are addictive although power of the addiction varies

I hope the WA will see the wisdom of our proposal.

Approvals: 1 (Italylander)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Not from WA's perspective, bumpersticker.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: swatar_1433196172

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Swatar

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The Dictatorship of Swatar invites all respected member of the World Assembly to re-evaluate this matter.

The resolution as it stands makes not difference between an evolved and socially ready indigenous and a "wild" indigenous.

Some Nations might have a considerable number of indigenous peoples, and providing for them would prove an effort that could weaken the economy and social structure, not to mention the culture, of said nation.

The current resolution "Prohibits member nations from forcibly assimilating indigenous peoples, or eradicating, reducing, or limiting their culture, with exceptions provided in cases in which existing international law prohibits specific practices of the indigenous peoples", with no discrimination over the cultural and social level.

The part where the current resolution states "[...]unless a legitimate governmental need requires such land and no reasonable alternative exists[...]" is extremely vague and subject to interpretation which would lead to internal debate a possible international issues.

Again, the current resolution also states "in which case the indigenous peoples in the area affected shall be given fair compensation and adequate time to prepare for their relocation to reasonably close and similar lands" - not only we are not assured that the indigenous population would be willing to accept said relocation under any term, but they might escalate the issue to violence, involving a large international crisis and divergence in opinions between the members of this organization.

I therefore implore all respectable members of the World Assembly to repeal this resolution in this form and seek, if need be, to submit a new and much better designed one.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Not from WA's perspective.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: al_curtisany_1433196482

Repeal "The Prisoners of War Accord"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#18

Proposed by: Al Curtisany

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #18: The Prisoners of War Accord (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: I wish there was an amendment option, but unfortunately not so. What must be considered is that if there is no "terror" in the concept of Prisoners of War, then why would troops try as hard to battle? Much less, why would there bother to be any defense at all? I agree that civilians should be treated well as described above, (really I think civilian PoW should be outlawed period). But as a soldier, you need motivation. You need a reason to go on. When you sign up to enlist in the military, you already know you might die. Which leads me to my next argument; whose to say that now since PoW accords are now more expensive and resource consuming, that militaries won't start operating under "the black flag", or take no prisoners and kill everyone. Fatalities would sky rocket! Has nobody considered this? Perhaps it's time. i officially propose to repel this Accord.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Not from WA's perspective, no "repeals" clause.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: randiama_1433198408

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Randiama

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This infringes on private property laws of my nation.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

One-liner without an active clause.

Anybody keeping count on repeal attempts for Rights of Indigenous Peoples? I've seen six so far, of which one is legal.

If any of these proposals are written by delegates, send them my way. Perhaps they can contribute to the cause.

[Kaboomlandia]

Great big steaming pile of six illegal proposals headed your way.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: italylander_1433182908

Conserve and preserve

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity

Area of Effect: Cultural Heritage

Proposed by: Italylander

Description: With this resolution we intend to increase the preservation of cultural heritage through two items:
1) Governments are allowed to declare anything a cultural patrimony
2) Who will damage these cultural heritages will pay a fine.

Approvals: 3 (Italylander, Wintariu, Centrika)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 92 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Doesn't show any parameters whatsoever on this, possibly making it BS.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: united_kanter_1433181105

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: United Kanter

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Tris cannot happen! My people have begun to be missing! I have ordered military action on the things. Regardless os the laws.

Approvals: 4 (Demoitia, Wintariu, Cresenthia, Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 91 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Pure NatSov and lacks a "Repeals" clause.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: zapos_1433193157

Ban on Non Perscribed Drugs

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use

Decision: Outlaw

Proposed by: Zapos

Description: Zappa seeks to bring the issue of drugs to the attention of the WA. Zapos believes that we should ban non perscribed drugs other than tobacco because:
1: Drugs cause unusual and sometimes aggressive behaviour
2: Drugs are dangerous and responsible for many deaths
3: Drugs can divide families
4: Drugs can cause agresive behaviour which can cause harm to otherd
5: Drugs are expensive and bring many addicts into poverty
6: All Drugs are addictive although power of the addiction varies

I hope the WA will see the wisdom of our proposal.

Approvals: 1 (Italylander)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Not from WA's perspective, bumpersticker.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: swatar_1433196172

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Swatar

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The Dictatorship of Swatar invites all respected member of the World Assembly to re-evaluate this matter.

The resolution as it stands makes not difference between an evolved and socially ready indigenous and a "wild" indigenous.

Some Nations might have a considerable number of indigenous peoples, and providing for them would prove an effort that could weaken the economy and social structure, not to mention the culture, of said nation.

The current resolution "Prohibits member nations from forcibly assimilating indigenous peoples, or eradicating, reducing, or limiting their culture, with exceptions provided in cases in which existing international law prohibits specific practices of the indigenous peoples", with no discrimination over the cultural and social level.

The part where the current resolution states "[...]unless a legitimate governmental need requires such land and no reasonable alternative exists[...]" is extremely vague and subject to interpretation which would lead to internal debate a possible international issues.

Again, the current resolution also states "in which case the indigenous peoples in the area affected shall be given fair compensation and adequate time to prepare for their relocation to reasonably close and similar lands" - not only we are not assured that the indigenous population would be willing to accept said relocation under any term, but they might escalate the issue to violence, involving a large international crisis and divergence in opinions between the members of this organization.

I therefore implore all respectable members of the World Assembly to repeal this resolution in this form and seek, if need be, to submit a new and much better designed one.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Not from WA's perspective.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: al_curtisany_1433196482

Repeal "The Prisoners of War Accord"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#18

Proposed by: Al Curtisany

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #18: The Prisoners of War Accord (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: I wish there was an amendment option, but unfortunately not so. What must be considered is that if there is no "terror" in the concept of Prisoners of War, then why would troops try as hard to battle? Much less, why would there bother to be any defense at all? I agree that civilians should be treated well as described above, (really I think civilian PoW should be outlawed period). But as a soldier, you need motivation. You need a reason to go on. When you sign up to enlist in the military, you already know you might die. Which leads me to my next argument; whose to say that now since PoW accords are now more expensive and resource consuming, that militaries won't start operating under "the black flag", or take no prisoners and kill everyone. Fatalities would sky rocket! Has nobody considered this? Perhaps it's time. i officially propose to repel this Accord.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Not from WA's perspective, no "repeals" clause.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: randiama_1433198408

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Randiama

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This infringes on private property laws of my nation.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

One-liner without an active clause.

Anybody keeping count on repeal attempts for Rights of Indigenous Peoples? I've seen six so far, of which one is legal.

If any of these proposals are written by delegates, send them my way. Perhaps they can contribute to the cause.

They all got yanked.

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: the_liberal_nation_of_rapidash_1433205142

The River Queen Gambling Act

A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.


Category: Gambling

Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize

Proposed by: The Liberal Nation of Rapidash

Description: This law, legalizes all forms of gambling on all bodies of water whether that be lakes, oceans, rivers, or seas.

This law does however restrict the type of structure that is on the body of water for instance:

The structure must be self-propelled and classified as a boat
The structure can not be longer than 200 yards and cannot wider than 100 yards
Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

For lack of a better term...

So, my leader can go play cards on his motorboat even if the rest of the country has banned gambling?

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: jair_kross_1433212506

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Jair Kross

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Every country should have the right to put out whoever they wa not t at all times

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

Number nine, incoherent one-liner.

[The Candy Of Bottles]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: statevia_1433202227

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: Statevia

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Rights of indigenous peoples mandates that countries allow all indigenous cultural practices that are frankly barbaric legal throughout the world. These practices can include, the abuse of children, abuse of women and the ritual use of drugs. These practices are not acceptable in the modern world. That is why this resolution must be repealed.

Approvals: 2 (Vancouvia, Cresenthia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 93 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

Honestly not sure if that last sentence counts as a repeal clause or not... Oops. Repeat.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: the_capitalist_republic_of_ritosa_1433217133

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: The Capitalist Republic of Ritosa

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: I agree with the majority of this. However I disagree with the access to healthcare, education, emplyment, and representation for indigenous peoples.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

First Person, no Repeal Clause.

[Nurkama]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: italylander_1433083702

Controls for use guns

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control

Decision: Tighten

Proposed by: Italylander

Description: There are innocent people who are killed by mentally unstable people. So you better step in and you can do it by following this proposal:
1) The gun store is NOT allowed to sell weapons to anyone
2) The medical practitioner must issue a permit to anyone who wants to own a weapon
3) This permit must be performed in front of 'gunsmith, who will release the weapon
4) If the gunsmith sells the same weapon without a permit may be punished by law

Approvals: 9 (Italylander, Terrocka, Mattymanland, HYDRA-Russian Empire, Samogitias, Czkauvek, Unitarian land, NovaTora, Wintariu)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 86 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 1 day 11 hours

[Imperium Anglorum]

Proposal of the Year

Lol we need more noscopers

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Altis-Stratis

Description: we need more dank mlg noscopers henceforth we should increse global military budgets by 420%

Approvals: 1 (Altis-Stratis)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 10 hours

[Jean Pierre Trudeau]

Proposal of the Year

Lol we need more noscopers

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Altis-Stratis

Description: we need more dank mlg noscopers henceforth we should increse global military budgets by 420%

Approvals: 1 (Altis-Stratis)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 10 hours

Somehow I don't think the author thought this one through. I dearly hope the form letter they receive points them to the rules, and doesn't just tell them it is illegal or they may make the same mistake yet again.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: italylander_1433083702

Controls for use guns

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control

Decision: Tighten

Proposed by: Italylander

Description: There are innocent people who are killed by mentally unstable people. So you better step in and you can do it by following this proposal:
1) The gun store is NOT allowed to sell weapons to anyone
2) The medical practitioner must issue a permit to anyone who wants to own a weapon
3) This permit must be performed in front of 'gunsmith, who will release the weapon
4) If the gunsmith sells the same weapon without a permit may be punished by law

Approvals: 9 (Italylander, Terrocka, Mattymanland, HYDRA-Russian Empire, Samogitias, Czkauvek, Unitarian land, NovaTora, Wintariu)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 86 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 1 day 11 hours

Your a couple days late and a few dollars short friend. Usually is is considered good form to actually tell us why you believe the proposal is is in violation of the rules. Simply posting it here, as has been done a couple of times before you does nothing to help the cause.

[The Two Jerseys]

Somehow I don't think the author thought this one through. I dearly hope the form letter they receive points them to the rules, and doesn't just tell them it is illegal or they may make the same mistake yet again.

Given the 420 reference, I'm afraid that they did think it through...

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: newspartan_1433251510

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: NewSpartan

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: All citizens are equal under the law!
Recognize that there are indigenous peoples is a form of discrimination!
For all intents and purposes we are saying that they are different from other citizens and must have special laws and rights!
We do not think that this is fair to the remaining citizens.
As such we ask that this resolution law be annulled and that all citizens be equal and have the same rights and duties before the state!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

#11.
No "repeals" clause, legislates in a repeal, manages to duplicate CoCR in that legislation, and isn't from the WA's perspective.

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: imerina_1433265664

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: IMERINA

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Recoginizing the indigenous people not as some priviledged part of the population but as citizens who might be sharing the same rights as any citizen of a nation ,but also should have the same responsibilities toward their country.

Aknowledging that a nation's unity is not ensured by promoting differences among its people but only by sharing a common culture ,language and way of life regardless of origin,religion or sexual orientation.

Concerned that enforcing equality by any kind of positive discrimination will not only alienate indigenous people as a minority but will also create frustration amongst the majority of the non indigenous people.

Encourages member nations to create oppportunities for everyone instead of assisting the weakest,because poverty maintained by social welfare will only lead to more maintained poverty.

Approvals: 2 (Cresenthia, Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 93 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 10 hours

#12.
No "repeals" clause.

[Frisbeeteria]

I dearly hope the form letter they receive points them to the rules,

I don't suppose we've posted the boilerplate letter recently. It reads:

You submitted a Proposal that was unfortunately invalid. If you would like to submit another proposal, please familiarize yourself with the guidelines in the Proposal Rules forum thread. We highly recommend that you post a draft to the General Assembly Forum first to be checked before submitting it to the game! The people there are very helpful at polishing drafts so they meet the guidelines. [Additional sentence from the deleting mod listing reasons.]

[Grays Harbor]

Right of Free movement

A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: Furtherment of Democracy

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Demeterium

Description: A resoloution to give citizens of a world assembly member nation the right to live in another nation that is part of the world assembly.

This would be done by a world assembly passport for all citizens born in an world assembly country or has lived in a world assembly country for 7 years.

In order to exercise the right to free movement. You must comply with the following.

Have an world assembly passport
Be employed or must look for employment within one year of exercising the right
Be a student
Be self sufficient or retired

If at least one member of your close family may exercise the right of free movement then all members of the close family may move with him. To be close family you must be the following relations

A registered partner
Offspring under the age of 21

If you are employed and then become redundant or are released then you must find a job within the next 2 years.

Failure to comply with any of the five rules of free movement or the above will result in you and your close family being deported.

The WA =/= EU. Not seeing how this is "Furtherment of Democracy" either.

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: remodio_1433281864

Ban All Drugs

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use

Decision: Outlaw

Proposed by: Remodio

Description: Drugs can decrease a population from overdose, as well as abuse from drug users. If we ban drugs, lives will be saved. Think of the children, getting beat by their father whilst he's high, then the child doing drugs, and doing the same thing, if he even lives!

Then work... If we allowed drugs, economy's would be basket cases due to the fact most men would be more worried about their drugs! And freedom... its not freedom! Drugs control their lives! Rather have no drugs, and true freedom.

Please consider!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

Gahhhh...

[Grays Harbor]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: remodio_1433281864

Ban All Drugs

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use

Decision: Outlaw

Proposed by: Remodio

Description: Drugs can decrease a population from overdose, as well as abuse from drug users. If we ban drugs, lives will be saved. Think of the children, getting beat by their father whilst he's high, then the child doing drugs, and doing the same thing, if he even lives!

Then work... If we allowed drugs, economy's would be basket cases due to the fact most men would be more worried about their drugs! And freedom... its not freedom! Drugs control their lives! Rather have no drugs, and true freedom.

Please consider!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

Gahhhh...

Rather bloggy, and little more than an appeal to emotion. It also, by its "Ban All Drugs" statement would succeed in banning not only the targeted recreational drugs but all medicinal drugs as well as it doesn't specify, only says all drugs. Poorly written crap.

[Grays Harbor]

World Assembly Becoming Guide

A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: Furtherment of Democracy

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Illtopilosia

Description: Understanding that all World Assembly nations must abide by the same regulation.

Acknowledging that these regulations make the World a safer, and more desirable place.

Resulting, however, in a overly similar, and alike nations, therefore restricting trade.

Also Oppresses a nation's political freedom and choices.

Which makes it Acceptable to make the World Assembly a guideline

DeFuq? Paging M. DeFuq.

Game Mechanics, I would surmise, at the very least.

[Grays Harbor]

Legalizing Drug use

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use

Decision: Legalize

Proposed by: Sirodia

Description: The ban of drugs in many nations is undermining people's right to be reckless. While drugs are a stupid choice, banning them not only takes away civil rights, but it increases crime.
If drugs are illegal, then criminals can sell them illegally. If drugs are legal, then that gives crime less of a foothold in our world.
Also, we have to trust our citizens to make the right choice. Banning drugs does not prevent drug use. Maybe if we gave our citizens the chance to prove that they are responsible, drug use would go down.

That's why the world assembly should legalize drugs internationally.

Bloggy

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: demeterium_1433370197

Party stability act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Demeterium

Description: The political stability act Recognises the need for restrictions on the political freedoms of political candidates standing for election.

Article 1
1. Article 1 states that donations from outside sources such as private buissiness are banned and parties may only collect donations through public donation skeems.
2. Parties may not recieve a loan from the nations bank.
3. Candidates may not donate money from their own salary to the party.

Article 2
1. Acrticle 2 states that no party may broadcast on
a. television.
b. Radio.
c. Over the internet.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Well, this bans any campaigning or public service announcements from the government at all except for in-person.
I fail to see how this is an international issue.

[Grays Harbor]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: demeterium_1433370197

Party stability act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Demeterium

Description: The political stability act Recognises the need for restrictions on the political freedoms of political candidates standing for election.

Article 1
1. Article 1 states that donations from outside sources such as private buissiness are banned and parties may only collect donations through public donation skeems.
2. Parties may not recieve a loan from the nations bank.
3. Candidates may not donate money from their own salary to the party.

Article 2
1. Acrticle 2 states that no party may broadcast on
a. television.
b. Radio.
c. Over the internet.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Well, this bans any campaigning or public service announcements from the government at all except for in-person.
I fail to see how this is an international issue.

And I fail to see how it is anything other than naive bullshit.

[Jean Pierre Trudeau]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: demeterium_1433370197

Party stability act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Demeterium

Description: The political stability act Recognises the need for restrictions on the political freedoms of political candidates standing for election.

Article 1
1. Article 1 states that donations from outside sources such as private buissiness are banned and parties may only collect donations through public donation skeems.
2. Parties may not recieve a loan from the nations bank.
3. Candidates may not donate money from their own salary to the party.

Article 2
1. Acrticle 2 states that no party may broadcast on
a. television.
b. Radio.
c. Over the internet.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Well, this bans any campaigning or public service announcements from the government at all except for in-person.
I fail to see how this is an international issue.

Does that make it illegal? If not then why is it in this thread? Not every proposal that lacks a drafting thread is illegal or even silly. You seem to be missing the whole point of this thread and simply post them here for you amusement. It really needs to stop.

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: demeterium_1433370197

Party stability act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Demeterium

Description: The political stability act Recognises the need for restrictions on the political freedoms of political candidates standing for election.

Article 1
1. Article 1 states that donations from outside sources such as private buissiness are banned and parties may only collect donations through public donation skeems.
2. Parties may not recieve a loan from the nations bank.
3. Candidates may not donate money from their own salary to the party.

Article 2
1. Acrticle 2 states that no party may broadcast on
a. television.
b. Radio.
c. Over the internet.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Well, this bans any campaigning or public service announcements from the government at all except for in-person.
I fail to see how this is an international issue.

Does that make it illegal? If not then why is it in this thread? Not every proposal that lacks a drafting thread is illegal or even silly. You seem to be missing the whole point of this thread and simply post them here for you amusement. It really needs to stop.

The Bloody Stupid rule is still in force, last I checked. This sets no parameters for anything, it just places a blanket ban on politicians from addressing the public any method other than in public.

[Grays Harbor]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: demeterium_1433370197

Party stability act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Demeterium

Description: The political stability act Recognises the need for restrictions on the political freedoms of political candidates standing for election.

Article 1
1. Article 1 states that donations from outside sources such as private buissiness are banned and parties may only collect donations through public donation skeems.
2. Parties may not recieve a loan from the nations bank.
3. Candidates may not donate money from their own salary to the party.

Article 2
1. Acrticle 2 states that no party may broadcast on
a. television.
b. Radio.
c. Over the internet.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours

Well, this bans any campaigning or public service announcements from the government at all except for in-person.
I fail to see how this is an international issue.

Does that make it illegal? If not then why is it in this thread? Not every proposal that lacks a drafting thread is illegal or even silly. You seem to be missing the whole point of this thread and simply post them here for you amusement. It really needs to stop.

Sorry, in my opinion it does indeed belong here.

[Grays Harbor]

The Forward Unto Dawn Act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: The Monroe Confederation

Description: THE FORWARD UNTO DAWN ACT

Act 1
_____
1.a- In an event where 2 countries that both have lower than 20 million people will be seen as a Skirmish. Wars fought with more than 20 million people will be seen as a War. In the event that a country outnumbers his/her opponent by at least 2 to 1, will be seen as a genocide.

1.b- In the event of a Skirmish, all nations within the General Assembly outside of the nations delegations will refrain from spreading their political influence to those nations.
In the event of a War, nations within the General Assembly will be allowed to give political support to ONE of the warring nations or stay neutral.
In the event of a Genocide, all nations must push for peace on both sides of the conflict.

1.c- If a country is proven to be spreading their influence in a Skirmish, all nations outside of the offenders delegation must stop all political talks with that country until the conflict is over or the embargo is called off.

2.a- The World Assembly is NOT responsible for helping in any sort of Militaristic fashion in a conflict. Political support can be used outside of the World Assembly to build support for one country or another.

Arbitrary numbers assigned, and appear to be referring to gameside stats. Arbitrary and nonsensical definitions of skirmish and genocide, with little regard paid to what a skirmish and what genocide actually are. May well be a strength violation as well.

[Kaboomlandia]

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: uncorruptable_1433381205

Repeal "Nuclear Security Convention"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#292

Proposed by: UnCorruptable

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #292: Nuclear Security Convention (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: World Assembly,

Until Nuclear Fusion Nuclear Power is as Polluting as Coal or Oil

Article 1

Restricting the publicized Devolpment of Nuclear Enegry will reduce The actual Devolpment

Article 2

Arguing for governments fund water or wind instead of Nucelar Power

Article 3

Requesting that governments destroy their nukes over time

Repealing Nuclear Security Convention

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

Legislates in a repeal.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: the_mercenary_refuge_of_outer_heaven_1433382428

Repeal "Rights of Indigenous Peoples"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#328

Proposed by: The Mercenary Refuge of Outer Heaven

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #328: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: We shouldn't be required to cater to the uncultured natives of our lands. Assimilation is key to success.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

#13.
No "repeals" clause, no argument.