Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:The Two Jerseys wrote:I'll leave that for the Mod Squad to rule on, but I'd say it definitely qualifies as bloody stupid, because, well, it is.
Just a quick note. The overuse of "Bloody Stupid" in this thread has been an issue before. Not that any of you guys are overusing it, but still:Ardchoille wrote:While "bloody stupid" is a fair description of many of the proposals in this thread, precise references to specific violations (strength, category, duplication, optionality, etc) are greatly appreciated. Not all mods are au fait with the Proposal Rules, and players' informed advice sometimes helps us make illegalities clearer to would-be proposal writers. "Bloody stupid", in its technical sense, is for proposals when that's the overwhelming reason they're illegal.
Its the "its bloody stupid because tautology" that's the real problem.