Advertisement
by Unibot » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:05 am
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Lowell Leber » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:08 am
by A mean old man » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:56 am
Anime Daisuke wrote:I was going to post a long reply, but on second thought, I don't think your trolling me here deserves a response.
amom wrote:Oh, isn't that cute. So you can trash talk me and anyone else as much as you like, but when I start to defend myself, I'm the big bad guy. Alright, play that card. I've said what I needed to say, and you've given me a response that, frankly, supports my claims.
Anime Daisuke wrote:As much as you like to think the world about yourself, this is not about you, A Mean Old Man. My posts did not mention you at all.
*Thread is locked and will be towed to Senate in 30 minutes, and unlocked*
by A mean old man » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:34 am
Sedgistan wrote:You're not really helping your case here AMON. Make this thread about Yelda again, and go and lobby some other delegates.
by Unibot » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:53 am
A mean old man wrote:Sedgistan wrote:You're not really helping your case here AMON. Make this thread about Yelda again, and go and lobby some other delegates.
Oh; pardon me, Sedge. I think I have a right to be angry about what I've witnessed over in the 10kI forums, and explain here as to why a delegate with one of the highest endocounts would support this resolution, but how they and their endorsers have been manipulated by a single person to do otherwise. So excuse me if I'm taking on a colleague of yours or a fellow defender spokesperson, but I think this is very, very relevant to what we're discussing.
...and as for lobbying other delegates, I sent out around 700 telegrams in the TG campaign for this while it was in proposal form with an argument that I spent days developing (and which was praised by more than a few who read through it), and have been sending telegrams around to numerous delegates since this came to vote. So don't you lecture me on lobbying delegates.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by New Rockport » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:06 am
A mean old man wrote:Grub wrote: Ananke, we have done nothing to this person, but this guy has been clearly against the 10000 Islands and against what we stand for. Why would you vote to commend him?
That one’s an absolute peach, Grub. “Against what we stand for.” How lame.Wordy wrote: I am voting against. It's not ok to continue to mock us. This just gives him leave to do as he wishes and continue. We do rise above it by not taking any action to against him. I wont commend him though.
When you have fun at the expense of others it is not ok.Mark the Shark wrote: Against , I agree with wordy and animeThe Mega Chicken of 3LiT3 wrote: If Yelda made fun of us once, I would probably vote for, but if Yelda made fun of us THREE times, I would have to vote AGAINST.
I think my evidence speaks for itself.
by A mean old man » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:15 am
Unibot wrote:No, Sedge is right, AD is a pretty honorable and respectful player, and this is all likely caused by a misunderstanding of events.. your attitude won't help your cause.
New Rockport wrote:OOC: I voted in favor of the original commendation of 10000 Islands and against its repeal. However, if the 10000 Islanders are so humorless as to take offense at Yelda's joke and so vindictive as to torpedo this commendation, then I'll probably reconsider my support for any possible future commendation of 10000 Islands.
by Krioval » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:22 am
Unibot wrote:A mean old man wrote:Sedgistan wrote:You're not really helping your case here AMON. Make this thread about Yelda again, and go and lobby some other delegates.
Oh; pardon me, Sedge. I think I have a right to be angry about what I've witnessed over in the 10kI forums, and explain here as to why a delegate with one of the highest endocounts would support this resolution, but how they and their endorsers have been manipulated by a single person to do otherwise. So excuse me if I'm taking on a colleague of yours or a fellow defender spokesperson, but I think this is very, very relevant to what we're discussing.
...and as for lobbying other delegates, I sent out around 700 telegrams in the TG campaign for this while it was in proposal form with an argument that I spent days developing (and which was praised by more than a few who read through it), and have been sending telegrams around to numerous delegates since this came to vote. So don't you lecture me on lobbying delegates.
No, Sedge is right, AD is a pretty honorable and respectful player, and this is all likely caused by a misunderstanding of events.. your attitude won't help your cause.
by Unibotian WA Mission » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:55 am
Krioval wrote:Unibot wrote:A mean old man wrote:Sedgistan wrote:You're not really helping your case here AMON. Make this thread about Yelda again, and go and lobby some other delegates.
Oh; pardon me, Sedge. I think I have a right to be angry about what I've witnessed over in the 10kI forums, and explain here as to why a delegate with one of the highest endocounts would support this resolution, but how they and their endorsers have been manipulated by a single person to do otherwise. So excuse me if I'm taking on a colleague of yours or a fellow defender spokesperson, but I think this is very, very relevant to what we're discussing.
...and as for lobbying other delegates, I sent out around 700 telegrams in the TG campaign for this while it was in proposal form with an argument that I spent days developing (and which was praised by more than a few who read through it), and have been sending telegrams around to numerous delegates since this came to vote. So don't you lecture me on lobbying delegates.
No, Sedge is right, AD is a pretty honorable and respectful player, and this is all likely caused by a misunderstanding of events.. your attitude won't help your cause.
Y'know, I was going to stay out of this, at least OOC, but I'm kinda with AMOM on this. Perhaps not to the same level of intensity, but still. A swing of 500 votes would make this favor passing again - remember to subtract from "against" and add to "for". And let's not underestimate the bandwagon effect; if the vote were to swing back dramatically, it might very well carry through. But that's not the primary issue here; I think that Ananke II's position representing 10KI's views is admirable, though I disagree with the result.
AD and some of the other posters on 10KI's site are perpetuating the idea that gameplay must be super-serious at all times, to the detriment of both the GP and RP communities. Defending these kinds of attitudes looks a lot like circling the wagons, especially when it's all the familiar faces making the same arguments - in this case, that because AD is a decent person, that he/she (I don't know AD's gender, I apologize for that) is entitled to not only cast aspersions on Yelda's character but to make those claims unchallenged. I think that what shows someone's character in glaring light is when that person (DA, here) uses personal animus to kill a humorous resolution and people support that because they support a particular cause (defending, here).
I don't necessarily agree with AMOM's tone. OK, I usually find myself disagreeing with his tone. But the points made are valid, especially the greater ones about the SC as an institution. I thought we were really on the right track, with the RP C&Cs balancing things out, and I liked the commendation of Imagey Nation as a way to explore another aspect of gameplay. I'd rather not see most of the SC's business being decided off of the primary forum, as I've said multiple times, and this incident just makes me all the more cautious about participating in the SC in the future.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote: Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Iron Felix » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:08 pm
by Kanaia » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:43 pm
A mean old man wrote:Ananke II wrote:He posted on our forum, because that's where we talk about WA resolutions and since his posts were directed at 10ki people I don't see any reason why he should post it here. His points were mostly of interest to our own players, so why'd he post it on the official forum?
Well, it concerns 250+ votes, hardly a small number, as those would turn this currently failing resolution around right now if they were placed "FOR."Edit: Btw. I doubt people's votes on this particular resolution has anything to do with who proposed it.
Oh, I'm sure it doesn't for most of the 10kI residents - though I'm sure more than a few of them get a bad vibe from seeing my name due to how it has been trashed over there.Ananke II wrote:*shrugs* If you're interested in our people's reason for voting against you can have a look through the thread at our regional forum.
I actually did try to register on the 10kI forums last night so that I could post in its thread, however the registration form didn't seem to like the name, "A mean old man." Suspicious.
I have changed it to AMOM just now and am registering.I personally am in favour of the resolution as such, but understand why some of my region mates might not want to vote for. In Nationstates people's actions often put them at odds with others.
Although they could just say "I don't like the person who wrote this" rather than "this person has done 10kI a load of wrong and doesn't deserve our support."Either way, my 250+ votes aren't the only reason this proposal is failing, so I don't really see why there's such focus on the 10ki votes. I'm pretty sure my endorsers came to their own conclusions about this proposal, but ranting about how their vote is all wrong probably isn't going to make them change their mind.
Well, it isn't just about the votes. I'm not happy with Anime Daisuke's underhanded way of trashing other peoples' reputations among the 10kI voters in such inaccurate ways and just thinking that he can get away with it without a fight. My rant is more about Anime Daisuke than about the 10kI voters. The bottom piece is directed more at the WA as a whole. I’m not sure whether I’m changing anyone’s mind, however I’m speaking my opinions, as I always do.
...and as for your endorsers "coming to their own conclusions," don't tell me you can ignore this:Ant Infinitum wrote: Oh, that was him? Heh... well, I would like to encourage more poetic resolutions, but I guess there'll have to be another way.
Vote retracted.Grub wrote: Ananke, we have done nothing to this person, but this guy has been clearly against the 10000 Islands and against what we stand for. Why would you vote to commend him?
That one’s an absolute peach, Grub. “Against what we stand for.” How lame.Wordy wrote: I am voting against. It's not ok to continue to mock us. This just gives him leave to do as he wishes and continue. We do rise above it by not taking any action to against him. I wont commend him though.
When you have fun at the expense of others it is not ok.Mark the Shark wrote: Against , I agree with wordy and animeThe Mega Chicken of 3LiT3 wrote: If Yelda made fun of us once, I would probably vote for, but if Yelda made fun of us THREE times, I would have to vote AGAINST.
I think my evidence speaks for itself.
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by Yelda » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:25 pm
Gigantic butt wrote:Yelda sucks! and should be destroyed!
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:27 pm
Iron Felix wrote:Felix speaks.
Felix: Greetings comrade TV stars and cartoon heroes. I am Felix the Horse from the nation of...um...Horsey Land. I am come here to take part with you in this blockbuster TV reality phenomenon fad. Say, how about that People's Democratic Republic of....erm....that Yelda person...as you say? He's a very bad egg, eh? I bet he isn't a TV cartoon fan like all of us.
Felix scans the audience, waiting for a reaction.
by A mean old man » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:37 pm
Kanaia wrote:I don't believe this has anything to do with you, A Mean Old Man, being the one to propose it.
You will also find there were some of us who were against it before AD posted on the forum, I'm fairly certain the vote was AGAINST well before AD showed up on the thread, although I can't be sure.
I also find it insulting to 10KI residents that you seem to believe none of us can think for ourselves and that we blindly follow AD.
On a separate note, you took "The Mega Chicken of 3LiT3"'s post out of context, he had already posted, before AD did mind you, his vote of being AGAINST.
by Ananke II » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:41 pm
A mean old man wrote:how they and their endorsers have been manipulated by a single person to do otherwise.
A mean old man wrote:So she's towing the thread to a place where I cannot see it, I believe.
Well, I think we've got all we need to know here.
by New Rockport » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:51 pm
A mean old man wrote:New Rockport wrote:OOC: I voted in favor of the original commendation of 10000 Islands and against its repeal. However, if the 10000 Islanders are so humorless as to take offense at Yelda's joke and so vindictive as to torpedo this commendation, then I'll probably reconsider my support for any possible future commendation of 10000 Islands.
Don't drop down to that level; It's just as bad as what it's protesting. There's no question that they've done a lot with TITO and deserve a commendation, however disappointing their attitude may be.
by Iron Felix » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:34 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:He places the milking stool down on the dais, but when he actually looks at the part of the cow where her udder should be, he can't find it. Instinctively he reaches underneath to investigate...
by Kanaia » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:46 pm
A mean old man wrote:Kanaia wrote:I also find it insulting to 10KI residents that you seem to believe none of us can think for ourselves and that we blindly follow AD.
"None of you?" Did I say that? No, I'm saying that many of the voters, at least the ones who are posting in the commendation's thread and who have been voting against it, have been influenced by the ideas that AD put into their heads. My evidence of that has already been displayed.
Now why did you vote against the resolution (if you did)? Was it for the same petty grievance against Yelda making fun of 10kI and ruining it forever? Or did you VUI as well (Vote Under the Influence)?
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by Nerdocrombesia » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:53 pm
Ananke II wrote:Many of our older members have experienced their share of betrayals and nasty propaganda campaigns in NS, so aren't too tolerant of what they perceive of as attacks. I thought WA campaigners were used to lobby delegates in different ways.
by Nerdocrombesia » Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:01 pm
Kalibarr wrote:Come on TITO, surely you know people read public sections of your forum? and when you post things that might offend them, they see it. And you said he was trolling you?
by Ghamaryana » Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:01 pm
by Kanaia » Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:03 pm
Nerdocrombesia wrote:Ananke II wrote:Many of our older members have experienced their share of betrayals and nasty propaganda campaigns in NS, so aren't too tolerant of what they perceive of as attacks. I thought WA campaigners were used to lobby delegates in different ways.
Speaking of attacks. Before the thread was moved to a private area, I seem to remember reading an asinine comment by AD (or someone) to the effect of "attacking his (Yelda's) region". As the founder of said region, all I can say is "BRING IT".
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement