"Raider unity"Cormactopia II wrote:Le Cormac Snip
Advertisement
by UED » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:36 am
by Tinhampton » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:42 am
by Cormactopia II » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:46 am
Tinhampton wrote:From the desk of Alexander Smith
Tinhamptonian Delegate-Ambassador to the World Assembly
I can categorically deny that we have carried out the act of "impressing Mousebumples". If I did talk about Mousebumples (and I did), it was only in passing reference to the power they wielded in terms of delegate votes, not as an almighty shower of praise. In terms of our raider status, we remain "raiders in name only" as of the moment of writing. We may nominally be part of a raider division within a region, but we have had no contact with fellow raiders in the division, nor have we carried out any actual raiding.
by Tretrid » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:50 am
by Mons Garle » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:04 pm
UED wrote:Well I urge anyone who reads this to understand that the LEADERSHIP of the Social Liberal Union have come out against this Liberation proposal as it clearly glorifies the raiders.
by Tahkranul » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:07 pm
by Galiagolach » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:09 pm
by Kelinfort » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:10 pm
Impressed, despite the dire situation in Social Liberal Union, that Marshal T E Lawrence of The Invaders, in cohorts with other elite raiders, was able to conduct this seemingly-impossible invasion,
by UED » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:14 pm
Kelinfort wrote:Impressed, despite the dire situation in Social Liberal Union, that Marshal T E Lawrence of The Invaders, in cohorts with other elite raiders, was able to conduct this seemingly-impossible invasion,
Statement from Westphalia's Minister of Foreign Affairs (Fuck it, this doesn't even deserve a formal header):
Fuck this Resolution
In no uncertain terms, Against.
by Lord Ravenclaw » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:16 pm
by The Atlae Isles » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:16 pm
Tretrid wrote:I shall be voting against this because:
- The raider delegate supports this
- The natives oppose it
- There is a better proposal
- I received propaganda against the resolution
- There is no need for a liberation, as there is no password,
- The first letter in each clause spell "RAIDER", and most importantly,
- The nation which proposed it resigned shortly afterwards.
by Social Mysterion » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:18 pm
New Zacharianasville wrote:Even if it is a raider sanctioned and made bill, none the less, it still advocates for the liberation of the region, which will help yall, so I will keep my "for" vote.
by Tretrid » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:19 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Tretrid wrote:I shall be voting against this because:
- The raider delegate supports this
- The natives oppose it
- There is a better proposal
- I received propaganda against the resolution
- There is no need for a liberation, as there is no password,
- The first letter in each clause spell "RAIDER", and most importantly,
- The nation which proposed it resigned shortly afterwards.
Even when you take pareidolia into account, it seems too good to be true, no?
The Atlae Isles delegation shall vote AGAINST the resolution.
by Mons Garle » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:22 pm
by UED » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:23 pm
Mons Garle wrote:Just to make it crystal clear to all, the Raider Delegate of the SLU has voted FOR this resolution. I somehow doubt they would be acting in the interests of our region.
Please vote against!
by Crysuko » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:25 pm
by Tretrid » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:26 pm
UED wrote:Mons Garle wrote:Just to make it crystal clear to all, the Raider Delegate of the SLU has voted FOR this resolution. I somehow doubt they would be acting in the interests of our region.
Please vote against!
^^^
In other news South Pacific and Rejected Realms have voted against!
We cannot in good conscience allow the raiders to abuse the powers of the Security Council and push their agenda!
by Mons Garle » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:28 pm
by Navaronia » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:29 pm
by Eggy216 » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:31 pm
by Deladara » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:34 pm
by Tinhampton » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:39 pm
by Social Mysterion » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:43 pm
Boghorn wrote:I understand that this proposal seems to have been written by a raider, but a liberation is a liberation regardless, so why is it that you are so adamant that this proposal be shot down?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement