NATION

PASSWORD

PASSED: Repeal "Freedom of Marriage Act"

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Dear World Assembly...

"...Your latest act to repeal Freedom of Marriage Act is the most unconscionably evil proposition to hit the GA floor in a long while. It is well established from previous debates that the author, this "Kenny" dude, is a BIG GAY HOMOPHOBE and his hellish efforts must be shot down!"
10
14%
"...While we respect the motives of the lovably buffoonish sponsors of this repeal, we simply cannot risk striking out one resolution protecting gay couples when leaving both in place will do twice the job. Thanks but no thanks on your bridge to nowhere."
6
9%
"...This much-ballyhooed COCR may APPEAR to protect gay marriage on its face, but everyone knows that the Magic Invisible Clauses actually order us to pump all gay couples full of lead as soon as they reach the courthouse! Just ask the Secretariat!"
5
7%
"...We tend to agree with the Railanan ambassador that the institution of marriage is nothing but a glorified baby factory, and opening the door to loving gay couples -- adorable though they are -- poses a direct threat to our birthrate. Our NS country may already have 20 billion citizens, but that's still not enough! REPEAL FOMA!"
5
7%
"...The Kennyites actually make a good point here. Although that probably means the world is ending, and everybody should run for cover, we have to agree that redundant legislation should be stricken out when other resolutions already do a better job at it than the original. The Gittin'-Jiggy-with-It Republic of $NAME votes FOR."
19
27%
"...Thanks for pointing out that even though FOMA only protects same-sex couples, COCR protects couples of any kind seeking marriage. I can't wait to tie the knot with my Hot Alien Cousin! Mom and Dad probably won't talk to me anymore, but I fail to see the downside! WOOHOO! Me and Kalinda are hitting Vegas as soon as I hit "Send"!"
13
19%
"...Your latest episode, "Kenny versus the Gay Mafia," kicks so much ass it's not even funny! Slanderous accusations! Heavy Wild Turkey intake! Saber-rattling threats against Chechnya! A frickin' DEATH STAR, man! Let the critics grouse that it's just a rerun from 2006; you guys deserve an Emmy!"
1
1%
"...Alright, I'm confused. That maniac threatening to blow up the GA wants to repeal FOMA, yes? But won't blowing up the GA effectively repeal ALL standing legislation? Tell him to press the damned button already and let's avoid another corrupt and hollow debate!"
11
16%
 
Total votes : 70

User avatar
The Dark Star Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Oct 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dark Star Republic » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:48 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:Maybe very pedantic but LGBT isn't just the rights of same sex couples. It also includes the rights of transgendered who may not identify as male or female. The last sentence says that this repeal does not give countries the right to discriminate against same sex couples, but what about transgender couples?

The Freedom of Marriage Act doesn't even touch on that (in fact, it specifically uses "sex" rather than "gender"). The repeal can't remove any protections for transgender couples because the original resolution doesn't give any protections to transgender couples.

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:50 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:Maybe very pedantic but LGBT isn't just the rights of same sex couples. It also includes the rights of transgendered who may not identify as male or female. The last sentence says that this repeal does not give countries the right to discriminate against same sex couples, but what about transgender couples?

"CoCR, Article 1, section 3:"
c ) All inhabitants of member states have the right not to be and indeed must not be discriminated against on grounds including sex, race, ethnicity, nationality, skin color, language, economic or cultural background, physical or mental disability or condition, religion or belief system, sexual orientation or sexual identity, or any other arbitrarily assigned and reductive categorisation which may be used for the purposes of discrimination, except for compelling practical purposes, such as hiring only female staff to work with battered women who have sought refuge from their abusers.

"It covers 'Transgender' fairly well"

BURNINATI0N wrote:The WA CAN and DID solve it for me.

Clover shook her head, clearly not understanding why this ambassador was being so silly "You do realize that there is nothing preventing your government from passing a domestic law that clarifies and guarantees these rights, correct? If that is some sort of hindrance to you, then I would suggest there is more issue in your nation than this repeal"
Last edited by Normlpeople on Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:53 am

Normlpeople wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:Maybe very pedantic but LGBT isn't just the rights of same sex couples. It also includes the rights of transgendered who may not identify as male or female. The last sentence says that this repeal does not give countries the right to discriminate against same sex couples, but what about transgender couples?

"CoCR, Article 1, section 3:"
c ) All inhabitants of member states have the right not to be and indeed must not be discriminated against on grounds including sex, race, ethnicity, nationality, skin color, language, economic or cultural background, physical or mental disability or condition, religion or belief system, sexual orientation or sexual identity, or any other arbitrarily assigned and reductive categorisation which may be used for the purposes of discrimination, except for compelling practical purposes, such as hiring only female staff to work with battered women who have sought refuge from their abusers.

"It covers 'Transgender' fairly well"

It's repealing that act. Transgender rights are not protected if the document protecting them is repealed, and the document repealing it does not specify that they are still protected.

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:55 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Normlpeople wrote:"CoCR, Article 1, section 3:"
c ) All inhabitants of member states have the right not to be and indeed must not be discriminated against on grounds including sex, race, ethnicity, nationality, skin color, language, economic or cultural background, physical or mental disability or condition, religion or belief system, sexual orientation or sexual identity, or any other arbitrarily assigned and reductive categorisation which may be used for the purposes of discrimination, except for compelling practical purposes, such as hiring only female staff to work with battered women who have sought refuge from their abusers.

"It covers 'Transgender' fairly well"

It's repealing that act. Transgender rights are not protected if the document protecting them is repealed, and the document repealing it does not specify that they are still protected.


"Perhaps you are mistaken. The act being repealed is the 'Freedom of Marriage Act', not the 'Charter of Civil Rights', which is where that passage was taken from"
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:56 am

Normlpeople wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:It's repealing that act. Transgender rights are not protected if the document protecting them is repealed, and the document repealing it does not specify that they are still protected.


"Perhaps you are mistaken. The act being repealed is the 'Freedom of Marriage Act', not the 'Charter of Civil Rights', which is where that passage was taken from"

Alright.

Does that then make the last sentence protecting same sex couples redundant though?

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:59 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Normlpeople wrote:
"Perhaps you are mistaken. The act being repealed is the 'Freedom of Marriage Act', not the 'Charter of Civil Rights', which is where that passage was taken from"

Alright.

Does that then make the last sentence protecting same sex couples redundant though?


"Absolutely it does. That just clarifies that such marriages are still protected, as to silence the 'you're being anti-gay' crowd that would chime in otherwise. Kind of like the ambassador from Burnination has already tried to do."
Last edited by Normlpeople on Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:01 am

Normlpeople wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:Alright.

Does that then make the last sentence protecting same sex couples redundant though?


"Absolutely it does. That just clarifies that such marriages are still protected, as to silence the 'you're being anti-gay' crowd that would chime in otherwise. Kind of like the ambassador from Burnination has already tried to do."

I would have just specified that it protects LGBT couples, but again super pedantic.

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7528
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:15 am

I can't support this repeal whilst it's supported by someone such as the ambassador from South Sahahra, I'm concerned that I'd become stupider through some kind of osmosis by association.

Abstain.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:29 am

Hirota wrote:I can't support this repeal whilst it's supported by someone such as the ambassador from South Sahahra, I'm concerned that I'd become stupider through some kind of osmosis by association.

Abstain.


"Unfortunately, such people do exist. Best to just ignore said existence. After all, this repeal brings out all sorts of backward, offensive and silly nations to support. We can take comfort in knowing that the goal they seek will be blocked by the CoCR.

As far as stupidity, I'm not sure its transferable by association alone. Besides, those of us who voluntarily serve as Ambassadors long-term already have some degree of stupidity... or masochistic streak."
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
Railana
Diplomat
 
Posts: 518
Founded: Apr 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Railana » Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:26 am

((OOC: I have to say, I'm stunned that this is passing. Congrats, Kenny, you've accomplished what I never could.))
Dominion of Railana
Also known as Auralia

"Lex naturalis voluntas Dei est."

User avatar
Sionis Prioratus
Senator
 
Posts: 3537
Founded: Feb 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sionis Prioratus » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:23 am

This old Nation is reminded of this.

Yours,
Cathérine Victoire de Saint-Clair
Haute Ambassadrice for the WA for
✡ The Jewish Kingdom of Sionis Prioratus
Daughter of The Late King Adrian the First
In the Name of
Sa Majesté Impériale Dagobert VI de Saint-Clair
A simple truth

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:59 pm

Your "old nation" seems to have forgotten Charter of Civil Rights, which effectively bans all of those things you mentioned in that apocalyptic old post. But it is good to see that the Geritol has you back up and about again.

Best of wishes,
Last edited by Omigodtheykilledkenny on Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7528
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:30 am

You kids and your crazy definitions of old.

(Enter another older nation than mine in 3....2....1.....)
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Drewlantis
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Nov 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Drewlantis » Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:31 am

I almost didn't want to post because I am not older than Hirota and I didn't want to break the streak, but...
Hirota wrote:I can't support this repeal whilst it's supported by someone such as the ambassador from South Sahahra, I'm concerned that I'd become stupider through some kind of osmosis by association.

Abstain.

"Or perhaps the Ambassador may become more intelligent by association with you?.. I like to look at the positives."

"As for the repeal itself.." Ambassador Burgenheimer peruses the legislation... "Looks ship shape to me, perhaps I'm biased though, because I didn't like the bill in the first place."
With Regards,
Fromm Burgenheimer.
Minister of the Department of Diplomacy, Ambassador to the WA, Advisor Second Class to Emperor Imperator Andrew Lake the First.
Personality Type: ENTP, that means watch out ladies and gentlemen, either I'm going to take over the world, or rig a toaster to fly, I don't know yet..
Additional random psychology information: No, I'm not insane, and I have no mental illnesses. I am highly intelligent with some narcissistic tendencies who can be very charming when I want to be, which is sometimes described as psychopathy, but I highly doubt it.. Sometimes.. ;)

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7528
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Fri Feb 06, 2015 2:58 pm

Drewlantis wrote:I almost didn't want to post because I am not older than Hirota and I didn't want to break the streak, but...
I was mocking the fact that supposedly being an old nation means anything. Appeal To False Authority, I think.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Socialist Assembly Marxists
Attaché
 
Posts: 75
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Assembly Marxists » Fri Feb 06, 2015 3:03 pm

Abstain. :p

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Fri Feb 06, 2015 6:13 pm

[Jack Riley rises to seek recognition.]

Ladies and gentlemen of the World Assembly, I'd like to thank you for your patience during my unfortunate tardiness. Apparently one of the transports in the lobby portal banks malfunctioned and instead of sending me home, it brought me to this bizarre country called "Defwa," where women seeking abortion are brought to delivery rooms to have their pregnancies "terminated," and school children are taught to look for the hidden text in books, to find out what the author really meant when he wrote, "See Spot run." But on the plus side, not a speck of space junk in the wide night sky! What a resourceful, ecologically minded people!

But I'm here now, and I appreciate this opportunity to present our delegation's repeal of the Freedom of Marriage Act. If the Assembly will allow me, I do have a short video presentation to show you, which should help allay any concerns about our motives in repealing a law that (purportedly) protects marriage equality.

[The lights dim as the massive projection screen lowers in front of the dais at the front of the chamber, as the secretary slips a DVD into a digital projector. Sappy music begins to play whilst on the screen some stock footage from the frozen oasis of Omigodtheykilledkenny is shown, and a deep, soothing male voice narrates:]

"Our land may be far removed from most countries of the world. We are separated by vast oceans, continents, deep language and cultural divides, religious differences -- our jihadists are actually
Christians...

"But at the World Assembly, we all share common goals. A concern for quality legislation..."

[cut to Susa laughing his ass off while introducing an illegal repeal in 2007]

"A mind for human rights..."

[cut to shot of Kennyites pointing and laughing at non-human species speaking in the GA]

"Recognizing the need for eliminating abusive and inhumane practices such as torture..."

[several shots of Kennyites defenestrating fellow delegates and Susa kicking them in the nuts]

"But most of all, a profound interest in protecting LGBT rights..."

[shot of the Kennyite delegation lazily passing around a bottle of Sen. Sulla's Wild Turkey during the last gay-rights debate]

"We may not always see eye to eye, but our shared values and common purpose always shine through, and you always know who you can trust."

[shot of Kennyite flag flying with other national banners outside WA Headquarters]

"The people of the Federal Republic. Partners in Justice."

[Several seconds' worth of TV snow can be seen on the screen, followed by grainy footage of what appears to be a large gorilla rampaging through the Kennyite offices, while a woman operating the camera gives direction: "Now remember, Ambassador, you are the dangerous and hormonal gorilla that has escaped from his habitat, and I am the sexy zookeeper who needs to teach you a lesson you'll never forget..."

[A muffled voice coming from inside the gorilla: "Dammit, Captain, this gorilla suit is hot as fuck!"]

"Oh my God, it's one of those degenerates' home movies," observes Jimmy in disgust. "Turn it off!"

"Hang on, hang on, I'm just trying to remember what to do here," replies Riley as he fiddles with the projector.

"Turn it off!!"

"What's this thing here--oh bother--"

[A couple shots ring out and the video feed suddenly dies. Smoke is rising from the projector, as Captain Chiang lowers her 9mm.]

"Y'know, Captain, this wasn't our projector; it belongs to the Genera--"

"Oh shut up, Mr. Secretary!"

[The presiding officer bangs her gaval.]


The Federal Republic's time has expired. The chair now recognizes the delegation from the Islamic States.

[A menacing figure in a dark mask rises to address to the GA.]

Madame Secretary-General, we rise to condemn this assembly, and any such den of heathens, that would even consider this a subject worthy of debate. Any decadent body that thinks such "rights" even exist in order to be "protected" deserves the full dose of God's wrath. In fact--

[opens coat to reveal a suicide vest]

I am the servant of Almighty God, that the wicked here assembled may share in his Infinite Justice--

[An angry scream breaks out from the Kennyite delegation:]

"I'm as down with slaughtering the infidels as the next guy, but the fuck if I'm gonna let you fuckers
steal my act!!!"

[Susa roars as he charges toward the Islamic States delegation, pulling out his trusty detonator as he dives straight into the middle of the masked contingent. A fantastic boom rips through the Assembly hall as the explosion wipes out the entire section of the GA where the IS diplomats once stood.

[Chiang looks up from her iPhone. "Heh. Leave it to the Islamic States to make Susa a partner in the fight against terror."]



Meanwhile, from the safety of the green room in the Kennyite office suite, a closet door opens and a swirling vortex inside spits Susa out before slamming door shut again.

The Xt'Tap sputters as he climbs up from the floor, blanketed in soot.

Jimmy, who had retreated from the Assembly hall during the commotion, looks on with bemusement. "Leave it to the Defense Department to steal Wolf-Guardian technology and develop
simulated-suicide vests! How many simulated deaths does this make, Susa?"

"Shut the fuck up."
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
The Eternal Kawaii
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1761
Founded: Apr 21, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Eternal Kawaii » Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:12 pm

The Kawaiian Nuncia sighs at the all-too-typical display of Kennyite crassness, and gives a slow clap. Taking the dais in her turn, she clears her throat and says,

"In the Name of the Eternal Kawaii, may the Cute One be praised.

"We shall be abstaining on this vote, as we have no particular interest in commenting on the heathen practices it so proudly discusses. We only note the irony, considering the last two votes of this chamber--votes that clearly indicate that the World Assembly believes prosecution of crimes against humanity should be left to the individual nation. A bold statement in support of NatSov, indeed. However, when it comes to respect for an individual nation's cultural values--such as their marriage customs--where is this bold NatSov attitude to be found?

"We can only conclude that passing judgment over national cultures is more important to this chamber than the prosecution of war criminals. What does this say about the seriousness of the World Assembly?"
Learn More about The Eternal Kawaii from our Factbook!

"Aside from being illegal, it's not like Max Barry Day was that bad of a resolution." -- Glen Rhodes
"as a member of the GA elite, I don't have to take this" -- Vancouvia

User avatar
RNMC
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby RNMC » Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:15 am

We here will not recognize any marriage that is not one man and one Woman period no matter what any act, bill or law gets passed in the WA. It will still be illegal here no matter what.

User avatar
Mousebumples
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 8623
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Mousebumples » Sat Feb 07, 2015 10:43 am

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:I suppose we will. She may decide to stomp just because she's still mad about my RF repeal, but I don't recall her having any passionate feelings about FOMA one way or the other.

At any rate she hasn't responded to any of my messages, so I'm gonna have to watch from the cheap seats like the rest of you guys. :p

If you sent me any messages on this one, I never got them, so I'm not sure where you're sending them. :unsure:

Anyhow, the region is currently deadlocked on this one (I personally abstained since I'm rather meh on the subject of this repeal), so I haven't voted. Might change over the remainder of the vote, but I think you've got this repeal safely in hand.
Leader of the Mouse-a-rific Mousetastic Moderator Mousedom of Mousebumples
Past WA Delegate for Europeia & Monkey Island
Proud Member of UNOG
I'm an "adorably marvelous NatSov" - Mallorea and Riva
GA Resolutions (sorted by category) | Why Repeal? | Reppy's Sig Workshop

User avatar
The Dark Star Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Oct 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dark Star Republic » Sat Feb 07, 2015 11:25 am

"We have decided to support this.

"Our main reservation was that we don't like The Charter on Civil Rights, and this repeal will surely bolster support for it, but the chances of it being repealed anyway are slim, while this repeal makes an obvious straightforward argument. So, good luck to its proponents."

~ Vice-Colonel Truculent Bilgewater
Ambassador to the WA

User avatar
Defwa
Minister
 
Posts: 2598
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Defwa » Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:17 pm

RNMC wrote:We here will not recognize any marriage that is not one man and one Woman period no matter what any act, bill or law gets passed in the WA. It will still be illegal here no matter what.

Well that's nice. So why are you a member of this assembly?
You know we mandate free abortion here too.
__________Federated City States of ____________________Defwa__________
Federation Head High Wizard of Dal Angela Landfree
Ambassadorial Delegate Maestre Wizard Mikyal la Vert

President and World Assembly Delegate of the Democratic Socialist Assembly
Defwa offers assistance with humanitarian aid, civilian evacuation, arbitration, negotiation, and human rights violation monitoring.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:22 pm

RNMC wrote:We here will not recognize any marriage that is not one man and one Woman period no matter what any act, bill or law gets passed in the WA. It will still be illegal here no matter what.

"It shocks me that nations that refuse to follow WA law, yet remain members, expect any kind of sympathy or special consideration by those nations who do follow the law." :roll:

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:04 pm

Defwa wrote:
RNMC wrote:We here will not recognize any marriage that is not one man and one Woman period no matter what any act, bill or law gets passed in the WA. It will still be illegal here no matter what.

Well that's nice. So why are you a member of this assembly?
You know we mandate free abortion here too.

We mandate subsidized abortion now??
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
The Dark Star Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Oct 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dark Star Republic » Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:37 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
Defwa wrote:Well that's nice. So why are you a member of this assembly?
You know we mandate free abortion here too.

We mandate subsidized abortion now??

Depends how you interpret Quality in Health Services, I suppose:
5) Nations or any assigned political divisions shall retain full freedom to:
...
b) Provide assistance only to those who cannot afford to pay for their own care, if compelling practical purposes for such a policy can be proven beyond any doubt.

Always hated that resolution.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads