Draica wrote:OOC: Question to raiders..Why are most raiders trolls/people who hate religious people?
Yeah, take that question elsewhere. This is for discussion on the proposal.
Advertisement
by SkyDip » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:48 am
Draica wrote:OOC: Question to raiders..Why are most raiders trolls/people who hate religious people?
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:11 am
Venico wrote:I don't like that this implies the ideology of NatSov being condemnable O.o Or at least repealing poor legislation.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Venico » Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:13 pm
by Mallorea and Riva » Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:27 pm
Venico wrote:At its foundation it is anti-superfluous laws. It means a preference towards leaving issues to nations rather than the WA. And he isn't impressing the ideology on the WA...he makes a coherent argument and then the WA agrees with him allowing his repeals to be passed. That's hardly condemnable.
by Ahntong » Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:17 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:21 pm
Ahntong wrote:and that not only signals a certain disrespect for democratic decisions, it also takes up time & resources that could be spend on other proposals.
by Margno » Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:28 pm
by Inventio » Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:00 pm
Margno wrote:I'd suggest at least mentioning his outrageously unethical behavior in the GA#2 scandal. I get that Auralia's divisive and a lot of people aren't gonna want to feel like they're supporting him, but the Dourian Embassy has clearly crossed a line.
Sapin Military District wrote:If god doesn't exist, then why does a tissue pop up every time you take the old one out of the box?
Diviar wrote:Nah, Inventio isn't scared easily.
Divair wrote:Nonchalance is my default attitude.
by Mousebumples » Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:47 pm
Inventio wrote:Margno wrote:I'd suggest at least mentioning his outrageously unethical behavior in the GA#2 scandal. I get that Auralia's divisive and a lot of people aren't gonna want to feel like they're supporting him, but the Dourian Embassy has clearly crossed a line.
OOC: It was submitted before that, unfortunately. I don't think SkyDip is going to pull it from the queue 3 approvals before quorum.
by Starkmoor » Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:25 pm
by Chester Pearson » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:57 pm
Mousebumples wrote:I agree - although I wish he would. I think that would be a much stronger argument that would be much more likely to pass.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Mallorea and Riva » Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Chester Pearson wrote:Mousebumples wrote:I agree - although I wish he would. I think that would be a much stronger argument that would be much more likely to pass.
I personally feel that Douria's behavior regarding that particular should not be glorified within a condemnation. All it will do is set a bad precedent for other players to follow.
by Chester Pearson » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:48 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Chester Pearson wrote:
I personally feel that Douria's behavior regarding that particular should not be glorified within a condemnation. All it will do is set a bad precedent for other players to follow.
If only we had some sort of tool to express our condemnation of his actions via the SC.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by 0rville Redenbacher » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:17 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:19 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Burtonia WA Embassy » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:29 pm
by Kelinfort » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:45 pm
by Railana » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:30 am
by The Sotoan Union » Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:23 am
by Chester Pearson » Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:39 am
Kelinfort wrote:(In all honesty, Auralia lost all credibility with me when the whole self commend thing came to pass. Again, with the WA mission, any shred of voting for another resolution similar, I shall not vote for. A personal vendetta is hardly worth a condemnation, unless you decide to condemn Auralia as well.)
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by SkyDip » Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:42 am
Chester Pearson wrote:Kelinfort wrote:(In all honesty, Auralia lost all credibility with me when the whole self commend thing came to pass. Again, with the WA mission, any shred of voting for another resolution similar, I shall not vote for. A personal vendetta is hardly worth a condemnation, unless you decide to condemn Auralia as well.)
Where is the personal vendetta mentioned?
Yet another sad case of someone blowing their horn before they actually READ the resolution....
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement