[DEFEATED] Repeal SC#17 Condemn Omigodtheykilledkenny

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

Here is some advice to you, then. Discuss the proposal, instead of serially meandering about pointless crap like game settings and telegram stamps.

Fixed for Terravoss.

[Terravoss]

A telegram campaign on a proposal is fair game to discuss in that proposal's thread. Terravoss's contributions to the debate haven't been great, but that post was more useful than Yelda's.

I was trying to be constructive. I advised United Federation of Canada to post less.

That was my post you fool, not UFC's. Why does everyone here believe that I am Canada? Just because Kenny took credit for getting him booted out of the WA (which was a lie), you believe I am Canada, and I am going after Kenny's badge as retribution? Obviously you are far more obtuse than you make yourself out to be.

Here is some advice to you, then. Discuss the proposal, instead of serially meandering about pointless crap like game settings and telegram stamps.

Fixed for Terravoss.

Oh how cute. You can edit quotes. Why discuss it Kenny? It is not like meaningless debate ever changed anyones opinion on how they vote. The fact that you had to send out a campaign, to keep you badge just proved this whole endeavour to be worth it though. If one needs to campaign to keep there own CONDEMNATION, did they really deserve to be condemned in the first place?

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

[Ponderosa]

Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge.

If such an argument exists, for Christ's sake post it now. The fact that you haven't discovered it yet indicates that you either did not spend enough time on this, or that there is no such argument.

[Yelda]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

Jesus....

[Communist Eraser]

Constantly resubmitting usually just pisses the major delegates off. Theyll vote stack right away and crush it on day one.

[Christom]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

Let's not to mention the fact that you've poisoned the well for a while. Your repeal text talks about all the good things Kenny has done, and tries to make it seem like you're doing him a favor by repealing his condemnation.

Then everyone gets a TG saying that just ain't so, from the guy you're praising in the repeal. Yeah, you didn't think this one through.

If your future efforts are as bumbling as this one's was, you'll have a long successful career in the WA.

Wait, what?

[Kahchi]

Just give up already. It's futile and pointless, not too mention irritating.

[Abacathea]

As a delegate I certainly don't carry the weight that the likes of Cormac, Feux or Jamie Anumia do, to name but a few. But if you see the plan through to constantly resubmit this I will be there the second this act comes to vote each and every time to set the lemming vote into the negative straight away. You've poisoned your own chalice announcing your intent on a more powerful enemy here.

[Jinkx Monsoon]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

This doesn't read as bitter at all. Nope. Not at all!

Voted against this proposal and will continue to vote against this proposal every time it makes it to the voting stage.

[DWAsnia]

Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge.

If such an argument exists, for Christ's sake post it now. The fact that you haven't discovered it yet indicates that you either did not spend enough time on this, or that there is no such argument.

I vote for both.

[The Eternal Kawaii]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

Jesus....

Would "being a vindictive ass" be sufficient grounds for a condemnation?

[Terravoss]

Jesus....

Would "being a vindictive ass" be sufficient grounds for a condemnation?

If the Security Council sees fit to condemn me over this, then be my guest. It will just prove my point yet again.

Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge.

If such an argument exists, for Christ's sake post it now. The fact that you haven't discovered it yet indicates that you either did not spend enough time on this, or that there is no such argument.

Why? Why waste a good argument on a repeal that is going to fail? Why not start out fresh in a few months with a whole new argument, when a majority of delegates will have forgot this whole episode?

You see? It is all about timing really. This here "debate" cast doubt on rather Kenny really deserves that badge in the first place. Kenny also played all his cards right off the bat, trying to discredit the repeal, which did not work. When this was passing by over 1K votes, he pulled out the hidden ace, and launched a campaign. If he plays that card again, do really believe it will carry the same weight? Nor do I. Also, all the Kenny lackeys and supporters came out of the woodwork on this one, and have now been identified, so it makes them easier to isolate next time.

Like I said, it is all about timing, my friend.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

So profound, I'm sure, it will completely mask your self-contradictory assertions that you want only to restore "sensibility" and "balance and order" to a Council you so vehemently despise.

[Retired WerePenguins]

That was my post you fool, not UFC's. Why does everyone here believe that I am Canada?

I find this quote fascinating, and so I actually took the time to do a search. Yes, it's true, the words Terravoss and Canada come up in only two posts, this one and the one he replied to. Yet, Terravoss insists that "everyone" believes he is Canada. Fascinating, don't you think, Is this what they call a "Freudian Slip?" Not that I am saying anything. I'm told that some of the game mods don't take too kindly to people using their puppets to increase the counts of the SC posts and since you and UFoC have already posted on this thread, I have to assume that you don't want to get into bad terms with the game moderators. So if this was true you wouldn't have done anything as STUPID (as game mods have ways to see who is the puppet of whom) as to do such a vile thing.

[Terravoss]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. You hate the "Festering Snakepit", and I despise it, so I have no problems wasting the councils time in vote after vote over your undeserved badge. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

So profound, I'm sure, it will completely mask your self-contradictory assertions that you want only to restore "sensibility" and "balance and order" to a Council you so vehemently despise.

I only despise the council due to its sheer stupidity, when it blew "Liberate Nazi Europe" down the shoot like sack of greased weasels. Before that, I thought the council was actually doing a "semi-decent" job. You on the other hand take great pleasure in disrupting everything this council does, so therefore why should this council continue to reward you with a badge that you flaunt around so proudly may I ask?

That was my post you fool, not UFC's. Why does everyone here believe that I am Canada?

I find this quote fascinating, and so I actually took the time to do a search. Yes, it's true, the words Terravoss and Canada come up in only two posts, this one and the one he replied to. Yet, Terravoss insists that "everyone" believes he is Canada. Fascinating, don't you think, Is this what they call a "Freudian Slip?" Not that I am saying anything. I'm told that some of the game mods don't take too kindly to people using their puppets to increase the counts of the SC posts and since you and UFoC have already posted on this thread, I have to assume that you don't want to get into bad terms with the game moderators. So if this was true you wouldn't have done anything as STUPID (as game mods have ways to see who is the puppet of whom) as to do such a vile thing.

Interesting theory. Well worth the read my good sir. My question for you is, what does this have to to do with Kenny's badge, or the debate itself?

[Sciongrad]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

Unfamiliar with the sheer ineptitude and petty vendettas of the particular council, the good ambassador Santos was more accustomed to simply sheer ineptitude, as in the General Assembly. Timidly but surely, she rose from her seat to address the assembly, her hands nervously fiddling in her pocket. As she prepared to speak, she looked at the portion of her frail hands protruding from her pockets. As she looked up to address the crowd, she turned her attention specifically to ambassador from Terravoss, and slowly began to withdraw her hands from her pockets. As she began to speak, she removed a crucifix from one hand and a rosary bead from the other, and began chanting at a volume that seemed to juxtapose her small stature and timid disposition.

"Exorcizamus te, omnis immundus spiritus omnis satanica potestas, omnis incursio infernalis adversarii, omnis legio, omnis congregatio et secta diabolica. Ergo draco maledicte et omnis legio diabolica adjuramus te. Cessa decipere humanas creaturas, eisque aeternae Perditionis venenum propinare. Vade, Satana, inventor et magister omnis fallaciae, hostis humanae salutis. Humiliare sub potenti manu dei, contremisce et effuge, invocato a nobis sancto et terribili nomine, quem inferi tremunt.

We exorcise you impure spirit! From the snares of the devil free us!"

Seething with religious fervor and foaming from the mouth, the frail old woman proceeded to douse the surrounding ambassadors in holy water and chanted unintelligible gibberish at them. Seeing how much worse this would inevitably get, the Scionite deputy ambassador, Ricardo, ran and dragged to plump plenipotentiary to the exit, but not before shouting "please stop the madness ambassador, if not for the poor ambassador soaked in chrism oil, then for me."

Interesting theory. Well worth the read my good sir. My question for you is, what does this have to to do with Kenny's badge, or the debate itself?

Your motives, which are quite relevant considering how hard you've worked to conceal it.

[Terravoss]

Your motives, which are quite relevant considering how hard you've worked to conceal it.

What exactly have I tried to conceal here? I have made my true intentions clear many times. This is about restoring some sensibility to the council. If you believe I have ulterior motives, why don't you share with the rest of us?

[DWAsnia]

What exactly have I tried to conceal here?

Well, maybe your true identity. That's a good start.

I have made my true intentions clear many times. This is about restoring some sensibility to the council.

I don't think those are your true intentions, or at least, they're really poor intentions.

If you believe I have ulterior motives, why don't you share with the rest of us?

I have no idea what might be your ulterior motives, especially not knowing who the real puppetmaster is. My best guess is you don't like Kenny and want to take his shiny badge away, but that's just pure speculation.

So go on, tell us who you really are.

[Sciongrad]

Your motives, which are quite relevant considering how hard you've worked to conceal it.

What exactly have I tried to conceal here? I have made my true intentions clear many times. This is about restoring some sensibility to the council. If you believe I have ulterior motives, why don't you share with the rest of us?

I would imagine the reason most ambassadors think you have an ulterior motive is because you'd have to be obtuse to believe the one you've provided. If you were truly interested in improving the integrity of this council, not only would you have started with the meat and potatoes as opposed to the well written one you've chosen to target, but you'd put some more effort into your own proposal text, as the state of this one isn't much better than that (that is, the supposed chaff in the annals of SC laws) which you seek to repeal.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

I was trying to be constructive. I advised United Federation of Canada to post less.

That was my post you fool, not UFC's. Why does everyone here believe that I am Canada? Just because Kenny took credit for getting him booted out of the WA (which was a lie), you believe I am Canada, and I am going after Kenny's badge as retribution? Obviously you are far more obtuse than you make yourself out to be.

Hmm. Interesting. I don't recall this ever being discussed anywhere in this thread. Does anyone else?

...oops.

[The North Polish Union]

Even if this fails, and it looks like it probably will, I will just keep coming after that badge over and over Kenny. Eventually I will present an argument so profound, that not even a telegram campaign will keep you from losing that badge, and thus STEP ONE of "The Glorious Crusade of Justice" to return some sensibility back to this heap of dung known as the Security Council will be complete.

Unfamiliar with the sheer ineptitude and petty vendettas of the particular council, the good ambassador Santos was more accustomed to simply sheer ineptitude, as in the General Assembly. Timidly but surely, she rose from her seat to address the assembly, her hands nervously fiddling in her pocket. As she prepared to speak, she looked at the portion of her frail hands protruding from her pockets. As she looked up to address the crowd, she turned her attention specifically to ambassador from Terravoss, and slowly began to withdraw her hands from her pockets. As she began to speak, she removed a crucifix from one hand and a rosary bead from the other, and began chanting at a volume that seemed to juxtapose her small stature and timid disposition.

"Exorcizamus te, omnis immundus spiritus omnis satanica potestas, omnis incursio infernalis adversarii, omnis legio, omnis congregatio et secta diabolica. Ergo draco maledicte et omnis legio diabolica adjuramus te. Cessa decipere humanas creaturas, eisque aeternae Perditionis venenum propinare. Vade, Satana, inventor et magister omnis fallaciae, hostis humanae salutis. Humiliare sub potenti manu dei, contremisce et effuge, invocato a nobis sancto et terribili nomine, quem inferi tremunt.

We exorcise you impure spirit! From the snares of the devil free us!"

Seething with religious fervor and foaming from the mouth, the frail old woman proceeded to douse the surrounding ambassadors in holy water and chanted unintelligible gibberish at them. Seeing how much worse this would inevitably get, the Scionite deputy ambassador, Ricardo, ran and dragged to plump plenipotentiary to the exit, but not before shouting "please stop the madness ambassador, if not for the poor ambassador soaked in chrism oil, then for me."

Off topic, but this is probably the best thing I've ever seen in the SC.

[Terravoss]

That was my post you fool, not UFC's. Why does everyone here believe that I am Canada? Just because Kenny took credit for getting him booted out of the WA (which was a lie), you believe I am Canada, and I am going after Kenny's badge as retribution? Obviously you are far more obtuse than you make yourself out to be.

Hmm. Interesting. I don't recall this ever being discussed anywhere in this thread. Does anyone else?

...oops.

No but that was Yelda's intention, as clearly discussed on the AO forums. Oh yes my dear Kenny, I am capable of doing research. You had already formed the opinion that I was Canada, just after this was submitted. You see I do keep your forum under surveillance. Some very intriguing stuff goes on there I must say.

I have no idea what might be your ulterior motives, especially not knowing who the real puppetmaster is. My best guess is you don't like Kenny and want to take his shiny badge away, but that's just pure speculation.

So go on, tell us who you really are.

I have told you who I am many times in this thread already. I am me. Why is that so hard to understand? It is two letters, M and (drumroll..............) E!!!!! There was that so hard now?

What exactly have I tried to conceal here? I have made my true intentions clear many times. This is about restoring some sensibility to the council. If you believe I have ulterior motives, why don't you share with the rest of us?

I would imagine the reason most ambassadors think you have an ulterior motive is because you'd have to be obtuse to believe the one you've provided. If you were truly interested in improving the integrity of this council, not only would you have started with the meat and potatoes as opposed to the well written one you've chosen to target, but you'd put some more effort into your own proposal text, as the state of this one isn't much better than that (that is, the supposed chaff in the annals of SC laws) which you seek to repeal.

Not really. Why would I go after the small potatoes, when I can go after the heart of corruption itself? As for the effort, that was a mistake on my part. I should not have relied on game mechanics, a mistake that I will not repeat. I really was in no intention to submit this really, but Feux, and Douria kind of egged me on in their posts, and as nothing else was up for vote, or in the queue, I figured I would drop it in and see what happened. Is it my full it achieved quorum in less than 12 hours? Is it my fault it was passing by almost by over 1K votes when Kenny launched his campaign? Do I control all those votes? No.

As for your intentions? I question those, considering you happen to be a Kenny lackey.

[Yelda]

You see I do keep your forum under surveillance. Some very intriguing stuff goes on there I must say.

Really? What are we saying about you now?

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

nm.

[Terravoss]

You see I do keep your forum under surveillance. Some very intriguing stuff goes on there I must say.

Really? What are we saying about you now?

I would love to post it, but Kenny suppressed it, so I can't see it any longer.