Varrustan wrote:I personally find this proposal an outrageous infringement on my national sovereignty and see no reason for this legislation.
This piece of legislation was meant to protect the both the environment and the economy of nations, by limiting the ability of sapient beings from haphazardly bringing in with them species that might destroy entire ecosystems, which in turn puts a dent in the affected nation's environment, from perhaps the extinction of native species, and economy, from perhaps having to repair the environmental damages that these invasive species had done.
National sovereignty only applies when it doesn't cross international borders, and tourists, corporations, and the movement of one non-sapient species from its native habitat to a non-native one without any natural reasons, are grounds for international consideration. At least, such is our take on it.
I think you missed the point of this piece of legislation; it's to limit sapient beings from bringing in species that could pose a detrimental effects to the nation's environment, not to stop nature from doing its thing.Alterrum wrote:FOR, nature doesn't recognize national borders so this issue needs international regulation, and while the wording isn't perfect, it's fine for me.