[PASSED] Repeal Condemn Thatcherton

by **Welsh Cowboy** » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:25 pm

Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:
Mahaj wrote:er... today's not friday. oops.

by **BellRose** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:10 am

Cesar motioned to the Chair.

"Point of order. Should we involve Thatcherton or The Republic of The Wreaker at this stage? His Nibs Government has been perusing further old diplomatic telegrams inside The Federation Of Kievan Rus. Thatcherton was active two days ago. In a case of Repealing a Condemnation, is it correct to inform the involved nation while drafting the resolution? Or shall we wait until the matter makes it to the floor of the Security Council."

"I Yield the Floor" Cesar finished.

( Bellrose Factbook at http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Bellrose )

by **Mahaj** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:15 am

BellRose wrote:Cesar motioned to the Chair.

"Point of order. Should we involve Thatcherton or The Republic of The Wreaker at this stage? His Nibs Government has been perusing further old diplomatic telegrams inside The Federation Of Kievan Rus. Thatcherton was active two days ago. In a case of Repealing a Condemnation, is it correct to inform the involved nation while drafting the resolution? Or shall we wait until the matter makes it to the floor of the Security Council."

"I Yield the Floor" Cesar finished.

( Bellrose Factbook at http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Bellrose )

Nay, there is no need.

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:31 am

Mahaj wrote:
BellRose wrote:Cesar motioned to the Chair.

"Point of order. Should we involve Thatcherton or The Republic of The Wreaker at this stage? His Nibs Government has been perusing further old diplomatic telegrams inside The Federation Of Kievan Rus. Thatcherton was active two days ago. In a case of Repealing a Condemnation, is it correct to inform the involved nation while drafting the resolution? Or shall we wait until the matter makes it to the floor of the Security Council."

"I Yield the Floor" Cesar finished.

( Bellrose Factbook at http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Bellrose )

Nay, there is no need.

Also, the original author has CTE'd, and he was really the only one behind that proposal.

by **Kolanoma** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:06 pm

After reading this proposal and the previous resolution related to it, I hereby support the movement to repeal the condemnation of Thatcherton.

by **Dar al-Izzah** » Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:39 pm

My Royal Defence Force and I in an official conference, disagree the motion.

by **Parti Ouvrier** » Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:28 am

At vote???
Also, this could do with a re-write. It does not clarify matters; it only causes more confusion as to what actually happened. In fact, the repeal accuses the author of the resolution 'condemn Thatcherton' of various things like not having enough evidence and revenge, yet the author of this repeal can just as easily be accused of the same things. That does not make this repeal anymore supportable. Besides which, the fact that this repeal still says 'DRAFT', rather than 'AT VOTE' raises further questions as to the real motives of the author for this repeal. Therefore....

Against

Wez Spencer

by **Mahaj** » Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:17 am

Parti Ouvrier wrote:At vote???
Also, this could do with a re-write. It does not clarify matters; it only causes more confusion as to what actually happened. In fact, the repeal accuses the author of the resolution 'condemn Thatcherton' of various things like not having enough evidence and revenge, yet the author of this repeal can just as easily be accused of the same things. That does not make this repeal anymore supportable. Besides which, the fact that this repeal still says 'DRAFT', rather than 'AT VOTE' raises further questions as to the real motives of the author for this repeal. Therefore....

Against

Wez Spencer

There are RMB posts on the regional page where the author encourages people to leave.

Also a mod didn't mark this at vote, so I have.

by **West Embria** » Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:14 pm

After reveiwing the original resolution "Condemn Thatcherton," I am thoroughly appalled that the resolution was allowed to pass in the first place. It was poorly authored and in bad taste. West Embria approves it's repeal.
:clap:

by **Mahaj** » Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:39 pm

West Embria wrote:After reveiwing the original resolution "Condemn Thatcherton," I am thoroughly appalled that the resolution was allowed to pass in the first place. It was poorly authored and in bad taste. West Embria approves it's repeal.

Thank you for your support.

by **Augustus Este** » Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:43 pm

Esteria was opposed to the original resolution, so we of course vote for this resolution.

-Basilo Ferrero, Esterian Ambassador to the World Assembly

by **A mean old man** » Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:32 pm

Parti Ouvrier wrote:At vote???

At vote.

by **Opaloka** » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:04 pm

This is most welcome. The original should have been ruled out of order by the mods but they seemed asleep.

by **Sedgistan** » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:08 pm

The mods were awake, the original wasn't deleted, as it wasn't illegal.

by **Going Postal** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:37 pm

A mean old man wrote:
Parti Ouvrier wrote:At vote???

At vote.

Yes. Voted for this too.

by **Omigodtheykilledkenny** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:12 pm

Sedgistan wrote:The mods were awake, the original wasn't deleted, as it wasn't illegal.

Yes, it's such a shame that the SC doesn't also have a "bloody stupid" or a "waste of time" rule. Opposed.

by **Augustus Este** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:19 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
Sedgistan wrote:The mods were awake, the original wasn't deleted, as it wasn't illegal.

Yes, it's such a shame that the SC doesn't also have a "bloody stupid" or a "waste of time" rule. Opposed.

Waste of time? Its not like the SC was doing anything else...

by **Mahaj** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:10 pm

Good to see this progressing well.

by **Thatcherton** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:54 am

Thank you to ALL nations who have voted in favour of this REPEAL. I only found out about this proposal when it was a few hours into the vote!

I'm shocked nations have taken the time to work at this,

Many thanks,

Thatcherton

by **Mahaj** » Sat Dec 24, 2011 8:10 am

Yay it passed!

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:37 am

Congrats once again, Mahaj.

by **A mean old man** » Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:19 pm

Hooray.

by **Mahaj** » Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:33 pm

Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Congrats once again, Mahaj.

Thank you!

by **Tim-Opolis** » Sat Dec 24, 2011 5:36 pm

Thatcherton wrote:Thank you to ALL nations who have voted in favour of this REPEAL. I only found out about this proposal when it was a few hours into the vote!

I'm shocked nations have taken the time to work at this,

Many thanks,

Thatcherton

No offense but I don't think it was because of you

It was because the original was bloody terrible!

Anyways. Congratz Mahaj. Great Repeal

by **Mahaj** » Sat Dec 24, 2011 5:49 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:
Thatcherton wrote:Thank you to ALL nations who have voted in favour of this REPEAL. I only found out about this proposal when it was a few hours into the vote!

I'm shocked nations have taken the time to work at this,

Many thanks,

Thatcherton

No offense but I don't think it was because of you
It was because the original was bloody terrible!

Anyways. Congratz Mahaj. Great Repeal

LOL.

Thanks.

[PASSED] Repeal Condemn Thatcherton

Our Stand

AT VOTE???

A Special Thanks

Who is online