Advertisement
by Snefaldia » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:06 am
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 am
Snefaldia wrote:So why give two shits about people who are going to ignore it anyway?
For that matter, why are autocratic states members of an organization which requires them to pass legislation that can be contrary to their tyrannical whims?
by Krioval » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:21 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Snefaldia wrote:So why give two shits about people who are going to ignore it anyway?
For that matter, why are autocratic states members of an organization which requires them to pass legislation that can be contrary to their tyrannical whims?
Yes, should we even bother allowing nations that aren't democratic like ourselves? What could they possibly stand to offer?
by Monikian WA Mission » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:25 am
by Black Marne » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:35 am
by Snefaldia » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:58 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Snefaldia wrote:So why give two shits about people who are going to ignore it anyway?
For that matter, why are autocratic states members of an organization which requires them to pass legislation that can be contrary to their tyrannical whims?
Yes, should we even bother allowing nations that aren't democratic like ourselves? What could they possibly stand to offer?
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:11 pm
Snefaldia wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:
Yes, should we even bother allowing nations that aren't democratic like ourselves? What could they possibly stand to offer?
If all they have to offer is autocracy and a refusal to listen to the petitions of the people they claim to rule, then I sure as hell don't want them writing legislation that affects the citizens of Snefaldia in any way.
N. Taranton
etc.
by Glen-Rhodes » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:16 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:And what is to say that just because they are autocratic means they have nothing to contribute to this assembly? Could they not still have valid views on economic policy that might form the basis of an effective resolution? Or addressing an international threat that affects all nations, regardless of freedom?
by Mallorea and Riva » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:19 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:And what is to say that just because they are autocratic means they have nothing to contribute to this assembly? Could they not still have valid views on economic policy that might form the basis of an effective resolution? Or addressing an international threat that affects all nations, regardless of freedom?
Psychopaths might have genuinely good ideas on how to run asylums, but that doesn't mean we should be listening to them.
- Dr. B. Castro
by Glen-Rhodes » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:21 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:If they are good ideas why not listen?
by Mallorea and Riva » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:24 pm
by Glen-Rhodes » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:25 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Hey if a man puts forth good ideas then I'll take them into account.
by Mallorea and Riva » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:27 pm
by Snefaldia » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:32 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:
And what is to say that just because they are autocratic means they have nothing to contribute to this assembly? Could they not still have valid views on economic policy that might form the basis of an effective resolution? Or addressing an international threat that affects all nations, regardless of freedom?
You are being narrow minded in the most extreme, sirrah. Just because a nation is ruled differently does not immediately make them worthless.
by Casta Nal Expeditionary Forces Command » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:43 pm
by Bisim » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:49 pm
by Bisim » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:51 pm
Casta Nal Expeditionary Forces Command wrote:Against. Violates National Sovereignty. Players have the right to govern their own nations who they see fit.
by Knootoss » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:57 pm
Casta Nal Expeditionary Forces Command wrote:Against. Violates National Sovereignty. Players have the right to govern their own nations who they see fit.
by Darenjo » Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:52 pm
Knootoss wrote:Casta Nal Expeditionary Forces Command wrote:Against. Violates National Sovereignty. Players have the right to govern their own nations who they see fit.
OOC: You know, this is the THIRD time you announce anew that you are against this. Once every page. This sure is a creative form of multiing. And by 'creative' I mean 'annoying'.
by Knootoss » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:17 am
by Dizyntk » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:50 am
by Speculine » Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:23 pm
Knootoss wrote:EXTENDS this right equally to companies, organizations and associations that have their headquarters in a World Assembly Member State;
by Knootoss » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:51 am
Speculine wrote:Knootoss wrote:EXTENDS this right equally to companies, organizations and associations that have their headquarters in a World Assembly Member State;
We see no reason why companies, organizations, or associations deserve any right to petition. Petitions are a very personal issue and that power should never end up in the hands of an organization of any kind. They could use that power to force their employees or members to petition for their interests in order to stay an employee/member.
Because of this we stand opposed.
by Speculine » Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:19 am
Knootoss wrote:How are petitions a "personal issue"?
Knootoss wrote:And what about this resolution empowers organisations to "force their employees or members to petition"? How does that even help an organisation for that matter?
Knootoss wrote:EXTENDS this right equally to companies, organisations and associations that have their headquarters in a World Assembly Member State;
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement