
by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:30 am


by Ashmoria » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:31 am

by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:33 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:can't...stop....looking....at.....OPs......flag

by St George of England » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 am
Genivar wrote:This topic is about Social Democracies. Also called by conservatives as a Welfare State *gasp*.
What do you think of them? Does higher taxation= higher standard of living and is it worth it?
by Sibirsky » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:37 am

by St George of England » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:39 am
Sibirsky wrote:Welfare state does not equal a higher standard of living.

by Wikkiwallana » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:39 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:40 am
Sibirsky wrote:Welfare state does not equal a higher standard of living.


by Langorham » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:54 am
Genivar wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Welfare state does not equal a higher standard of living.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare%27 ... on_poverty
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themsleves

by French Union » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:00 pm
by Jello Biafra » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:05 pm

by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:45 pm
Langorham wrote:
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0597f.asp
Welfare is a safety net which provides for the needs of the poor. Welfare is necessary to bring fairness to American economic life. It is a device for protecting the poor.
Opportunities should be provided to make it possible for those in need to become self-reliant. It is far more compassionate and effective to encourage people to become self-reliant, rather than allowing them to remain dependent on the government for provisions.You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themsleves
by Sibirsky » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:46 pm
Genivar wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Welfare state does not equal a higher standard of living.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare%27 ... on_poverty
by Sibirsky » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:47 pm
Georgism wrote:I like it.
by Sibirsky » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:48 pm
Genivar wrote:Agreed. I think Jesse Ventura said it best, *Welfare was meant as a safety net, not a hammock*

by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:48 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:48 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Welfare state does not equal a higher standard of living.
by Sibirsky » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:49 pm

by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:49 pm

by Genivar » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:50 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Armeattla, Dazchan, Dimetrodon Empire, Gravlen, Habsburg Mexico, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, Narland, Necroghastia, Rary, Tarsonis, The Huskar Social Union, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Unitarian Universalism, Valles Marineris Mining co
Advertisement