by Epicnopolis » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:52 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:54 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Ashmoria » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:56 pm
by Reavani » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:56 pm
Epicnopolis wrote:I just want to know.
by Christmahanikwanzikah » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:56 pm
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:56 pm
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:57 pm
Ashmoria wrote:because its being assholish to the person you respond to
by Reavani » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:58 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Because memes are banned, if there isn't anything accompanying the meme, as substance.
I would like to comment, sibling, that this is an exceptionally frigid tale.
by Ashmoria » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:59 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Ashmoria wrote:because its being assholish to the person you respond to
So are a thousand different ways. That aren't banned.
by Georgetpwn » Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:59 pm
by Ashmoria » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:01 pm
Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:02 pm
Ashmoria wrote:the question wasnt why is it banned but why is it BAD.
by Epicnopolis » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:03 pm
by Euroslavia » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:04 pm
Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
by Reavani » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:06 pm
Euroslavia wrote:Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
The meme itself isn't banned. But if that's all you're going to say in your entire post, you may as well not post at all, because it qualifies as spam. It's pretty simple. Even before the meme craze, one-liners, a one-smiley post, and many other examples qualified as spam, because if contributed nothing new to the thread.
by Fighter4u » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:07 pm
Euroslavia wrote:Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
The meme itself isn't banned. But if that's all you're going to say in your entire post, you may as well not post at all, because it qualifies as spam. It's pretty simple. Even before the meme craze, one-liners, a one-smiley post, and many other examples qualified as spam, because if contributed nothing new to the thread.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by The Requiem of Shadow » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:08 pm
Euroslavia wrote:Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
The meme itself isn't banned. But if that's all you're going to say in your entire post, you may as well not post at all, because it qualifies as spam. It's pretty simple. Even before the meme craze, one-liners, a one-smiley post, and many other examples qualified as spam, because if contributed nothing new to the thread.
by Georgetpwn » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:08 pm
by Epicnopolis » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:08 pm
Reavani wrote:Euroslavia wrote:Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
The meme itself isn't banned. But if that's all you're going to say in your entire post, you may as well not post at all, because it qualifies as spam. It's pretty simple. Even before the meme craze, one-liners, a one-smiley post, and many other examples qualified as spam, because if contributed nothing new to the thread.
Cool Story Bro.
I keed, I keed, Spam is bad M'rah, and you should all beat whoever spams. I'm of course not spamming, just trying to make a small joke. I walk into a bar and say ouch!Hehehehehehhehe. Punny.
by BunnySaurus Bugsii » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:11 pm
Epicnopolis wrote:I just want to know.
by Fighter4u » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:11 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Reavani » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:13 pm
Fighter4u wrote:I hate Reavani a lot....
by BunnySaurus Bugsii » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:14 pm
Georgetpwn wrote:it's a banned meme?
by Fighter4u » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:16 pm
Reavani wrote:Fighter4u wrote:I hate Reavani a lot....
Everyone does, get in line, I'll knock you down later. I'm busy with too many other people.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Carahue, Castelia, Dip, Gaybeans, Hidrandia, Juristonia, Tungstan, Yektov
Advertisement