by Concordeia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:01 pm
Falkasia wrote:Concordeia wrote:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block missile spam! And I'm freakin early PMT! :mad: :(
I gotta say it. First time I read through this, I could have sworn it said something like this:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block spam missiles!
I was like, "Who the hell are you fighting... or more importantly, was your lunch meat laced?"
by The Zuiderzee » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:03 pm
Concordeia wrote:On the other hand, non-penetrative sexual intimacy carries no physiological risks. If there is no malicious coercion, threat of violence, or force involved, I have a hard time believing that such an activity can be abusive.
by Der Kaiser Mikey III » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:04 pm
Concordeia wrote:It's fine if the thread gets to the point of TL:DR, but please at least read the entirety of this first post.
I have serious doubts about society's perception of sexual relations between adults and children. Most everyone seems to believe that children cannot consent to any kind of sexual activity, and therefore, it is always abusive. From my point of view, whether a child can consent to an activity or not depends on it's level or risk, and regarding sex, it all depends on circumstance. For example, prepubescent children are not physically developed for full penetrative intercourse, and engaging in it would almost certainly result in internal injury.
On the other hand, non-penetrative sexual intimacy carries no physiological risks. If there is no malicious coercion, threat of violence, or force involved, I have a hard time believing that such an activity can be abusive. As for the fact the trauma children have apparently experienced in cases of consensual adult-child sexual relations, I believe that this is caused by the social stigmatization and cultural taboos regarding sex. If a child experienced such a positive relationship with an adult only to grow up being told by everyone else that they were horribly abused, it would make sense that they grew up with psychosocial problems. Plus, while studies have indicated that children have experienced trauma from these experiences, they never explain what actually causes it, so this explanation seems to make the most sense.
Please note that I am not saying that my assertion on the matter of adult child sex is a fact in any way, but I do believe it to be true based on what I have said so far. I'd like to know what the rest of NSG thinks about it. Again, NO FLAMES PLEASE. I know that this is a very volatile topic, but let's try and keep it civil.
by Meryuma » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:04 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Nadkor » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:04 pm
by Coccygia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:05 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:05 pm
by Meryuma » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:06 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Conserative Morality » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:07 pm
Meryuma wrote:Who defines "informed"?
by Hydesland » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:07 pm
Concordeia wrote:I believe that this is caused by the social stigmatization and cultural taboos regarding sex.
by The Zuiderzee » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:08 pm
Meryuma wrote:@The Zuiderzee:Why would consensual activity (which they very clearly specified) be abusive?
by Czardas » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:08 pm
Nadkor wrote:So we've had abortion, peadophilia...surely it's gay marriage by the weekend?
by Jagalonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:08 pm
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
by The Zuiderzee » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:09 pm
Nadkor wrote:So we've had abortion, peadophilia...surely it's gay marriage by the weekend?
by Concordeia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:09 pm
Der Kaiser Mikey III wrote:Concordeia wrote:It's fine if the thread gets to the point of TL:DR, but please at least read the entirety of this first post.
I have serious doubts about society's perception of sexual relations between adults and children. Most everyone seems to believe that children cannot consent to any kind of sexual activity, and therefore, it is always abusive. From my point of view, whether a child can consent to an activity or not depends on it's level or risk, and regarding sex, it all depends on circumstance. For example, prepubescent children are not physically developed for full penetrative intercourse, and engaging in it would almost certainly result in internal injury.
On the other hand, non-penetrative sexual intimacy carries no physiological risks. If there is no malicious coercion, threat of violence, or force involved, I have a hard time believing that such an activity can be abusive. As for the fact the trauma children have apparently experienced in cases of consensual adult-child sexual relations, I believe that this is caused by the social stigmatization and cultural taboos regarding sex. If a child experienced such a positive relationship with an adult only to grow up being told by everyone else that they were horribly abused, it would make sense that they grew up with psychosocial problems. Plus, while studies have indicated that children have experienced trauma from these experiences, they never explain what actually causes it, so this explanation seems to make the most sense.
Please note that I am not saying that my assertion on the matter of adult child sex is a fact in any way, but I do believe it to be true based on what I have said so far. I'd like to know what the rest of NSG thinks about it. Again, NO FLAMES PLEASE. I know that this is a very volatile topic, but let's try and keep it civil.
Any relations between a child under thirteen and an adult is unnatural. I think that it is heinous to make such claims, however I myself understand that 13 yr olds are of age to make the decision for themselves, and by then they know what sex is and the gravity of the act.
Falkasia wrote:Concordeia wrote:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block missile spam! And I'm freakin early PMT! :mad: :(
I gotta say it. First time I read through this, I could have sworn it said something like this:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block spam missiles!
I was like, "Who the hell are you fighting... or more importantly, was your lunch meat laced?"
by Innsmothe » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:09 pm
by Concordeia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:10 pm
Falkasia wrote:Concordeia wrote:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block missile spam! And I'm freakin early PMT! :mad: :(
I gotta say it. First time I read through this, I could have sworn it said something like this:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block spam missiles!
I was like, "Who the hell are you fighting... or more importantly, was your lunch meat laced?"
by Jagalonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:10 pm
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
by Niur » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:11 pm
Meryuma wrote:Who defines "informed"? If something is completely consensual, it isn't abusive. It might not be a good idea, but it's not abusive.
Innsmothe wrote:Meh, children are less innocent than they are portrayed as, by the time I was twelve I was actively seeking sexual partners (including adults) and had indeed been having non-penetrative sex among my peers since around 9.
I have no issue with paedophiles, unless they are either; violent, forceful or lie to the child.
by Nadkor » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:12 pm
by Concordeia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:12 pm
Hydesland wrote:Concordeia wrote:I believe that this is caused by the social stigmatization and cultural taboos regarding sex.
Regardless, even if the irreparable psychological damage is purely induced by the social stigmatization (which almost certainly will never stop being an aspect of our culture), this still means that there is absolutely no justification under any circumstance for it, a child is plainly not aware of how he or she will view the events in the future, so she did not consent to the damage that resulted (again, even if its a result of social stigmatization).
Falkasia wrote:Concordeia wrote:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block missile spam! And I'm freakin early PMT! :mad: :(
I gotta say it. First time I read through this, I could have sworn it said something like this:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block spam missiles!
I was like, "Who the hell are you fighting... or more importantly, was your lunch meat laced?"
by The Zuiderzee » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:12 pm
by Trotskylvania » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:13 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Nadkor » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:13 pm
by Concordeia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:14 pm
Falkasia wrote:Concordeia wrote:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block missile spam! And I'm freakin early PMT! :mad: :(
I gotta say it. First time I read through this, I could have sworn it said something like this:Dammit, and I got accused of tech-wanking for using megawatt-scale free electron laser CIWS on my (nuclear powered) vessels to block spam missiles!
I was like, "Who the hell are you fighting... or more importantly, was your lunch meat laced?"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, ATLANTIARIV, Bovad, Celritannia, Dazchan, Google [Bot], Neanderthaland, Philjia, Simonia, Sinclair Parish, The Two Jerseys, Valles Marineris Mining co, Valrifall, Xind
Advertisement