Yeah. I'm hoping it wins, but I don't think it will. It's a shame.
Advertisement
by Don-Valentino » Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:14 pm
The Most Glorious Hack wrote:Perhaps I'm just a cranky old man with my pants up to my armpits and a cane to shake at ruffians gittin' awn mah lawn, but I'm thinking fisting isn't especially PG-13.
by Masucciania » Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:54 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Everything seems in order. FOR.Masucciania wrote:Fellow Delegates of the Security Council:
The Confederacy of Masucciania rises in strong opposition to this proposed resolution.
The Masuccianian Parliament and Foreign Ministry recognize the deplorable actions taken by the dictatorial government of Der Fuhrer Dyszel. That having been said however, the Confederacy cannot and will not support a resolution of condemnation which includes internal policies to be condemned. The internal affairs of a state are under the sole jurisdiction of that state's sovereign government. How would more progressive states feel if the international community were controlled by dictatorships similar to that in Der Fuhrer Dyszel and were condemned because they granted extensive political and civil rights?
Therefore, the Masuccianian delegation shall vote and urge the delegations of the other member states of the World Assembly to vote "AGAINST" this proposed resolution.
The Confederacy of Masucciania respectfully yields the floor,
This would be applicable if DFD would have kept her atrocities to her own country (internally, as you seem to suggest this resolution discriminates against). But, unfortuunately, she has allowed it to leak to the rest of the world. The one that really got me was the nukes-giving. I mean, it's ONE thing to sell and trade nukes for attritional methods... But giving them away and encouraging people to use them? That is just evil genius, but evil nevertheless.
by Callisdrun » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:22 pm
Todd McCloud wrote:As a person who has roleplayed with DFD for over a year now (which is a short amount of time by her RP longevity), I voted for this. I could be wrong, but I think her NS war has lasted longer than WWII itself in terms of absolute time frames, lol.
by Ardchoilleans » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:40 am
by Ardchoilleans » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:10 am
Bellimboss wrote:
They are not "atrocities" - they are fabrications, invented by the author as a disguise which would allow him to display a personal hatred against a nation who is not worthy of a condemnation.
by Ardchoilleans » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:52 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:56 am
by Masucciania » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:33 pm
Sremski okrug wrote:Masucciania wrote:Fellow Delegates of the Security Council:
The Confederacy of Masucciania rises in strong opposition to this proposed resolution.
The Masuccianian Parliament and Foreign Ministry recognize the deplorable actions taken by the dictatorial government of Der Fuhrer Dyszel. That having been said however, the Confederacy cannot and will not support a resolution of condemnation which includes internal policies to be condemned. The internal affairs of a state are under the sole jurisdiction of that state's sovereign government. How would more progressive states feel if the international community were controlled by dictatorships similar to that in Der Fuhrer Dyszel and were condemned because they granted extensive political and civil rights?
Therefore, the Masuccianian delegation shall vote and urge the delegations of the other member states of the World Assembly to vote "AGAINST" this proposed resolution.
The Confederacy of Masucciania respectfully yields the floor,
Whilst governments shall be allowed to maintain full control over their internal affairs, the international community should also work together to protect rights of every civilian. This government has no respect for the freedom of the people that make up his/her great nation. It has also had multiple chances to change some of it's policies to give people more rights.
Whilst governments have the right to issue their own laws they must also remember that it's people make the country, not the government. Fuhrer Dyszel must be made an example of, to prove that the International community will support the common rights and freedom of people all over the world.
The Federal Republic of Sremski okrug
by Biyah » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:56 am
by Todd McCloud » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:08 pm
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:23 pm
by Northrop-Grumman » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:36 pm
by Sedgistan » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:19 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Given that 3WB (the reputed architects of Commend AMOM's 78%-22% drubbing) had to rely on the large vote total of non-affiliated region to achieve this result, it's not very impressive.
by Ballotonia » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:22 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Given that 3WB (the reputed architects of Commend AMOM's 78%-22% drubbing) had to rely on the large vote total of non-affiliated region to achieve this result, it's not very impressive.
by Glen-Rhodes » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:25 pm
Ballotonia wrote:That means the average Joe out there with a reasonably good C&C idea simply doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting something through.
by Ballotonia » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:30 pm
by Callisdrun » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:43 pm
Ballotonia wrote:
Depends on ones perspective, ofcourse. The 3WB will be thrilled about it. I'm happy too since I support their cause. That specific average Joe who supposedly doesn't support the 3WB's position won't be too happy, nor will the people who criticize the 3WB even when they don't have a C&C to submit themselves.
Ballotonia
by Unibot » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:40 pm
Callisdrun wrote:I agree that Rule IV is unfair. But that doesn't mean I like 3WB or their tactic of wrecking the SC for everyone.
From someone on the 10ki forums wrote:It is very distressing to hear that the delegacy of 10KI is now controlled by outside interests rather than the democratic will of the region's residents. Supporters of this act would do well to point this out when the 3WB and its allies begin their gloating session tomorrow morning.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:33 pm
Unibot wrote:Well, I don't know about gloating ..but.. I am happy that this was defeated. It shows that the World Assembly hasn't accepted Rule IV yet, and not even two GCR delegates could topple that iron will. I think if this is submitted in the future without this Rule IV business that it will be quite successful.. although if the nominee is as prolific of a defender as the 10ki folk made her out to be, I'm wondering if an OOC proposal would be appropriate to commend her too?
by Unibot » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:49 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Unibot wrote:Well, I don't know about gloating ..but.. I am happy that this was defeated. It shows that the World Assembly hasn't accepted Rule IV yet, and not even two GCR delegates could topple that iron will. I think if this is submitted in the future without this Rule IV business that it will be quite successful.. although if the nominee is as prolific of a defender as the 10ki folk made her out to be, I'm wondering if an OOC proposal would be appropriate to commend her too?
Take it from someone who knows: two Feeders voting against you is nothing. Try having all of them vote against you in the space of 24 hours...and still win.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Krioval » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:59 pm
Unibot wrote:Well, I don't know about gloating ..but.. I am happy that this was defeated. It shows that the World Assembly hasn't accepted Rule IV yet, and not even two GCR delegates could topple that iron will. I think if this is submitted in the future without this Rule IV business that it will be quite successful.. although if the nominee is as prolific of a defender as the 10ki folk made her out to be, I'm wondering if an OOC proposal would be appropriate to commend her too?
by Glen-Rhodes » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:05 pm
Unibot wrote:Funny, because the 3WB strongly believes that Rule IV is wrecking the SC for everyone but a selection group of individuals who generally have more influence on the Official forums.
Unibot wrote:Well, I don't know about gloating ..but.. I am happy that this was defeated. It shows that the World Assembly hasn't accepted Rule IV yet, and not even two GCR delegates could topple that iron will.
by Unibot » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:08 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote: Even just pure vote numbers don't really convey that 'the World Assembly' likes or dislikes something.[/size]
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:50 pm
by Callisdrun » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:54 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Unibot wrote:Funny, because the 3WB strongly believes that Rule IV is wrecking the SC for everyone but a selection group of individuals who generally have more influence on the Official forums.
Isn't that kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy? The Security Council is dead because of the actions of the 3WB, which is a group formed because it fears a rule would kill the Security Council...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement