After all mega-scale desalination technology is here and it does seem as if in a situation such as was faced in California existed then it might have been wise to avoid being too perfectionist and narrow in the interpretation of "environmentalism" that has been happening time after time in California for decades it seems.
Even Canada's Green Party Leader Ms. Elizabeth May back in 2008 replied to my own municipal campaign writing with the comment through Facebook that : "Turning deserts green is one part of a full response to climate change." [Canada's Green Party Leader Ms. Elizabeth May].
I actually voted for her back in 2008 because I felt that this one sentence was worth my ballot.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/12/us/calif ... index.html
As water runs short in California, commission rejects $1.4 billion desalination plant
Stephanie Elam
By Stephanie Elam, CNN
4 minute read
Updated 11:33 PM EDT, Thu May 12, 2022
Los AngelesCNN —
As California battles a historic drought and a water crisis looms, the state’s coastline protection agency on Thursday unanimously rejected the development of a $1.4 billion desalination plant in Huntington Beach that would have converted ocean water into municipal water for Orange County residents.
Eleven members of the California Coastal Commission voted against the facility, which water treatment developer Poseidon Water has been trying to build for decades.
Poseidon said the plant would be capable of producing up to 50 million gallons of drinking water a day, helping to make the region more drought resilient.
The commission, which is charged with “protecting and enhancing” the state’s extensive coastline, heard public comments on the project throughout the day Thursday, with a majority of speakers opposing it. Others who expressed concern about a lack of water resources in the future argued that, whenever possible, additional water resources should be developed.
Poseidon released a statement following the vote thanking Gov. Gavin Newsom for his support and reiterating its belief that the plant would be an important tool in maintaining the state’s water supply.
“This was not the decision we were hoping for today,” said Poseidon Director of Communications Jessica Jones. “California continues to face a punishing drought, with no end in sight. … Every day, we see new calls for conservation as reservoir levels drop to dangerous lows. We firmly believe that this desalination project would have created a sustainable, drought-tolerant source of water for Orange County, just as it has for San Diego County.”
But desalination opponents argue less expensive and less harmful conservation tactics should be the first resort.
The commission is appointed or chosen by state lawmakers and the governor. Ahead of the vote, its staff recommended against the facility, pointing in part to desalination’s incredible energy consumption, its impacts on marine life, projected sea-level rise and the cost of the resulting water itself – with that cost being passed on to customers.
Commission staff did acknowledge in the report that its findings do not mean that the project is “unapprovable,” nor that it is completely against desalination, writing: “Staff acknowledge the need to develop new, reliable sources of water in southern California, and believe that well-planned and sited desalination facilities will likely play a role in providing these supplies.”
Desalination works by separating water molecules from salty seawater through reverse osmosis. The leftover high-salinity brine is sent back to the ocean.
One plant of this scale – the Claude “Bud” Lewis Carlsbad Desalination Plant in San Diego County – is already in service. Poseidon began operating that facility in late 2015, selling its entire output to the San Diego County Water Authority in a 30-year contract.