by The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:23 pm
by Kreigsreich of Iron » Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:28 pm
”A is A”
-Ayn Rand
by Kostane » Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:31 pm
"Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God. Everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love." — 1 John 4:7-8(NCB)
News: We interrupt your normal message to declare that --- actually we can't declare anything. We're dead now. Farewell.
by Ethel mermania » Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:14 pm
by Slembana » Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:18 pm
by The Lone Alliance » Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:26 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:SNIP
by Saiwana » Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:43 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:45 pm
by Kostane » Wed Jan 15, 2025 8:46 pm
Saiwana wrote:Well, from a privacy/organized labor perspective, the employer might've wrongfully terminated them and they'd have grounds for lawsuit. Not 100% sure that there is standing or not.
The argument is that the company can terminate over incidents that happen on the clock or in workplace but shouldn't be able to or can't, for anything that isn't at work or off the clock.
"Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God. Everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love." — 1 John 4:7-8(NCB)
News: We interrupt your normal message to declare that --- actually we can't declare anything. We're dead now. Farewell.
by Ethel mermania » Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:23 am
Kostane wrote:Saiwana wrote:Well, from a privacy/organized labor perspective, the employer might've wrongfully terminated them and they'd have grounds for lawsuit. Not 100% sure that there is standing or not.
The argument is that the company can terminate over incidents that happen on the clock or in workplace but shouldn't be able to or can't, for anything that isn't at work or off the clock.
Theoretical it could be grounds for employment discrimination over political beliefs. However, if the company has a specific policy against sexism, then it would not be wrongful termination because it would be consistent with company policy. And I doubt the case would be that strong in this instance. The company has a strong argument to make that the employees association with this sexist behavior is disruptive to the workplace, and thus grounds for termination.
by New Ziedrich » Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:38 am
Saiwana wrote:Well, from a privacy/organized labor perspective, the employer might've wrongfully terminated them and they'd have grounds for lawsuit. Not 100% sure that there is standing or not.
The argument is that the company can terminate over incidents that happen on the clock or in workplace but shouldn't be able to or can't, for anything that isn't at work or off the clock.
by Saiwana » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:38 pm
New Ziedrich wrote:As a business owner, I'd have fired him for that if he'd worked for me, since I wouldn't want him blowing up on my female employees, contractors, or clients. That's the kind of behavior which would've kept him from getting hired in the first place had I known about it beforehand. I don't need to be held liable for fostering a hostile work environment or something.
by The BlAAtschApen » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:01 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Kostane wrote:Theoretical it could be grounds for employment discrimination over political beliefs. However, if the company has a specific policy against sexism, then it would not be wrongful termination because it would be consistent with company policy. And I doubt the case would be that strong in this instance. The company has a strong argument to make that the employees association with this sexist behavior is disruptive to the workplace, and thus grounds for termination.
You are allowed to discriminate based on politics in the states.
by Ethel mermania » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:32 am
by The BlAAtschApen » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:21 am
by Emotional Support Crocodile » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:57 am
by The Black Forrest » Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:53 pm
by Corporate Collective Salvation » Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:07 pm
by Cows with Guns » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:48 pm
by The Black Forrest » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:52 pm
Cows with Guns wrote:Looks like Diversity, Equality and Inclusion doesn't include such diverse behavior equally shared by morons
by Cows with Guns » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:53 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Dakran, Eahland, Eurasia102, Lord Dominator, Pointy Shark, The Black Forrest, The Lone Alliance, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement