NATION

PASSWORD

"Repeal: Injunction on Empires Forever United"

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Lakandiwa
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Dec 06, 2024
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

"Repeal: Injunction on Empires Forever United"

Postby Lakandiwa » Mon Dec 09, 2024 3:49 am

The Security Council,

Recognizing that Security Council Resolution “Hereby Injuncts Empires Forever United” was passed with the intention of protecting the region from external incursions and ensuring the safety and self-determination of its native community,

Acknowledging that such measures were designed to preserve the unique cultural and political identity of Empires Forever United during a time of great uncertainty and turmoil,

However Noting that the Injunction as it currently stands permanently prohibits the region of Empires Forever United from converting to or from a Frontier, regardless of the desires or decisions of its native community,

Concerned that this restriction undermines the core principles of sovereignty and self-governance that the Security Council seeks to uphold, as it denies the region’s nations the ability to adapt their governance model in response to changing circumstances or collective decisions,

Further Concerned that the Injunction creates a precedent that could lead to similar restrictions being placed on other regions, effectively curbing their autonomy and locking them into governance models that may no longer suit their needs or aspirations,

Observing that the resolution does not allow for any flexibility or reassessment of the Injunction based on future developments within the region, thereby treating it as an irreversible decision that imposes a permanent status on Empires Forever United,

Believing that the Security Council’s role is to protect the rights and freedoms of regions without overstepping its bounds by enforcing permanent mandates that limit regional self-determination,

Asserting that the native nations of Empires Forever United should be empowered to determine their own future without being bound by an external resolution that does not take their evolving needs into account,

Further Asserting that repealing the Injunction would restore the region’s autonomy and enable its native community to pursue governance decisions that reflect their collective will and aspirations,

Highlighting that repealing the Injunction would not compromise the Security Council’s ability to intervene in the future, should Empires Forever United face genuine threats or occupation that warrant international action,

Concluding that the continued enforcement of Security Council Resolution “Hereby Injuncts Empires Forever United” is both unnecessary and counterproductive to the principles of freedom and self-determination,

Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution “Hereby Injuncts Empires Forever United.”

User avatar
Untecna
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6876
Founded: Jun 02, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Untecna » Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:01 am

Wrong forum.
Dragon with internet access. I am coming for your data. More for the hoard.
49rs | Vols | Defenders
NS stats/policies are not canon. Except for the scientific advancement score.
Issues Author (#1520)

User avatar
Cyptopir
Minister
 
Posts: 2661
Founded: Oct 26, 2023
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Cyptopir » Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:04 am

And doesn't take into account the actual situation the region is in.
Cyptopir
Henchman in the Warzone Sandbox Mafia, Levy in the AEK and Officer (x3) in the Rejected Realms.
Information:
Flag Directory
A website

Opinions (objectively correct):
Fascism is bad. :)
You are you. Who you are is solely up to you, and no one else can tell you who you are.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Here's a word of advice; try to avoid any regions on this list and any other regions associated with them. (Credits to Improper Classifications)
\| x x |/
/| __ | \
Death to Spidey.
Ugh. ತʍತ
Any opinions shared are my own. I do not speak for any region or organization I'm involved in unless specified.

User avatar
The BlAAtschApen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 64019
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby The BlAAtschApen » Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:05 am

Untecna wrote:Wrong forum.


I've moved it.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
East Chimore
Envoy
 
Posts: 308
Founded: Sep 28, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby East Chimore » Mon Dec 09, 2024 9:31 am

This may come as a shock to some folks, but I for one fullheartedly support this repeal - the current government of EFU has been achieving their goals wonderfully, and I could not be happier with the direction we're going in.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5317
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Dec 09, 2024 9:41 am

Not drafted on forum, looks like AI generated. Basically a bloody awful badge hunt.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Former Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Raiding puPpeT
Envoy
 
Posts: 252
Founded: Apr 27, 2024
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Raiding puPpeT » Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:03 pm

I may hate badge hunts and AI. but I hate defenders more. FOR!!!
pretty dumb person
i should become president
trans rights are human rights

User avatar
Refuge Isle
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 2592
Founded: Dec 14, 2018
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Refuge Isle » Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:02 pm

Noting that I've marked this version as illegal because the operative clause does not actually target the resolution you're trying to remove.

You're going to have to either write the operative clause similarly to your duplicate resolution, ie Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution #524 "Injunct Empires Forever United." or say something like "Therefore repeals the target resolution" -- something that makes it clear that SC #524 is being hit, not just a part of it or something unrelated.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belleroph, Dushina

Advertisement

Remove ads