Quote editing(the strike); strays too close to endorsement?
All X are...?, continuing to seemingly endorse what happened.
Bogmarsh in the mud wrote:Anagonia wrote:
`1.Though, one must ask, why are CEO's even a thing in society? 2. Wouldn't someone in that position understand that their role in their position places them as a target? Why didn't he have bodyguards, as most important VIP's are prone to do, 3. especially considering the company that was being represented?
Many questions indeed linger.
1. Because someone must be available to be shot pour encourager les autres.
2. Beats me. I do observe that the scions of one or two banking families that were in my student nation, did start acquiring their own pretorian guards in the Nineties.
3. You'd think that anyone with an ounce of brains would have recast himself as the tireless selfless medical researcher, a very Albert Schweitzer.
A society that wants to persist, enforces its social hierarchies and is utterly ruthless in crushing anyone who offers the teensiest little challenge. But then again, I think Americans are addicted to change, and dont want to persist.
(emphasis added) sounds like endorsing future deaths to me?
My Chemical Romancee wrote:he fucking deserved it. to hell with him and all like him.
This is a blatant endorsement of the assassination, and encouragement to kill, too.