NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Regulating Child Internet Access

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.

What do you want the enforcement agency to be called?

Poll ended at Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:43 am

SAFE—the Strategic Alliance for Enforcement
1
4%
PROTECT—the Pornography Restriction Of Technology-based Explicit Content Taskforce
1
4%
GUARD—the Governance Unit for Adult-content Restriction
0
No votes
None of the above/I oppose this legislation
24
92%
 
Total votes : 26

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

[DRAFT] Regulating Child Internet Access

Postby Alkzine » Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:51 pm

We All Agree No Child Should Watch Porn; So Should The WA. Let's Protect Our Children From Inappropriate Content!

Regulating Child Internet Access

The World Assembly,



AWARE OF the prevalence of harmful and extreme content on the Internet;



WHOLEHEARTEDLY COMMITTED to protecting the innocence of all children;



PARTICULARLY CONCERNED at the risk of children being exposed to pornography, sexualised content and extreme violence;



UNSETTLED BY the growing prevalence of pornography addiction and unhealthy attitudes to sexuality;



BELIEVING that sexual education should be taught by responsible adults in the classroom, rather than learnt from potentially dubious sources on the internet;



Hereby mandates;

    1.Definitions:
      1. 'child' - any person under the legal age of sexual consent in that nation.

      2. 'sexually explicit' - refers to any visual, written, or audio content that clearly and unambiguously depicts or describes: actual or simulated acts of sexual intercourse, oral-genital contact, masturbation, or other overt sexual activity, whether consensual or non-consensual in nature; the intentional display of genitalia, buttocks, or breasts in a manner intended to arouse, titillate, or emphasize sexual themes; content where the dominant theme or purpose is the portrayal or communication of erotic, intimate, or sexual situations, including discussions or depictions of sexual fantasies or fetishes and excluding artistic, scientific, medical, or educational materials where the sexual or anatomical depiction is incidental to the broader purpose; and content where nudity or sexual references are presented for comedic, literary, or satirical purposes and do not seek to arouse or offend.

      3. 'shockingly violent' - depictions of mutilated bodies or sadistic torture.

      4. 'accurate verification' - the use of official government documents and/or databases to ascertain the age of an individual beyond a reasonable doubt.

    2. Online companies hosting or providing sexually explicit or shockingly violent content have a legal responsibility to prevent children from viewing this content through accurate verification of client age. Failure to do so will result in escalating punishment action from the World Assembly, including fines and enforced closure.

    3. Knowingly aiding a child to bypass age verification checks for a website hosting or providing sexually explicit content is a form of indirect sexual abuse and must be punished in line with other types of child grooming.

    4. Schools must, to the best of their ability, and when age appropriate (to be determined on an individual basis by each nation) educate children on both healthy attitudes to sexuality, and the psychological and social harms of consuming sexually explicit content online.


Last edited by Alkzine on Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:43 am, edited 36 times in total.
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

User avatar
Pomovean Trade Republic
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Nov 28, 2024
Ex-Nation

Postby Pomovean Trade Republic » Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:53 pm

Opposing.
Child under the age of sixteen. A legal adult is 18, so a loophole could be exploited here.
A prospering Mercantile republic bordering a trade company.

Year: 1938
LE JOURNAL POMOVEEN /// 1 banar a paper /// Recent tensions between Yakra and Kishum prompt Pomovea to up military spending

User avatar
Kostane
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6140
Founded: Nov 07, 2022
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kostane » Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:56 pm

Oppose. I’m not Australian.

Also, restricting internet access under the age of 12 is too extreme — you should allow states to put in their own internet regimes for minors (e.g. having an educational internet that they could access without supervision).
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God." — Matthew 5:9 (NCB)
News: We interrupt your normal message to declare that --- actually we can't declare anything. We're dead now. Farewell.
TG Me — anytime, anywhere, for any reason

User avatar
Uan aa Boa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1155
Founded: Apr 23, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Uan aa Boa » Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:57 pm

Isn't it pretty fundamental to the concept of a law that you can't be exempt from it on an ad hoc basis when desirable?
Last edited by Uan aa Boa on Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Ice States
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 3899
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Ice States » Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:57 pm

We need a UN card for "the WA is not Australia" :P

On a serious note, I don't see how this can be written without contradicting GA #299. The blocker in Section 4 would prevent specifying a specific age (eg 12) for "any other rights or responsibilities within their jurisdictions"; this would include using the internet without parental supervision.
Last edited by The Ice States on Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Festering Snakepit Wiki
· General Assembly Guides · Resolution Stat Effects · Style Guide · WACampaign

Factbooks · WA Authorships · Nation map


"Petty tyrant", "antithetical to a better future for the WA". Posts in the WA forums are in a personal capacity, unless indicated otherwise.

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Alkzine » Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:07 pm

Uan aa Boa wrote:Isn't it pretty fundamental to the concept of a law that you can't be exempt from it on an ad hoc basis when desirable?

is this change better ?
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Alkzine » Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:15 pm

The Ice States wrote:On a serious note, I don't see how this can be written without contradicting GA #299. The blocker in Section 4 would prevent specifying a specific age (eg 12) for "any other rights or responsibilities within their jurisdictions"; this would include using the internet without parental supervision.

I would interpret that as saying that individual nations have the right to limit people’s rights based on age (“the right…to set reasonable thresholds]”, rather than saying that the WA can’t impose an age requirement on anything anymore. It doesn’t say nations have the sole right to impose thresholds; just that they can if they want to.

Are you saying that the WA hasn’t limited anything by age, because age limits can only set by individual nations? I’m sure theres at leadt one extant resolution with an age limit.
Last edited by Alkzine on Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

User avatar
The Ice States
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 3899
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Ice States » Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:08 pm

Alkzine wrote:
The Ice States wrote:On a serious note, I don't see how this can be written without contradicting GA #299. The blocker in Section 4 would prevent specifying a specific age (eg 12) for "any other rights or responsibilities within their jurisdictions"; this would include using the internet without parental supervision.

I would interpret that as saying that individual nations have the right to limit people’s rights based on age (“the right…to set reasonable thresholds]”, rather than saying that the WA can’t impose an age requirement on anything anymore. It doesn’t say nations have the sole right to impose thresholds; just that they can if they want to.

Are you saying that the WA hasn’t limited anything by age, because age limits can only set by individual nations? I’m sure theres at leadt one extant resolution with an age limit.

I am in fact not aware of any resolution which sets a hard age limit such as 12 or 16 for its mandates.

Festering Snakepit Wiki
· General Assembly Guides · Resolution Stat Effects · Style Guide · WACampaign

Factbooks · WA Authorships · Nation map


"Petty tyrant", "antithetical to a better future for the WA". Posts in the WA forums are in a personal capacity, unless indicated otherwise.

User avatar
Aekaria
Envoy
 
Posts: 329
Founded: Sep 12, 2024
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Aekaria » Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:13 pm

Opposed.

This is a terrible idea. They will use it, and you have no way to stop it- were pornography and streaming and video sharing sites to effectively ban child viewers, they would lose some half of their audience. This will never be enforced.

Moreover, whilst also contrasting GA299 (was that it? check above), why? This will only restrict the happiness of children. Once they have known the internet, the will be unhappy being cut off from it. And if you try to cut it off from a specific age...they will look at their older siblings and complain of the injustice.

The internet can be quite useful as well. It teaches people, educates people in toxic households...and do you really want students who are underage to comb through hours of literature just for one fact?

If children are developing addictions, help them get over it- allow them real-world hobbies and let them indulge. Do not cut it off. That will not help an addict's mental health. It will only make everything worse.

Your intentions are pure, but this is not how to go about it.
Last edited by Aekaria on Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"You are a coward, as all cruel men are."
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment. Reason begets doubt; Doubt begets heresy. Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none. Zeal is its own excuse."
"Now we rage against The Dying of The Light."
"It is not easy to be different, and even less so to be unique."
"Heroism is easily crushed by the weight of Eternity."-Myself.
"Die as you live, son of The Eighth Legion."
"For love is the bane of honour, the death of duty."
"Humanity is venal and fractious. It can never be governed as one. Everything else is an impossible dream."


"Die as you live, in midnight-gold clad." (Die, a Son of The Dominion) -The Fifth Dominate

User avatar
Sliabh Grianas
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Oct 22, 2022
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sliabh Grianas » Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:17 pm

Opposed for the same reasons as Aekaria. Also, I feel it would contradict my constitution.
lgbtqia2s+ rights are human rights
eat the rich

A country on a large island in the South Pacific, populated by about 500 million Sliabh Grianasians and many unicorns. Republic started in 1827 following the Sliabh Grianasian Revolution. Island of Sliabh Grianas inhabited since before 5000 BCE.
pimo/ex-Mormon trans girl fighting senior year of high school, everything is fine
pro: socialism, secularism, humanism, LGBTQIA2S+, pro-choice, feminism, RCV, proportional representation, youth rights, green energy

anti: capitalism, free market, authoritarianism, electoral college, racism, queerphobia, xenophobia, bigotry, sexism, misogyny, transmisogyny, Trump, MAGA

User avatar
Bir Matras
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Jun 24, 2024
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Bir Matras » Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:21 pm

The nation of Bir Matras is also opposed to this Idea

We belive that the Internet is an important part in helping a child find itself. This can not be truly achieved with a parent/guardian observing as the Child will feel restricted to explore their Identity. Of course there are things on the Internet not intended for Children, but we see no sensible way of restricting all Children across the WA from seeing that Content. Furthermore, we belive that this is a decision each nation should make for itself and not something that should be enforced

User avatar
South Poopistan
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Dec 03, 2020
New York Times Democracy

Postby South Poopistan » Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:54 pm

Opposed. While I usually only express my feelings towards resolutions at the proverbial ballot box, I feel this is, while a good idea on paper with good intentions, especially and certainly paves the road to hell and back. Not only have "screens" been shown to largely benefit children and adults in various ways, (no, I'm not advocating brainrot, that's a separate issue that should be addressed somewhere other than here (although seeing 'skibidi' in a WA resolution would be rather funny)) from propagating social interactions on locations such as forums (sound familiar?) to games improving hand-eye coordination among other things for multitudes of those tested on. Depriving today's children the multiverse wide of this, along with those who have already had internet access, as Aekaria noted, would simply not be beneficial for the people of the various nations. I simply do not see the point in so viciously regulating such revolutionary technology, especially with a loophole wider than most whales in Mandate 5, for those under 12. In my opinion, regulating a child's internet use should be left up to the parent; if a nine-year-old child wishes to watch something this regulation would bar them from watching due to a subjective level of "age-inappropriate" content, that's up to their guardian to decide. I agree schools should educate on the dangers of the internet, however this should under no circumstances involve simply telling children that the internet itself is dangerous in any and all forms, rather schools should educate children on how to be safe online via not providing personal information. This education against the internet could, over generations, simply destroy any will to utilize the internet for most anything, essentially regressing society across the multiverse. A well-intentioned yet poorly justified and written proposal with an incorrect definition of "child." This concept should be either seriously reviewed or scrapped, in my opinion, and most here seem to agree with me. I very much understand the goal, and it is certainly a noble one, but it is rather poorly executed. I did not intend to be so scathing, and it comes from no place of ill will for the author, I am merely concerned over the quality and necessity of this proposal. In sum, this proposal has a good goal, but is rather poorly written, and has some fundamental flaws that must be addressed.
Hi! I'm South Poopistan. (shut it.)
I creep on the forums and rarely post. My nation would be a good place to live. (My friend says that's boring.)
Male, Gen Z, Atheist, Immature sense of humor (as if you couldn't guess,) Don't watch TikTok, Don't think it should be banned, Liberal, Trump sucks, All that, Support LGBTQIA+ folks because why wouldn't I, Windows Vista is awesome
Minecraft, Roblox Bee Swarm Simulator, Undertale/Deltarune, Gravity Falls, Nintendo, Age of Civilizations/History series, Countryballs, Object Shows

User avatar
Bananaistan
Senator
 
Posts: 3615
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:33 pm

Alkzine wrote:
The Ice States wrote:On a serious note, I don't see how this can be written without contradicting GA #299. The blocker in Section 4 would prevent specifying a specific age (eg 12) for "any other rights or responsibilities within their jurisdictions"; this would include using the internet without parental supervision.

I would interpret that as saying that individual nations have the right to limit people’s rights based on age (“the right…to set reasonable thresholds]”, rather than saying that the WA can’t impose an age requirement on anything anymore. It doesn’t say nations have the sole right to impose thresholds; just that they can if they want to.

Are you saying that the WA hasn’t limited anything by age, because age limits can only set by individual nations? I’m sure theres at leadt one extant resolution with an age limit.


OOC: If the WA says that the age limit for X is now Y, then the member nation has lost the right to set its own age limit of Z for X. The long standing interpretation and indeed the whole purpose of GAR#299 is to block any proposal setting hard and fast age limits for anything.
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281
THIS

User avatar
The Overmind
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1993
Founded: Dec 12, 2022
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby The Overmind » Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:04 pm

Not an international issue. Way overzealous. Too specific to apply to all races in the WA.
Last edited by The Overmind on Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free Palestine
2024 Kenmoria Award
2024 Contributor of the Year Award
Trans men are men | Trans women are women | Sex is non-binary
Assigned sex isn't biological sex | Trans rights are human rights

Neuroscientist | Heavens Reach | He/Him/His

User avatar
Attempted Socialism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1781
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Attempted Socialism » Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:50 pm

I think it's a clear improvement that this resolution is merely a doomed moralistic crusade, rather than promoting outright bigotry. I hope the author continues this development.


Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide
Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship.
Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt?Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes
My NS career

User avatar
The Kharkivan Cossacks
Diplomat
 
Posts: 825
Founded: Oct 28, 2023
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The Kharkivan Cossacks » Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:54 pm

I know having children on the internet can lead to some not desirable things, like well, Gen Alpha brain rot and trouble with social n shit.
Is what I would say if this was OOC, but this is the WA, so things look real different. Against both on basis of author and proposal.
Former WA Delegate of of 222 days and Minister of External and Internal affairs of Imperial World Nations
Former Officer of Integration and current Officer of Public Relations and World Assembly of The Rejected Realms
Lone Wolves United most recent Ghazi
NSGP - All I say is my personal opinion and not that of any org I am in unless specified
Fascists are bad folks no matter how you put it.
"Modern communists" supporting genocidal dictators and taking extremism only drags their cause in the dirt

Borscht is rather nice.

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Kharkivan has done a pretty good hatchet job review of the text, though I’m sure there will be those posting who think this is the best thing since sliced bread.

User avatar
Untecna
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6874
Founded: Jun 02, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Untecna » Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:44 pm

Opposed. There is no sound way to enforce this legislation. On top of that, the author contributes to my opposition.
Dragon with internet access. I am coming for your data. More for the hoard.
49rs | Vols | Defenders
NS stats/policies are not canon. Except for the scientific advancement score.
Issues Author (#1520)

User avatar
Uan aa Boa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1155
Founded: Apr 23, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Uan aa Boa » Sat Nov 30, 2024 6:17 am

Alkzine wrote:
Uan aa Boa wrote:Isn't it pretty fundamental to the concept of a law that you can't be exempt from it on an ad hoc basis when desirable?

is this change better ?

Not really. What does "genuinely necessary" mean? Is it genuinely necessary to play games and watch cat videos? And what about "unique circumstances"? That seems to mean that if more than one child is seriously unwell with the same condition the exemption can't apply.

These quibbles are the least of your problems here though. This is never going anywhere.

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Alkzine » Sun Dec 01, 2024 3:27 am

This legislation is a necessary, albeit belated, attempt to reclaim some semblance of control in an era where children are increasingly subjected to the digital chaos of our time. In a world where the internet is a breeding ground for unsupervised exposure to explicit content and unhealthy habits, the proposal seeks to mitigate the harm inflicted on the most vulnerable members of society—our children. It is not an overreach, but a responsible acknowledgment of the simple truth: childhood, once a time for innocence, has been hijacked by the all-consuming digital void. A filter, both literal and metaphorical, is merely a small but crucial step in protecting the future from the consequences of unfiltered access.
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Alkzine » Sun Dec 01, 2024 4:17 am

Will be submitting tomorrow if there continue to be no objections to this draft.
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

User avatar
Attempted Socialism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1781
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Attempted Socialism » Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:34 am

Alkzine wrote:Will be submitting tomorrow if there continue to be no objections to this draft.
Your first draft went something like this:
Doesn't listen to feedback.
Doesn't consider opposition.
Drafts for 2-3 days.
Writes reactionary, pro-bigotry garbage.
Submits, gets marked illegal, throws tantrum, falls out of queue.

So with that abject failure behind you, you think repetition is the way to go?

Edit: I miscounted, it was 2-3 days, not 3-4 as I originally wrote. The thread was active for 3-4 days.
Last edited by Attempted Socialism on Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:36 am, edited 1 time in total.


Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide
Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship.
Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt?Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes
My NS career

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Alkzine » Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:08 am

Attempted Socialism wrote:
Alkzine wrote:Will be submitting tomorrow if there continue to be no objections to this draft.
Your first draft went something like this:
Doesn't listen to feedback.
Doesn't consider opposition.
Drafts for 2-3 days.
Writes reactionary, pro-bigotry garbage.
Submits, gets marked illegal, throws tantrum, falls out of queue.

So with that abject failure behind you, you think repetition is the way to go?

Edit: I miscounted, it was 2-3 days, not 3-4 as I originally wrote. The thread was active for 3-4 days.

what is wrong with the new draft?
I tried to take on board everyone’s opinions and significantly changed it
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

User avatar
Attempted Socialism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1781
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Attempted Socialism » Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:45 am

Alkzine wrote:
Attempted Socialism wrote:Your first draft went something like this:
Doesn't listen to feedback.
Doesn't consider opposition.
Drafts for 2-3 days.
Writes reactionary, pro-bigotry garbage.
Submits, gets marked illegal, throws tantrum, falls out of queue.

So with that abject failure behind you, you think repetition is the way to go?

Edit: I miscounted, it was 2-3 days, not 3-4 as I originally wrote. The thread was active for 3-4 days.

what is wrong with the new draft?
I tried to take on board everyone’s opinions and significantly changed it

Well then, since everyone's had time to read through your draft, think about it, give feedback, and you have had enough time to flawlessly adjust everything, you are all set to go! Surely a few days is enough for someone as sophisticated and experienced as yourself to craft a good resolution that will garner the necessary support, even though it takes veterans weeks if not months to do the same.
...
No? Then give it time. 4 weeks is a good minimum unless you are sure you know what you are doing. I haven't read the latest iteration, for instance. I saw that you deleted the specific ages, which might be enough to make it legal. But legal garbage is still garbage that won't make it to vote. If it's controversial a resolution needs even more time to fine-tune and convince people.


Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide
Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship.
Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt?Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes
My NS career

User avatar
Astrobolt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 643
Founded: Jul 30, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Astrobolt » Sun Dec 01, 2024 8:28 am

OOC: Pretty sure 4 is a House of Cards violation.
Regardless, strongly opposed.
TITO Tactical Officer
Ambassador to the WA: Mr. Reede Tappe


For a detailed list of positions, and other things of note, click here.

User avatar
Alkzine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Alkzine » Sun Dec 01, 2024 8:39 am

Astrobolt wrote:OOC: Pretty sure 4 is a House of Cards violation.
Regardless, strongly opposed.

does this fix the house of cards issue ?
שמע ישראל ד אלוקינו ד אחד | Listen, Jews: Hashem is Our G-d; Hashem Is The Only One | אין עוד מלבדו | There Is Nothing Other Than G-d | ועשיתה את הטוב ואת הישר | You Must Do What Is Good and Straight| אלוקים עשה את האדם ישר והמה ביקשו חשבונות רבים | G-d Made Man Upright, But They Made Excuses | ובחרתה בחיים | Choose To Live

טוב טעם ודעת למדני כי במצוותיך האמנתי | Teach Me Logic And Understanding, For I Have Been Faithful To Your Commandments

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Countriopia, Sloventa, The Byrdlands

Advertisement

Remove ads