NATION

PASSWORD

Authorization to Engage in Roleplay and Territorial Annexati

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
REINO DO BRASIL122
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Jul 09, 2024
New York Times Democracy

Authorization to Engage in Roleplay and Territorial Annexati

Postby REINO DO BRASIL122 » Sun Nov 10, 2024 1:19 am

Authorization to Engage in Roleplay and Territorial Annexation in the Context of Controlled Conflicts

The Security Council,
Recognizing the value of allowing nations to interact through roleplay wars and confirming that simulated conflicts can be a peaceful and engaging way to involve players, it is established that roleplay wars may occur without violating the rules of respect and without disturbing the harmony of the game.
Therefore, the following conditions are proposed:

1. Roleplay Declaration of War:
a. Nations may declare war on other nations without facing any direct repercussions to their ranking or sport.
b. The roleplay war will not lead to losses of resources or other negative outcomes.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14664
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Sun Nov 10, 2024 1:36 am

Rule 2a violation - you cannot say "roleplay" in your proposal. Also a Rule 3b violation even if you sort the "roleplay" issue out, because you cannot change the rules or how RP war works. You should not be submitting this as it can't possibly be made legal.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Lydia Anderson, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715, GA#757
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; proclaimer of WZTC's move to Palmetto
Tinhampton the player: 49yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading nothing (sorry)

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5207
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Nov 10, 2024 2:34 am

REINO DO BRASIL122 wrote:Authorization to Engage in Roleplay and Territorial Annexation in the Context of Controlled Conflicts

The Security Council,
Recognizing the value of allowing nations to interact through roleplay wars and confirming that simulated conflicts can be a peaceful and engaging way to involve players, it is established that roleplay wars may occur without violating the rules of respect and without disturbing the harmony of the game.
Therefore, the following conditions are proposed:

1. Roleplay Declaration of War:
a. Nations may declare war on other nations without facing any direct repercussions to their ranking or sport.
b. The roleplay war will not lead to losses of resources or other negative outcomes.

I suggest you read the rules before posting anymore illegal drafts.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
United Calanworie
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 5011
Founded: Dec 12, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby United Calanworie » Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:19 am

You've made five threads in the last day all with proposals generated by AI. While AI proposals are not, inherently, against the rules, you have posted Quite A Lot Of Threads, and have not engaged in any of them. This is called spam. Please refrain from posting more and instead engage in the threads you have already posted.

-- United Calanworie
Technical Moderator


Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads