[R] Baiting

[The Notorious Mad Jack]

Europe has been responsible for some of the worst atrocities in history in addition to large scale football violence. Doesn't sound civilized to me. Maccabi fans were also engaged in violence but no "leader" (cuckold) has condemned that. Euro leaders are hypocrites, two tier cunts.

Palestine enjoyers try not to bring up European atrocities from the depths of history in order to excuse an atrocity committed by Muslims 5 minutes ago challenge (IMPOSSIBLE) (IMMEDIATE FAIL) (GONE STUPID)

That entire thread probably needs a trawl, including this post by a moderator too:

Adults have the ability to control themselves; there's no justification to have attacked no matter what they said, lest the kindergarten justification of "he called me stupid" be valid.

Vass fundamentally believes that the "good people" should be allowed to violently assault the "bad people" in basically every circumstance. She's basically the anti-LM and has excuses every time Muslims engage in some form of violence against any other group, Muslim or non-Muslim. She has literally no moral authority at all and can and should be disregarded whenever she offers drive-by commentary based on begging the question or out-of-context Twitter clips.

[Fahran]

Vass has an established pattern of rushing into threads about how Islamic or left-wing extremists have engaged in violence against other groups to make excuses, ask off-topic questions that mischaracterize other people's arguments or shift attention to other social, ethnic, or religious groups that she deems problematic, or engage in sealioning. I can pull up dozens of posts across five years.

It's difficult for me to see how calling her out for this worldview and behavior, and asserting that she has no moral authority as a result of said worldview and behavior, constitutes baiting. She's more than welcome to argue that she has consistent moral principles, that she believes that violently assaulting people is wrong, and that she makes good faith arguments, even if all of those claims are demonstrably untrue given past statements.

The two statements that are actually directed against her as a person, rather than against her ostensible support for violence against perceived political enemies and her constant bad faith arguments, are a comparison to Liberal Malaysia and an assertion that she lacks moral authority. As far as statements go, neither is terribly severe.