[DRAFT] Repeal of GA 531: Tariff and Trade Convention

[The Greater Solev Union]

Preamble:
Whereas GA 531 imposes barriers to trade that create inefficiencies and obstruct economic cooperation among member states;

Whereas the resolution lacks provisions for modern trade practices and fails to consider the diversity of economic conditions among member states;

Whereas the enforcement of quantitative restrictions and import licensing as stated in sections 3 and 4 conflicts with the principles of free trade;

Whereas changing trade dynamics necessitate the establishment of a more integrated economic market to facilitate trade, goods, and labor between member states;

Be it now that:

Section 1:

Repeal of GA 531: GA 531 is hereby repealed to promote a more inclusive and effective trade framework.

Section 2 Rationale for Repeal:

a. Outdated Trade Barriers: Sections 3 and 4 impose quantitative restrictions and licensing requirements that hinder free trade, contrary to the principles of economic cooperation.

b. Lack of Flexibility: The resolution does not adapt to the complexities of modern trade, failing to address the needs of member states with varying economic circumstances.

b(i) The existing resolution's sections that impose strict quantitative restrictions can disproportionately affect smaller economies, particularly through:

b(ii) Export Restrictions (Section 4): Temporary export restrictions to alleviate shortages can hinder smaller exporters who may not have large inventories to absorb such limitations.

b(iii) Import Licensing (Section 3): The requirement for import licenses creates additional bureaucracy, disproportionately affecting smaller businesses that lack the resources to navigate complex licensing processes, potentially reducing their market access and competitiveness.

c. Encouraging New Resolution: The repeal will facilitate the drafting of a new resolution that incorporates best practices from successful trade agreements while ensuring equitable representation of member interests.

d. Integrated Economic Market: The forthcoming resolution will involve the establishment of a more integrated economic market that is essential to adapt to evolving trade dynamics, enabling efficient movement of goods and labor across member states.

e. Future Commitment: The new resolution will aim to create a fairer and more efficient trade environment that fosters economic growth and collaboration among member states, ultimately benefiting the global economy.

This Proposal was originally drafted by a Member of my Region (Taxos), I am merely fulfilling my Duties as the World Assembly Delegate.

[The Overmind]

Just an FYI: WA delegate or no, you cannot submit someone else's work. If you made the thread on their behalf, with their permission, that's fine, but they must submit it if they are the author.

[The Ice States]

Just an FYI: WA delegate or no, you cannot submit someone else's work. If you made the thread on their behalf, with their permission, that's fine, but they must submit it if they are the author.

Adding onto this, you technically can submit if the original author gave you permission; though keep in mind that this is sometimes frowned upon if you did not contribute to the text otherwise.

[The Overmind]

Just an FYI: WA delegate or no, you cannot submit someone else's work. If you made the thread on their behalf, with their permission, that's fine, but they must submit it if they are the author.

Adding onto this, you technically can submit if the original author gave you permission; though keep in mind that this is sometimes frowned upon if you did not contribute to the text otherwise.

Or where there is the appearance that it wasn't actually voluntary due to your relative positions in your regional structure.

[Tinhampton]

Aside from the plagiarism issue, this also looks lke ChatGPT. It isn't illegal but we saw what happened to Declaration on Diplomacy in the SC

[The Overmind]

Aside from the plagiarism issue, this also looks lke ChatGPT. It isn't illegal but we saw what happened to Declaration on Diplomacy in the SC

So it is. Three detectors concur. It would have been a hard pass, if it passed at all, had the ChatGPT use been disclosed, but without that disclosure, it's pretty much DOA.

[Taxos]

Just an FYI: WA delegate or no, you cannot submit someone else's work. If you made the thread on their behalf, with their permission, that's fine, but they must submit it if they are the author.

Adding onto this, you technically can submit if the original author gave you permission; though keep in mind that this is sometimes frowned upon if you did not contribute to the text otherwise.

i am the original author and yes i gave the wa delegate permission to post it on my behalf.

[Bananaistan]

OOC: Link to the target in the OP. I can't be arsed going looking it up myself so I'm automatically opposed.

[Untecna]

ChatGPT usage is an automatic "no" from me.